2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的胃肠和肝胆安全性

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的胃肠和肝胆安全性","authors":"Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中的长期胃肠道和肝胆安全性,并与其他口服降糖药进行比较。方法:采用TriNetX网络在2010-2020年间进行回顾性队列研究。在1:1的倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入230,415例患者(GLP-1 RAs与口服抗dms)。在5年内评估胃肠道(GI)和肝胆预后的风险比(hr)。结果:在每组230,415名匹配的患者中,GLP-1 RA的使用与胃轻瘫的高风险相关(HR=1.591)。讨论:在这项大型现实世界队列研究中,与其他口服糖尿病药物相比,GLP-1 RA治疗与最严重的胃肠道或肝胆结局风险增加无关。这些研究结果支持GLP-1 RAs在2型糖尿病患者的整体胃肠道和肝胆安全性,同时强调了对易感个体胃轻瘫和肠套叠的警惕。长期研究可以充分评估癌症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

Introduction: To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.

Results: Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Discussion: In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信