{"title":"外上髁炎患者发生后骨间神经综合征的频率及其对临床结果的影响:一项前瞻性、对照、电生理研究。","authors":"Çiğdem Çilingiroğlu, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz, Şebnem Koldaş Doğan, Tuncay Çakır, Naciye Füsun Toraman, Gülşah Çelik","doi":"10.1007/s13760-025-02874-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain around the lateral epicondyle. Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS), a rare neuropathy caused by radial nerve compression, can mimic or coexist with LE, complicating diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the electrophysiological presence of PINS in LE and determine its impact on symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 62 patients diagnosed with LE and 54 healthy controls. Electrophysiological examinations were performed on all patients in the LE group to investigate the presence of PINS. Subsequently, PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients within the LE group underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including provocative tests, joint range of motion (ROM), hand grip strength, and symptom scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PINS was identified in 19.4% of LE patients and 1.9% of controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients in the LE group regarding provocative tests, joint ROM, grip strength, VAS, or PRTEE scores. The diagnosis of PINS was made solely based on electrophysiological findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of electrophysiological evaluation in the differential diagnosis of PINS and LE, especially in treatment-resistant cases. Although PINS did not significantly impact clinical parameters such as grip strength or symptom scores, its notable prevalence in LE patients underscores the need for its consideration in refractory LE cases. Further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to explore this relationship comprehensively.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency of posterior interosseous nerve syndrome and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, controlled, electrophysiological study.\",\"authors\":\"Çiğdem Çilingiroğlu, Meral Bilgilisoy Filiz, Şebnem Koldaş Doğan, Tuncay Çakır, Naciye Füsun Toraman, Gülşah Çelik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13760-025-02874-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain around the lateral epicondyle. Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS), a rare neuropathy caused by radial nerve compression, can mimic or coexist with LE, complicating diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the electrophysiological presence of PINS in LE and determine its impact on symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 62 patients diagnosed with LE and 54 healthy controls. Electrophysiological examinations were performed on all patients in the LE group to investigate the presence of PINS. Subsequently, PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients within the LE group underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including provocative tests, joint range of motion (ROM), hand grip strength, and symptom scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PINS was identified in 19.4% of LE patients and 1.9% of controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients in the LE group regarding provocative tests, joint ROM, grip strength, VAS, or PRTEE scores. The diagnosis of PINS was made solely based on electrophysiological findings.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study highlights the importance of electrophysiological evaluation in the differential diagnosis of PINS and LE, especially in treatment-resistant cases. Although PINS did not significantly impact clinical parameters such as grip strength or symptom scores, its notable prevalence in LE patients underscores the need for its consideration in refractory LE cases. Further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to explore this relationship comprehensively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02874-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02874-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frequency of posterior interosseous nerve syndrome and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis: A prospective, controlled, electrophysiological study.
Introduction: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain around the lateral epicondyle. Posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS), a rare neuropathy caused by radial nerve compression, can mimic or coexist with LE, complicating diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the electrophysiological presence of PINS in LE and determine its impact on symptoms.
Methods: This prospective study included 62 patients diagnosed with LE and 54 healthy controls. Electrophysiological examinations were performed on all patients in the LE group to investigate the presence of PINS. Subsequently, PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients within the LE group underwent a detailed clinical evaluation, including provocative tests, joint range of motion (ROM), hand grip strength, and symptom scoring using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE).
Results: PINS was identified in 19.4% of LE patients and 1.9% of controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between PINS-positive and PINS-negative patients in the LE group regarding provocative tests, joint ROM, grip strength, VAS, or PRTEE scores. The diagnosis of PINS was made solely based on electrophysiological findings.
Discussion: This study highlights the importance of electrophysiological evaluation in the differential diagnosis of PINS and LE, especially in treatment-resistant cases. Although PINS did not significantly impact clinical parameters such as grip strength or symptom scores, its notable prevalence in LE patients underscores the need for its consideration in refractory LE cases. Further large-scale, controlled studies are needed to explore this relationship comprehensively.
期刊介绍:
Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor.
Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies:
Belgian Neurological Society
Belgian Society for Neuroscience
Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society
Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis
Belgian Stroke Council
Belgian Headache Society
Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology