用于检测贝类和淡水中水生毒素的基于纳米材料的电化学感应传感器的最新进展的勘误。文献综述[j].天津大学学报，297(2026)128589。

IF 6.1 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL

Talanta Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.talanta.2025.128654

Girma Selale Geleta, Douglas P M Saraiva, Leonardo M A Ribeiro, Jian F S Pereira, Mauro Bertotti

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Corrigendum to 'Recent advances in nanomaterial-based electrochemical aptasensors for detecting aquatic toxins in shellfish and freshwater. A review' [Talanta 297 (2026) 128589].

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Talanta 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

12.30

自引率

4.90%

发文量

861

审稿时长

29 days

期刊介绍： Talanta provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, short communications, and critical reviews in all branches of pure and applied analytical chemistry. Papers are evaluated based on established guidelines, including the fundamental nature of the study, scientific novelty, substantial improvement or advantage over existing technology or methods, and demonstrated analytical applicability. Original research papers on fundamental studies, and on novel sensor and instrumentation developments, are encouraged. Novel or improved applications in areas such as clinical and biological chemistry, environmental analysis, geochemistry, materials science and engineering, and analytical platforms for omics development are welcome. Analytical performance of methods should be determined, including interference and matrix effects, and methods should be validated by comparison with a standard method, or analysis of a certified reference material. Simple spiking recoveries may not be sufficient. The developed method should especially comprise information on selectivity, sensitivity, detection limits, accuracy, and reliability. However, applying official validation or robustness studies to a routine method or technique does not necessarily constitute novelty. Proper statistical treatment of the data should be provided. Relevant literature should be cited, including related publications by the authors, and authors should discuss how their proposed methodology compares with previously reported methods.