全基因组测序用于胎儿结构异常的产前评估:一项前瞻性多中心研究。

IF 8.4 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Zhi Gao, Meimei Liu, Jinna Jiang, Xiaofeng Yang, Yimei Li, Ying Zhang, Yanfei Wang, Chunxiao Hua, Ning Liu, Xiaofan Zhu, Xiangdong Kong
{"title":"全基因组测序用于胎儿结构异常的产前评估:一项前瞻性多中心研究。","authors":"Zhi Gao, Meimei Liu, Jinna Jiang, Xiaofeng Yang, Yimei Li, Ying Zhang, Yanfei Wang, Chunxiao Hua, Ning Liu, Xiaofan Zhu, Xiangdong Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical validity of whole-genome sequencing in postnatal settings is well documented, but studies of its use in prenatal settings are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance of whole-genome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies compared with the commonly used testing strategy of copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Whole-genome sequencing was performed in parallel with copy-number variant sequencing and exome sequencing for 96 parent-fetus trios with fetal structural anomalies. Single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, copy-number variations, structural variants, and absence of heterozygosity were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Association for Molecular Pathology, and ClinGen guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic variants were found by copy-number variant sequencing for 5/96 (5.2%) fetuses and by trio-exome sequencing for 26/96 (27.1%) fetuses. The combined diagnostic rate for copy-number variant sequencing plus trio-exome sequencing was 30/96 (31.2%). Whole-genome sequencing identified all diagnostic variants detected by copy-number variant sequencing and trio-exome sequencing plus 3 additional fetuses (one with maternal uniparental disomy 15, one with a complex chromosomal rearrangement, and one with compound heterozygous single-nucleotide variants in NADSYN1), increasing the diagnostic rate to 33/96 (34.4%). The highest diagnostic rate was observed in fetuses with craniofacial abnormalities (2/3, 66.7%), followed by those with hydrops (3/6, 50.0%). Ten families (10.5%, 10/96) were detected with incidental findings, of which, structural variants in 7 fetuses were detected only by whole-genome sequencing, including 6 inversions and one uniparental disomy 16.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trio-based whole-genome sequencing offers a valid alternative to copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing, demonstrating the capacity for more comprehensive genomic analysis for fetuses with structural anomalies while permitting consolidation of laboratory workflows into a single test.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whole-genome sequencing for the prenatal evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhi Gao, Meimei Liu, Jinna Jiang, Xiaofeng Yang, Yimei Li, Ying Zhang, Yanfei Wang, Chunxiao Hua, Ning Liu, Xiaofan Zhu, Xiangdong Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical validity of whole-genome sequencing in postnatal settings is well documented, but studies of its use in prenatal settings are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance of whole-genome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies compared with the commonly used testing strategy of copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Whole-genome sequencing was performed in parallel with copy-number variant sequencing and exome sequencing for 96 parent-fetus trios with fetal structural anomalies. Single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, copy-number variations, structural variants, and absence of heterozygosity were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Association for Molecular Pathology, and ClinGen guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic variants were found by copy-number variant sequencing for 5/96 (5.2%) fetuses and by trio-exome sequencing for 26/96 (27.1%) fetuses. The combined diagnostic rate for copy-number variant sequencing plus trio-exome sequencing was 30/96 (31.2%). Whole-genome sequencing identified all diagnostic variants detected by copy-number variant sequencing and trio-exome sequencing plus 3 additional fetuses (one with maternal uniparental disomy 15, one with a complex chromosomal rearrangement, and one with compound heterozygous single-nucleotide variants in NADSYN1), increasing the diagnostic rate to 33/96 (34.4%). The highest diagnostic rate was observed in fetuses with craniofacial abnormalities (2/3, 66.7%), followed by those with hydrops (3/6, 50.0%). Ten families (10.5%, 10/96) were detected with incidental findings, of which, structural variants in 7 fetuses were detected only by whole-genome sequencing, including 6 inversions and one uniparental disomy 16.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trio-based whole-genome sequencing offers a valid alternative to copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing, demonstrating the capacity for more comprehensive genomic analysis for fetuses with structural anomalies while permitting consolidation of laboratory workflows into a single test.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全基因组测序(WGS)在产后环境中的临床有效性有很好的文献记载,但其在产前环境中的应用研究有限。目的:本研究的目的是前瞻性评估全基因组测序(WGS)在胎儿结构异常产前诊断中的表现,并与常用的拷贝数变异测序(CNV-seq)加外显子组测序(ES)的检测策略进行比较。研究设计:对96例胎儿结构异常的父母-胎儿三胞胎进行WGS、CNV-seq和ES并行检测。单核苷酸变异、小插入/缺失、拷贝数变异、结构变异和缺乏杂合性根据美国医学遗传学和基因组学学院、分子病理学协会和ClinGen指南进行分类。结果:5/96胎儿的CNV-seq(5.2%)和26/96胎儿的trio-ES(27.1%)发现诊断性变异。CNV-seq + trio-ES的联合诊断率为30/96(31.2%)。Trio-WGS鉴定了CNV-seq检测到的所有诊断变异,而trio-ES加另外3个胎儿(1个携带母体UPD15, 1个携带复杂染色体重排,1个携带NADSYN1复合杂合SNVs),将诊断率提高到33/96(34.4%)。颅面畸形胎儿诊断率最高(2/3,66.7%),积水胎儿次之(3/6,50.0%)。10个家族(10.5%,10/96)检测到偶然发现,其中7个胎儿仅通过3 - wgs检测到结构变异,包括6个倒置和1个UPD16。结论:基于trio的WGS提供了CNV-seq + ES的有效替代方案,证明了对结构异常胎儿进行更全面基因组分析的能力,同时允许将实验室工作流程整合到单个测试中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Whole-genome sequencing for the prenatal evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective multicenter study.

Background: The clinical validity of whole-genome sequencing in postnatal settings is well documented, but studies of its use in prenatal settings are limited.

Objective: The objective of this study was to prospectively evaluate the performance of whole-genome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies compared with the commonly used testing strategy of copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing.

Study design: Whole-genome sequencing was performed in parallel with copy-number variant sequencing and exome sequencing for 96 parent-fetus trios with fetal structural anomalies. Single-nucleotide variants, small insertions/deletions, copy-number variations, structural variants, and absence of heterozygosity were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Association for Molecular Pathology, and ClinGen guidelines.

Results: Diagnostic variants were found by copy-number variant sequencing for 5/96 (5.2%) fetuses and by trio-exome sequencing for 26/96 (27.1%) fetuses. The combined diagnostic rate for copy-number variant sequencing plus trio-exome sequencing was 30/96 (31.2%). Whole-genome sequencing identified all diagnostic variants detected by copy-number variant sequencing and trio-exome sequencing plus 3 additional fetuses (one with maternal uniparental disomy 15, one with a complex chromosomal rearrangement, and one with compound heterozygous single-nucleotide variants in NADSYN1), increasing the diagnostic rate to 33/96 (34.4%). The highest diagnostic rate was observed in fetuses with craniofacial abnormalities (2/3, 66.7%), followed by those with hydrops (3/6, 50.0%). Ten families (10.5%, 10/96) were detected with incidental findings, of which, structural variants in 7 fetuses were detected only by whole-genome sequencing, including 6 inversions and one uniparental disomy 16.

Conclusion: Trio-based whole-genome sequencing offers a valid alternative to copy-number variant sequencing plus exome sequencing, demonstrating the capacity for more comprehensive genomic analysis for fetuses with structural anomalies while permitting consolidation of laboratory workflows into a single test.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信