Catherine A. Callaway, Joshua M. Varghese, Emma R. Agnew, Laurel D. Sarfan, Allison G. Harvey
{"title":"对两代培训师培训质量和提供者成果的考察。","authors":"Catherine A. Callaway, Joshua M. Varghese, Emma R. Agnew, Laurel D. Sarfan, Allison G. Harvey","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Train-the-trainer (TTT) is a promising method for implementing and sustaining evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) in routine practice. In TTT, external “expert” trainers train an initial provider cohort (i.e., Generation 1) and then train “local” trainers to train the next provider cohort (i.e., Generation 2). This study evaluated whether training quality and provider outcomes are maintained across two generations of TTT in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. TTT was used to implement the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers (CMHCs) across California, United States. CMHCs were randomized to receive training in either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Data from both conditions were combined to maximize power. Two expert trainers trained 115 providers (Generation 1), and 25 local trainers trained 42 providers (Generation 2). Trainings were coded for gold standard training elements (TranS-C content, training techniques) using the Gold Standard Training Checklist. Providers completed a post-training assessment which measured TranS-C knowledge, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of TranS-C, and willingness and confidence to use TranS-C. Local trainers delivered more gold standard training techniques than expert trainers. No differences were found between generations on provider outcomes after correcting for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers revealed that providers trained in Generation 2 rated TranS-C as more appropriate to their setting. The extent of gold standard elements delivered in trainings were not related to provider outcomes. These findings support the potential of TTT to sustain, and even improve, training quality and provider outcomes in a CMHC setting.</p><p>The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631) on 11 April 2019, https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631. This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osfregistrationsx7v38v1).</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"52 5","pages":"966 - 982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Examination of Training Quality and Provider Outcomes Across Two Generations of Train-the-Trainer\",\"authors\":\"Catherine A. Callaway, Joshua M. Varghese, Emma R. Agnew, Laurel D. Sarfan, Allison G. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Train-the-trainer (TTT) is a promising method for implementing and sustaining evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) in routine practice. In TTT, external “expert” trainers train an initial provider cohort (i.e., Generation 1) and then train “local” trainers to train the next provider cohort (i.e., Generation 2). This study evaluated whether training quality and provider outcomes are maintained across two generations of TTT in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. TTT was used to implement the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers (CMHCs) across California, United States. CMHCs were randomized to receive training in either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Data from both conditions were combined to maximize power. Two expert trainers trained 115 providers (Generation 1), and 25 local trainers trained 42 providers (Generation 2). Trainings were coded for gold standard training elements (TranS-C content, training techniques) using the Gold Standard Training Checklist. Providers completed a post-training assessment which measured TranS-C knowledge, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of TranS-C, and willingness and confidence to use TranS-C. Local trainers delivered more gold standard training techniques than expert trainers. No differences were found between generations on provider outcomes after correcting for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers revealed that providers trained in Generation 2 rated TranS-C as more appropriate to their setting. The extent of gold standard elements delivered in trainings were not related to provider outcomes. These findings support the potential of TTT to sustain, and even improve, training quality and provider outcomes in a CMHC setting.</p><p>The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631) on 11 April 2019, https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631. This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osfregistrationsx7v38v1).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"52 5\",\"pages\":\"966 - 982\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Examination of Training Quality and Provider Outcomes Across Two Generations of Train-the-Trainer
Train-the-trainer (TTT) is a promising method for implementing and sustaining evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) in routine practice. In TTT, external “expert” trainers train an initial provider cohort (i.e., Generation 1) and then train “local” trainers to train the next provider cohort (i.e., Generation 2). This study evaluated whether training quality and provider outcomes are maintained across two generations of TTT in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. TTT was used to implement the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers (CMHCs) across California, United States. CMHCs were randomized to receive training in either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Data from both conditions were combined to maximize power. Two expert trainers trained 115 providers (Generation 1), and 25 local trainers trained 42 providers (Generation 2). Trainings were coded for gold standard training elements (TranS-C content, training techniques) using the Gold Standard Training Checklist. Providers completed a post-training assessment which measured TranS-C knowledge, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of TranS-C, and willingness and confidence to use TranS-C. Local trainers delivered more gold standard training techniques than expert trainers. No differences were found between generations on provider outcomes after correcting for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers revealed that providers trained in Generation 2 rated TranS-C as more appropriate to their setting. The extent of gold standard elements delivered in trainings were not related to provider outcomes. These findings support the potential of TTT to sustain, and even improve, training quality and provider outcomes in a CMHC setting.
The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631) on 11 April 2019, https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631. This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osfregistrationsx7v38v1).
期刊介绍:
The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles. The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues. The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like. Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.