低剂量地高辛改善心力衰竭、保留射血分数和房颤患者的心功能——RATE-AF随机试验。

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Karina V Bunting, Asgher Champsi, Simrat K Gill, Khalil Saadeh, A John Camm, Mary Stanbury, Sandra Haynes, Jonathon N Townend, Richard P Steeds, Dipak Kotecha
{"title":"低剂量地高辛改善心力衰竭、保留射血分数和房颤患者的心功能——RATE-AF随机试验。","authors":"Karina V Bunting, Asgher Champsi, Simrat K Gill, Khalil Saadeh, A John Camm, Mary Stanbury, Sandra Haynes, Jonathon N Townend, Richard P Steeds, Dipak Kotecha","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effect of digoxin versus beta-blockers on left ventricular function, in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptoms of heart failure within the RATE-AF randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Blinded echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up using a pre-defined imaging protocol and the index-beat approach. The change in systolic and diastolic function was assessed, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, 145 patients completed follow-up, with median age 75 years (interquartile range 69-82) and 44% women. In 119 patients with baseline LVEF ≥50%, a significantly greater improvement in systolic function was noted in patients randomized to low-dose digoxin versus beta-blockers: adjusted mean difference for LVEF 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001) and stroke volume 6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037), with no difference in global longitudinal strain (p = 0.11) or any diastolic parameters. There were no significant differences between groups for patients with LVEF 40-49% and <40%. Digoxin reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide compared to beta-blockers (geometric mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004), improved New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio [OR] 11.3, 95% CI 4.3-29.8; p < 0.001) and modified European Heart Rhythm Association arrhythmia symptom class (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.36-10.23; p < 0.001), with substantially less adverse events (incident rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). There were no interactions between treatment effects and baseline LVEF for these outcomes (interaction p = 0.62, 0.49, 0.07 and 0.13, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose digoxin in patients with symptoms of heart failure, preserved LVEF and permanent AF leads to a significantly greater improvement in systolic function compared to treatment with beta-blockers.</p>","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-dose digoxin improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation - the RATE-AF randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Karina V Bunting, Asgher Champsi, Simrat K Gill, Khalil Saadeh, A John Camm, Mary Stanbury, Sandra Haynes, Jonathon N Townend, Richard P Steeds, Dipak Kotecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the effect of digoxin versus beta-blockers on left ventricular function, in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptoms of heart failure within the RATE-AF randomized trial.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Blinded echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up using a pre-defined imaging protocol and the index-beat approach. The change in systolic and diastolic function was assessed, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, 145 patients completed follow-up, with median age 75 years (interquartile range 69-82) and 44% women. In 119 patients with baseline LVEF ≥50%, a significantly greater improvement in systolic function was noted in patients randomized to low-dose digoxin versus beta-blockers: adjusted mean difference for LVEF 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001) and stroke volume 6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037), with no difference in global longitudinal strain (p = 0.11) or any diastolic parameters. There were no significant differences between groups for patients with LVEF 40-49% and <40%. Digoxin reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide compared to beta-blockers (geometric mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004), improved New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio [OR] 11.3, 95% CI 4.3-29.8; p < 0.001) and modified European Heart Rhythm Association arrhythmia symptom class (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.36-10.23; p < 0.001), with substantially less adverse events (incident rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). There were no interactions between treatment effects and baseline LVEF for these outcomes (interaction p = 0.62, 0.49, 0.07 and 0.13, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose digoxin in patients with symptoms of heart failure, preserved LVEF and permanent AF leads to a significantly greater improvement in systolic function compared to treatment with beta-blockers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70022\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.70022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在RATE-AF随机试验中,比较地高辛与β受体阻滞剂对永久性心房颤动(AF)和心力衰竭患者左心室功能的影响。方法和结果:在基线和12个月的随访中,采用预先定义的成像方案和指数心跳方法进行盲法超声心动图。以左室射血分数(LVEF)分层评估收缩和舒张功能的变化。总体而言,145名患者完成了随访,中位年龄为75岁(四分位数范围为69-82岁),其中44%为女性。在119例基线LVEF≥50%的患者中,随机分配到低剂量地高辛与β受体阻滞剂的患者的收缩功能改善明显更大:LVEF调整后的平均差异为2.3%(95%置信区间[CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001)和卒中容积6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037),总体纵向应变(p = 0.11)或任何舒张参数无差异。LVEF为40-49%的患者组间无显著差异。结论:低剂量地高辛治疗有心衰症状、保留LVEF和永久性房颤的患者比使用受体阻滞剂治疗更能显著改善收缩功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-dose digoxin improves cardiac function in patients with heart failure, preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation - the RATE-AF randomized trial.

Aims: To compare the effect of digoxin versus beta-blockers on left ventricular function, in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF) and symptoms of heart failure within the RATE-AF randomized trial.

Methods and results: Blinded echocardiograms were performed at baseline and 12-month follow-up using a pre-defined imaging protocol and the index-beat approach. The change in systolic and diastolic function was assessed, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Overall, 145 patients completed follow-up, with median age 75 years (interquartile range 69-82) and 44% women. In 119 patients with baseline LVEF ≥50%, a significantly greater improvement in systolic function was noted in patients randomized to low-dose digoxin versus beta-blockers: adjusted mean difference for LVEF 2.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3-4.2; p = 0.021), s' 1.1 cm/s (95% CI 1.0-1.2; p = 0.001) and stroke volume 6.5 ml (95% CI 0.4-12.6; p = 0.037), with no difference in global longitudinal strain (p = 0.11) or any diastolic parameters. There were no significant differences between groups for patients with LVEF 40-49% and <40%. Digoxin reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide compared to beta-blockers (geometric mean difference 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004), improved New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio [OR] 11.3, 95% CI 4.3-29.8; p < 0.001) and modified European Heart Rhythm Association arrhythmia symptom class (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.36-10.23; p < 0.001), with substantially less adverse events (incident rate ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.13-0.31; p < 0.001). There were no interactions between treatment effects and baseline LVEF for these outcomes (interaction p = 0.62, 0.49, 0.07 and 0.13, respectively).

Conclusions: Low-dose digoxin in patients with symptoms of heart failure, preserved LVEF and permanent AF leads to a significantly greater improvement in systolic function compared to treatment with beta-blockers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信