产前青霉素过敏评价的安全性、有效性和可接受性:一项系统综述。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lindsay Reddeman, Justin W J Lim, Kellie E Murphy, David Fahmy, Chris Walsh, Kristin Harris
{"title":"产前青霉素过敏评价的安全性、有效性和可接受性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Lindsay Reddeman, Justin W J Lim, Kellie E Murphy, David Fahmy, Chris Walsh, Kristin Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 8% to 13% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy. Penicillins and other beta-lactams are widely used in pregnancy but are often avoided in these patients, resulting in suboptimal therapy, antimicrobial resistance, higher costs, and increased morbidity for patients and neonates. True penicillin allergy is rare, and 95% of unverified penicillin allergies are delabeled upon evaluation. Although penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and recommended for pregnant patients, few patients are assessed. Research concerning antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation is accelerating, and we undertook a systematic review to summarize this growing body of evidence for obstetrical providers. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (ahead-of-print and non-Medline records), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in collaboration with a medical information specialist. There were no restrictions on study language, date, or design. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant people reporting an unverified penicillin allergy and undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation with ≥5 participants were included. Case reports, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies regarding desensitization of verified penicillin-allergic patients were excluded. Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction were completed independently by 2 authors. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. Studies were evaluated using validated quality assessment tools. Nineteen studies (N=2085) were eligible for inclusion. In total, 1956 (93.81%) participants were delabeled through various approaches: direct oral challenge (18.61%), penicillin skin test and oral challenge (51.12%), penicillin skin test and intravenous challenge (2.97%), penicillin skin test alone (18.00%), history review (1.94%), and unspecified methods (7.41%). Acceptance of penicillin allergy evaluation was 60.88%. Overall, 17 mild and 8 mild delayed allergy-related adverse reactions occurred, requiring minimal intervention. There were 3 severe allergy-related adverse reactions: 2 participants experienced anaphylaxis (managed with intramuscular epinephrine and observation), and 1 patient had mild drug-induced hepatitis (resolved with observation). No hospital transfers were required. No adverse antenatal events were recorded. Penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients. The case is strong for expanding access to optimize antimicrobial therapy, reduce antibiotic resistance, and improve outcomes for pregnant people and neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Reddeman, Justin W J Lim, Kellie E Murphy, David Fahmy, Chris Walsh, Kristin Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Approximately 8% to 13% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy. Penicillins and other beta-lactams are widely used in pregnancy but are often avoided in these patients, resulting in suboptimal therapy, antimicrobial resistance, higher costs, and increased morbidity for patients and neonates. True penicillin allergy is rare, and 95% of unverified penicillin allergies are delabeled upon evaluation. Although penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and recommended for pregnant patients, few patients are assessed. Research concerning antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation is accelerating, and we undertook a systematic review to summarize this growing body of evidence for obstetrical providers. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (ahead-of-print and non-Medline records), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in collaboration with a medical information specialist. There were no restrictions on study language, date, or design. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant people reporting an unverified penicillin allergy and undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation with ≥5 participants were included. Case reports, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies regarding desensitization of verified penicillin-allergic patients were excluded. Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction were completed independently by 2 authors. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. Studies were evaluated using validated quality assessment tools. Nineteen studies (N=2085) were eligible for inclusion. In total, 1956 (93.81%) participants were delabeled through various approaches: direct oral challenge (18.61%), penicillin skin test and oral challenge (51.12%), penicillin skin test and intravenous challenge (2.97%), penicillin skin test alone (18.00%), history review (1.94%), and unspecified methods (7.41%). Acceptance of penicillin allergy evaluation was 60.88%. Overall, 17 mild and 8 mild delayed allergy-related adverse reactions occurred, requiring minimal intervention. There were 3 severe allergy-related adverse reactions: 2 participants experienced anaphylaxis (managed with intramuscular epinephrine and observation), and 1 patient had mild drug-induced hepatitis (resolved with observation). No hospital transfers were required. No adverse antenatal events were recorded. Penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients. The case is strong for expanding access to optimize antimicrobial therapy, reduce antibiotic resistance, and improve outcomes for pregnant people and neonates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:约8-13%的孕妇报告青霉素过敏。青霉素和其他β -内酰胺类药物广泛用于妊娠,但这些患者通常避免使用,导致治疗不理想、抗微生物药物耐药性、成本较高以及患者和新生儿发病率增加。真正的青霉素过敏是罕见的,95%未经证实的青霉素过敏在评估时被去除标签。虽然青霉素过敏评价是安全的,建议孕妇进行,但很少进行评估。关于产前青霉素过敏评估的研究正在加速,我们进行了系统的回顾,以总结这一日益增长的证据,为产科提供者。数据来源:与一位医学信息专家合作,对Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane中央对照试验登记、PubMed印刷前和非Medline以及clinicaltrials.gov进行了全面搜索。没有对研究语言、日期或设计的限制。研究资格标准:所有同行评审的孕妇报告未经证实的青霉素过敏,并进行青霉素过敏评估,参与者≥5人。排除了病例报告、非同行评议来源和关于青霉素过敏患者脱敏的研究。研究评价与综合方法:题目/摘要综述、全文综述、数据提取均由两位作者独立完成。冲突由第三位作者解决。使用经过验证的质量评估工具对研究进行评估。结果:19项研究(N=2085)符合纳入条件。共有1956名(93.81%)参与者通过各种方法去标签:直接口服给药(18.61%)、青霉素皮试和口服给药(51.12%)、青霉素皮试和静脉给药(2.97%)、青霉素皮试单独给药(18.00%)、病史回顾(1.94%)和未指定方法(7.41%)。青霉素过敏评价接受率为60.88%。总体而言,发生了17例轻度和8例轻度延迟性过敏相关不良反应,需要最少的干预。有3个严重的过敏相关不良反应:2名参与者出现过敏反应(肌肉注射肾上腺素和观察);1例轻度药物性肝炎(经观察痊愈)。不需要转院。没有不良的产前事件记录。结论:妊娠期青霉素过敏评价是安全、有效、可接受的。有充分理由支持扩大获取途径,优化抗微生物药物治疗,减少抗生素耐药性,改善孕妇和新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation: a systematic review.

Approximately 8% to 13% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy. Penicillins and other beta-lactams are widely used in pregnancy but are often avoided in these patients, resulting in suboptimal therapy, antimicrobial resistance, higher costs, and increased morbidity for patients and neonates. True penicillin allergy is rare, and 95% of unverified penicillin allergies are delabeled upon evaluation. Although penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and recommended for pregnant patients, few patients are assessed. Research concerning antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation is accelerating, and we undertook a systematic review to summarize this growing body of evidence for obstetrical providers. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (ahead-of-print and non-Medline records), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in collaboration with a medical information specialist. There were no restrictions on study language, date, or design. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant people reporting an unverified penicillin allergy and undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation with ≥5 participants were included. Case reports, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies regarding desensitization of verified penicillin-allergic patients were excluded. Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction were completed independently by 2 authors. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. Studies were evaluated using validated quality assessment tools. Nineteen studies (N=2085) were eligible for inclusion. In total, 1956 (93.81%) participants were delabeled through various approaches: direct oral challenge (18.61%), penicillin skin test and oral challenge (51.12%), penicillin skin test and intravenous challenge (2.97%), penicillin skin test alone (18.00%), history review (1.94%), and unspecified methods (7.41%). Acceptance of penicillin allergy evaluation was 60.88%. Overall, 17 mild and 8 mild delayed allergy-related adverse reactions occurred, requiring minimal intervention. There were 3 severe allergy-related adverse reactions: 2 participants experienced anaphylaxis (managed with intramuscular epinephrine and observation), and 1 patient had mild drug-induced hepatitis (resolved with observation). No hospital transfers were required. No adverse antenatal events were recorded. Penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients. The case is strong for expanding access to optimize antimicrobial therapy, reduce antibiotic resistance, and improve outcomes for pregnant people and neonates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信