多发创伤患者肱骨干骨折的骨折类型、治疗和预后:一个病例系列。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
S H VAN Bergen, D DEN Hartog, M L Zeelenberg, E M M VAN Lieshout, M H J Verhofstad
{"title":"多发创伤患者肱骨干骨折的骨折类型、治疗和预后:一个病例系列。","authors":"S H VAN Bergen, D DEN Hartog, M L Zeelenberg, E M M VAN Lieshout, M H J Verhofstad","doi":"10.52628/91.2.14345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since most clinical studies on humeral shaft fractures exclude polytraumatized patients, the epidemiology in this population is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe the fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients. A case series with a single follow-up questionnaire was performed in patients aged 16 years or older with a humeral shaft fracture and an injury severity score of 16 or higher, admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2007, and July 31, 2021. Details on injuries, treatment, and clinical outcome were collected from the national trauma registry and medical records. Patients were asked to complete the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Short Form-36 (SF- 36). Twenty-nine patients were included. The median age was 41 years and 18 (62%) were male. Most fractures were type A (N=19; 66%). Most patients were treated operatively (N=26; 90%) within three days. Radial nerve palsy at presentation was reported in five (20%) patients. Infection occurred in one (4%) patient and nonunion in six (27%) patients. The patient-reported outcome measures were as follows (median; quartiles): DASH (20.0; P25-P75 5.6-35.2), EQ utility (0.75; P25-P75 0.58-0.88) and visual analog score (0.80; P25-P75 71-95), SF-36 physical (49; P25-P75 43- 55) and mental component summary (58; P25-P75 47-61). Humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients were most often AO-type A and treated operatively. Radial nerve palsy at presentation and nonunion rates were high. Patients still reported upper extremity disability at approximately five years post trauma. Level of evidence: Prognosis study Level IV: Case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"91 2","pages":"229-236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in polytraumatized patients: a case series.\",\"authors\":\"S H VAN Bergen, D DEN Hartog, M L Zeelenberg, E M M VAN Lieshout, M H J Verhofstad\",\"doi\":\"10.52628/91.2.14345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since most clinical studies on humeral shaft fractures exclude polytraumatized patients, the epidemiology in this population is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe the fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients. A case series with a single follow-up questionnaire was performed in patients aged 16 years or older with a humeral shaft fracture and an injury severity score of 16 or higher, admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2007, and July 31, 2021. Details on injuries, treatment, and clinical outcome were collected from the national trauma registry and medical records. Patients were asked to complete the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Short Form-36 (SF- 36). Twenty-nine patients were included. The median age was 41 years and 18 (62%) were male. Most fractures were type A (N=19; 66%). Most patients were treated operatively (N=26; 90%) within three days. Radial nerve palsy at presentation was reported in five (20%) patients. Infection occurred in one (4%) patient and nonunion in six (27%) patients. The patient-reported outcome measures were as follows (median; quartiles): DASH (20.0; P25-P75 5.6-35.2), EQ utility (0.75; P25-P75 0.58-0.88) and visual analog score (0.80; P25-P75 71-95), SF-36 physical (49; P25-P75 43- 55) and mental component summary (58; P25-P75 47-61). Humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients were most often AO-type A and treated operatively. Radial nerve palsy at presentation and nonunion rates were high. Patients still reported upper extremity disability at approximately five years post trauma. Level of evidence: Prognosis study Level IV: Case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"91 2\",\"pages\":\"229-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.2.14345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/91.2.14345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于大多数肱骨干骨折的临床研究排除了多发创伤患者,这一人群的流行病学在很大程度上是未知的。本研究的目的是描述成人多发创伤患者肱骨干骨折的骨折类型、治疗和预后。对2007年1月1日至2021年7月31日期间在一级创伤中心住院的16岁及以上的肱骨轴骨折患者进行了病例系列研究,并进行了单一随访问卷调查。损伤、治疗和临床结果的详细信息从国家创伤登记处和医疗记录中收集。患者被要求完成手臂,肩膀和手的残疾(DASH), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)和SF- 36 (SF- 36)。纳入29例患者。中位年龄为41岁,男性18人(62%)。骨折以A型为主(N=19, 66%)。大多数患者在3天内接受手术治疗(N=26; 90%)。5例(20%)患者在发病时出现桡神经麻痹。1例(4%)患者发生感染,6例(27%)患者发生骨不连。患者报告的结果测量如下(中位数;四分位数):DASH (20.0; P25-P75 5.6-35.2), EQ效用(0.75;P25-P75 0.58-0.88)和视觉模拟评分(0.80;P25-P75 71-95), SF-36物理评分(49;P25-P75 43- 55)和心理成分总结(58;P25-P75 47-61)。成人多发创伤患者肱骨干骨折多为ao型A型,手术治疗。桡神经麻痹的表现和不愈合率很高。患者在创伤后约5年仍报告上肢残疾。证据级别:预后研究IV级:病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in polytraumatized patients: a case series.

Since most clinical studies on humeral shaft fractures exclude polytraumatized patients, the epidemiology in this population is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to describe the fracture type, treatment, and outcome of humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients. A case series with a single follow-up questionnaire was performed in patients aged 16 years or older with a humeral shaft fracture and an injury severity score of 16 or higher, admitted to a level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2007, and July 31, 2021. Details on injuries, treatment, and clinical outcome were collected from the national trauma registry and medical records. Patients were asked to complete the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Short Form-36 (SF- 36). Twenty-nine patients were included. The median age was 41 years and 18 (62%) were male. Most fractures were type A (N=19; 66%). Most patients were treated operatively (N=26; 90%) within three days. Radial nerve palsy at presentation was reported in five (20%) patients. Infection occurred in one (4%) patient and nonunion in six (27%) patients. The patient-reported outcome measures were as follows (median; quartiles): DASH (20.0; P25-P75 5.6-35.2), EQ utility (0.75; P25-P75 0.58-0.88) and visual analog score (0.80; P25-P75 71-95), SF-36 physical (49; P25-P75 43- 55) and mental component summary (58; P25-P75 47-61). Humeral shaft fractures in adult polytraumatized patients were most often AO-type A and treated operatively. Radial nerve palsy at presentation and nonunion rates were high. Patients still reported upper extremity disability at approximately five years post trauma. Level of evidence: Prognosis study Level IV: Case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信