胶囊内镜下人工智能辅助多形性病变检测与鉴别的临床验证。

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva, João Ferreira, João Afonso, Francisco Mendes, William Preston Sonnier, Bruno Rosa, Tiago Ribeiro, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Miguel Martins, Pedro Campelo, Cláudia Macedo, Pedro Cardoso, Joana Mota, Maria João Almeida, António Pinto da Costa, Ana Pérez-Gonzalez, Jorge Mendoza, Thicianie Andrade Cavalcante, Erika Borges Fortes, Matheus de Carvalho, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Ana Patrícia Andrade, Hélder Cardoso, Eduardo Horneaux de Moura, Cecílio Santander, Jack di Palma, José Cotter, Guilherme Macedo
{"title":"胶囊内镜下人工智能辅助多形性病变检测与鉴别的临床验证。","authors":"Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva, João Ferreira, João Afonso, Francisco Mendes, William Preston Sonnier, Bruno Rosa, Tiago Ribeiro, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Miguel Martins, Pedro Campelo, Cláudia Macedo, Pedro Cardoso, Joana Mota, Maria João Almeida, António Pinto da Costa, Ana Pérez-Gonzalez, Jorge Mendoza, Thicianie Andrade Cavalcante, Erika Borges Fortes, Matheus de Carvalho, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Ana Patrícia Andrade, Hélder Cardoso, Eduardo Horneaux de Moura, Cecílio Santander, Jack di Palma, José Cotter, Guilherme Macedo","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Capsule endoscopy (CapE) is a minimally invasive procedure designed for small bowels' evaluation. However, prolonged reading times and a risk of missing clinically significant findings limit its potential. Prospective clinical validation studies of artificial intelligence (AI) for CapE remain scarce. Furthermore, existing studies focus on lesion detection, without addressing lesion differentiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of a multicenter prospective validation study was to compare AI-assisted reading with conventional CapE reading. Three hundred thirty CapE videos from 3 devices across 7 centers and 4 countries were included. After conventional reading reports, AI-assisted reading was performed by an independent expert using a deep learning model to detect and differentiate pleomorphic small bowel lesions. Both reports were reviewed by an expert from an independent center, which decided in discrepant cases. AI-assisted and standard readings were evaluated through their accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and small bowel lesion detection rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-assisted reading detected 605 of 635 lesions identified by expert-based consensus, whereas standard reading identified 354 lesions. AI-assisted reading outperformed standard reading, with small bowel lesion detection rate of 96.1% vs 76.3% and sensitivity of 97.5% vs 78.2%. AI-assisted reading had a mean examination reading time of 203 seconds per examination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This was the first multicentric study proving AI-assisted CapE reading superiority compared with conventional reading. The inclusion of videos from multiple devices addresses the interoperability challenge, whereas including patients from 4 countries and 2 different continents assures a diverse demographic context. AI achieved gastroenterologist-level identification of small-bowel lesions, surpassing conventional reading methods in both lesion detection and characterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-Life Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection and Differentiation of Pleomorphic Lesions in Capsule Endoscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva, João Ferreira, João Afonso, Francisco Mendes, William Preston Sonnier, Bruno Rosa, Tiago Ribeiro, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves, Miguel Martins, Pedro Campelo, Cláudia Macedo, Pedro Cardoso, Joana Mota, Maria João Almeida, António Pinto da Costa, Ana Pérez-Gonzalez, Jorge Mendoza, Thicianie Andrade Cavalcante, Erika Borges Fortes, Matheus de Carvalho, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Ana Patrícia Andrade, Hélder Cardoso, Eduardo Horneaux de Moura, Cecílio Santander, Jack di Palma, José Cotter, Guilherme Macedo\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Capsule endoscopy (CapE) is a minimally invasive procedure designed for small bowels' evaluation. However, prolonged reading times and a risk of missing clinically significant findings limit its potential. Prospective clinical validation studies of artificial intelligence (AI) for CapE remain scarce. Furthermore, existing studies focus on lesion detection, without addressing lesion differentiation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of a multicenter prospective validation study was to compare AI-assisted reading with conventional CapE reading. Three hundred thirty CapE videos from 3 devices across 7 centers and 4 countries were included. After conventional reading reports, AI-assisted reading was performed by an independent expert using a deep learning model to detect and differentiate pleomorphic small bowel lesions. Both reports were reviewed by an expert from an independent center, which decided in discrepant cases. AI-assisted and standard readings were evaluated through their accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and small bowel lesion detection rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-assisted reading detected 605 of 635 lesions identified by expert-based consensus, whereas standard reading identified 354 lesions. AI-assisted reading outperformed standard reading, with small bowel lesion detection rate of 96.1% vs 76.3% and sensitivity of 97.5% vs 78.2%. AI-assisted reading had a mean examination reading time of 203 seconds per examination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This was the first multicentric study proving AI-assisted CapE reading superiority compared with conventional reading. The inclusion of videos from multiple devices addresses the interoperability challenge, whereas including patients from 4 countries and 2 different continents assures a diverse demographic context. AI achieved gastroenterologist-level identification of small-bowel lesions, surpassing conventional reading methods in both lesion detection and characterization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003756\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003756","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:胶囊内窥镜(CE)是一种用于小肠评估的微创手术。然而,长时间的阅读和错过临床重要发现的风险限制了它的潜力。人工智能(AI)治疗CE的前瞻性临床验证研究仍然很少。此外,现有的研究主要集中在病变的检测上,而没有解决病变的鉴别问题。方法:一项多中心前瞻性验证研究旨在比较人工智能辅助与传统ce读数。330 CE视频来自七个中心和四个国家的三个设备。在常规阅读报告后,由独立专家使用深度学习模型进行人工智能辅助阅读,以检测和区分多形性小肠病变。两份报告都由一个独立中心的专家进行了审查,该中心在不同的情况下做出了决定。通过准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值以及小肠病变检出率(SBLDR)对人工智能辅助和标准读数进行评价。结果:人工智能辅助阅读检测到专家共识识别的635个病变中的605个,而标准阅读识别出354个病变。人工智能辅助阅读优于标准阅读,SBLDR为96.1%比76.3%,灵敏度为97.5%比78.2%。人工智能辅助阅读每次考试的平均阅读时间为203秒。讨论:这是第一个证明人工智能辅助CE阅读优于传统阅读的多中心研究。包括来自多个设备的视频解决了互操作性挑战,而包括来自4个国家和两个不同大陆的患者则确保了不同的人口背景。人工智能实现了胃肠病学级别的小肠病变识别,在病变检测和表征方面超越了传统的阅读方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-Life Clinical Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Detection and Differentiation of Pleomorphic Lesions in Capsule Endoscopy.

Introduction: Capsule endoscopy (CapE) is a minimally invasive procedure designed for small bowels' evaluation. However, prolonged reading times and a risk of missing clinically significant findings limit its potential. Prospective clinical validation studies of artificial intelligence (AI) for CapE remain scarce. Furthermore, existing studies focus on lesion detection, without addressing lesion differentiation.

Methods: The aim of a multicenter prospective validation study was to compare AI-assisted reading with conventional CapE reading. Three hundred thirty CapE videos from 3 devices across 7 centers and 4 countries were included. After conventional reading reports, AI-assisted reading was performed by an independent expert using a deep learning model to detect and differentiate pleomorphic small bowel lesions. Both reports were reviewed by an expert from an independent center, which decided in discrepant cases. AI-assisted and standard readings were evaluated through their accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and small bowel lesion detection rate.

Results: AI-assisted reading detected 605 of 635 lesions identified by expert-based consensus, whereas standard reading identified 354 lesions. AI-assisted reading outperformed standard reading, with small bowel lesion detection rate of 96.1% vs 76.3% and sensitivity of 97.5% vs 78.2%. AI-assisted reading had a mean examination reading time of 203 seconds per examination.

Discussion: This was the first multicentric study proving AI-assisted CapE reading superiority compared with conventional reading. The inclusion of videos from multiple devices addresses the interoperability challenge, whereas including patients from 4 countries and 2 different continents assures a diverse demographic context. AI achieved gastroenterologist-level identification of small-bowel lesions, surpassing conventional reading methods in both lesion detection and characterization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信