Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的胃肠和肝胆安全性","authors":"Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Chengu Niu, Kefang Sun, Jing Zhang, Ahmed Elkhapery, Kaiwen Zhu, Sheza Malik, Chao Xue, Patrick I Okolo\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Safety of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Introduction: To evaluate the long-term gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatobiliary safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with other oral antidiabetic medications.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX network was conducted between 2010 and 2020. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 230,415 patients were included in each group (GLP-1 RAs vs oral antidiabetes mellitus medications). Hazard ratios (HRs) for GI and hepatobiliary outcomes were assessed over 5 years.
Results: Among 230,415 matched patients per group, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a higher risk of gastroparesis (HR 1.591, P < 0.001) and intussusception (HR 1.383, P = 0.025) compared with oral antidiabetic therapy. There were no significant differences in acute pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or cholecystectomy rates between groups. Conversely, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased incidence of GI cancers. Lower hazard ratios were observed for pancreatic (HR 0.897, P = 0.038), gastric (HR 0.838, P = 0.034), esophageal (HR 0.741, P = 0.001), and colorectal cancer (HR 0.870, P = 0.001), although causality cannot be inferred. No significant differences were observed in biliary cancer or hepatocellular carcinoma.
Discussion: In this large real-world cohort study, GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased risk of most serious GI or hepatobiliary outcomes compared with other oral diabetes medications. These findings support the overall GI and hepatobiliary safety of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes, while underscoring the need for vigilance regarding gastroparesis and intussusception in susceptible individuals. Longer-term studies are warranted to fully evaluate cancer risk.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.