口服质子泵抑制剂对降低5种上消化道内镜治疗中延迟性出血风险的影响。

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hiroko Abe, Waku Hatta, Kunio Tarasawa, Yutaka Hatayama, Yohei Ogata, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Tomoyuki Koike, Akira Imatani, Shin Hamada, Kenji Fujimori, Kiyohide Fushimi, Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"口服质子泵抑制剂对降低5种上消化道内镜治疗中延迟性出血风险的影响。","authors":"Hiroko Abe, Waku Hatta, Kunio Tarasawa, Yutaka Hatayama, Yohei Ogata, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Tomoyuki Koike, Akira Imatani, Shin Hamada, Kenji Fujimori, Kiyohide Fushimi, Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often prescribed for reducing delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments, no studies with a sufficient sample size evaluated its reduced effect compared with absence of acid-suppressive agents. This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral PPI on reducing delayed bleeding in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study collected data from patients who were either prescribed with PPIs or received no acid-suppressive therapy and who underwent esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection (E-EMR), esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD), gastric endoscopic mucosal resection (G-EMR), gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (G-ESD), or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in Japan between 2012 and 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding in each procedure. We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to balance two comparison groups and performed logistic regression analyses to compare bleeding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included data on 172,635 patients. After PSM, the delayed bleeding risk with PPI use was significantly lower in G-EMR (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.84) and G-ESD (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50). In contrast, a lower delayed bleeding risk of PPI was not observed in E-EMR (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), E-ESD (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38), and PEG (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13). The subgroup and sensitivity analyses almost consistently confirmed the main results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral PPI administration contributed to reducing delayed bleeding risk in G-EMR and G-ESD, but not in E-EMR, E-ESD, and PEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of oral proton pump inhibitor administration on reducing the delayed bleeding risk in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroko Abe, Waku Hatta, Kunio Tarasawa, Yutaka Hatayama, Yohei Ogata, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Tomoyuki Koike, Akira Imatani, Shin Hamada, Kenji Fujimori, Kiyohide Fushimi, Atsushi Masamune\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often prescribed for reducing delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments, no studies with a sufficient sample size evaluated its reduced effect compared with absence of acid-suppressive agents. This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral PPI on reducing delayed bleeding in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based cohort study collected data from patients who were either prescribed with PPIs or received no acid-suppressive therapy and who underwent esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection (E-EMR), esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD), gastric endoscopic mucosal resection (G-EMR), gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (G-ESD), or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in Japan between 2012 and 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding in each procedure. We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to balance two comparison groups and performed logistic regression analyses to compare bleeding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included data on 172,635 patients. After PSM, the delayed bleeding risk with PPI use was significantly lower in G-EMR (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.84) and G-ESD (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50). In contrast, a lower delayed bleeding risk of PPI was not observed in E-EMR (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), E-ESD (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38), and PEG (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13). The subgroup and sensitivity analyses almost consistently confirmed the main results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral PPI administration contributed to reducing delayed bleeding risk in G-EMR and G-ESD, but not in E-EMR, E-ESD, and PEG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003746\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然质子泵抑制剂(PPI)经常被用于减少上消化道内镜治疗中的延迟性出血,但没有足够样本量的研究评估其与不使用抑酸药物相比的减少效果。本研究旨在探讨口服PPI在5种上消化道内镜治疗中减少延迟性出血的效果。方法:这项基于人群的队列研究收集了2012年至2022年间在日本接受PPIs或未接受抑酸治疗并接受食管内镜粘膜切除术(E-EMR)、食管内镜粘膜下剥离(E-ESD)、胃内镜粘膜切除术(G-EMR)、胃内镜粘膜下剥离(G-ESD)或经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)的患者的数据,这些患者来自诊断程序组合数据库。每次手术的主要结果是延迟出血。我们进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡两个对照组,并进行逻辑回归分析来比较出血结果。结果:该研究纳入了172,635例患者的数据。PSM后,使用PPI的延迟出血风险在G-EMR(优势比[OR], 0.66; 95%可信区间[CI], 0.52-0.84)和G-ESD (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50)中显著降低。相比之下,在E-EMR (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99)、E-ESD (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38)和PEG (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13)中未观察到PPI较低的延迟出血风险。亚组分析和敏感性分析几乎一致地证实了主要结果。结论:口服PPI有助于降低G-EMR和G-ESD患者的延迟性出血风险,但对E-EMR、E-ESD和PEG患者没有作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of oral proton pump inhibitor administration on reducing the delayed bleeding risk in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.

Objective: Although proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is often prescribed for reducing delayed bleeding in upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments, no studies with a sufficient sample size evaluated its reduced effect compared with absence of acid-suppressive agents. This study aimed to investigate the effect of oral PPI on reducing delayed bleeding in five upper gastrointestinal endoscopic treatments.

Methods: This population-based cohort study collected data from patients who were either prescribed with PPIs or received no acid-suppressive therapy and who underwent esophageal endoscopic mucosal resection (E-EMR), esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (E-ESD), gastric endoscopic mucosal resection (G-EMR), gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (G-ESD), or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in Japan between 2012 and 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding in each procedure. We conducted propensity score matching (PSM) to balance two comparison groups and performed logistic regression analyses to compare bleeding outcomes.

Results: This study included data on 172,635 patients. After PSM, the delayed bleeding risk with PPI use was significantly lower in G-EMR (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-0.84) and G-ESD (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.30-0.50). In contrast, a lower delayed bleeding risk of PPI was not observed in E-EMR (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.99), E-ESD (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86-1.38), and PEG (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.93-1.13). The subgroup and sensitivity analyses almost consistently confirmed the main results.

Conclusions: Oral PPI administration contributed to reducing delayed bleeding risk in G-EMR and G-ESD, but not in E-EMR, E-ESD, and PEG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信