免疫检查点抑制剂联合抗血管生成治疗作为小细胞肺癌的二线或二线治疗:疗效、安全性和预后生物标志物

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tong Chen, Wei Wang, Yuquan Qian, Mingzhao Wang, Yanchao Chen, Yang Cao, Xingsheng Hu, Xin Wang, Ning Li, Jun Jiang, Lin Yang, Bing Wang, Yutao Liu
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂联合抗血管生成治疗作为小细胞肺癌的二线或二线治疗:疗效、安全性和预后生物标志物","authors":"Tong Chen, Wei Wang, Yuquan Qian, Mingzhao Wang, Yanchao Chen, Yang Cao, Xingsheng Hu, Xin Wang, Ning Li, Jun Jiang, Lin Yang, Bing Wang, Yutao Liu","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options, especially after failure of initial therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic agents have emerged as promising options for relapsed SCLC. This observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy for relapsed SCLC patients, and to identify potential prognostic indicators. A single-center cohort of SCLC patients treated with ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy or anti-angiogenic monotherapy after first-line treatment was established. Efficacy and safety were compared between the two treatment modalities. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic biomarkers, including clinicopathological parameters, plasma proteomics, and extracellular vesicle (EV) membrane proteins, were evaluated using blood samples taken before and after two cycles of combination therapy. The observation and control groups comprised 40 and 21 patients. Baseline information was comparable. Combination therapy significantly improved PFS (4.0 vs. 2.7 months, p = .029) and DCR (77.5% vs. 52.4%, p = .044). Safety profiles were comparable between groups, with low rates of severe AEs. Four clinicopathological factors (liver metastases, baseline NSE levels, smoking history, and sex) and eight plasma proteins were associated with PFS and therapy response. EV membrane protein interleukin-12 was identified as a promising poor-prognosis biomarker. ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy showed promising efficacy and safety for relapsed SCLC, outperforming anti-angiogenic monotherapy. Clinicopathological factors and blood-based biomarkers have shown potential to predict PFS and response to combination treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy as second- or further-line treatment for small cell lung cancer: Efficacy, safety, and prognostic biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Chen, Wei Wang, Yuquan Qian, Mingzhao Wang, Yanchao Chen, Yang Cao, Xingsheng Hu, Xin Wang, Ning Li, Jun Jiang, Lin Yang, Bing Wang, Yutao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijc.70102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options, especially after failure of initial therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic agents have emerged as promising options for relapsed SCLC. This observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy for relapsed SCLC patients, and to identify potential prognostic indicators. A single-center cohort of SCLC patients treated with ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy or anti-angiogenic monotherapy after first-line treatment was established. Efficacy and safety were compared between the two treatment modalities. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic biomarkers, including clinicopathological parameters, plasma proteomics, and extracellular vesicle (EV) membrane proteins, were evaluated using blood samples taken before and after two cycles of combination therapy. The observation and control groups comprised 40 and 21 patients. Baseline information was comparable. Combination therapy significantly improved PFS (4.0 vs. 2.7 months, p = .029) and DCR (77.5% vs. 52.4%, p = .044). Safety profiles were comparable between groups, with low rates of severe AEs. Four clinicopathological factors (liver metastases, baseline NSE levels, smoking history, and sex) and eight plasma proteins were associated with PFS and therapy response. EV membrane protein interleukin-12 was identified as a promising poor-prognosis biomarker. ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy showed promising efficacy and safety for relapsed SCLC, outperforming anti-angiogenic monotherapy. Clinicopathological factors and blood-based biomarkers have shown potential to predict PFS and response to combination treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70102\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种侵袭性恶性肿瘤,治疗选择有限,特别是在初始治疗失败后。免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)和抗血管生成药物已成为复发性SCLC的有希望的选择。本观察性研究旨在评估ICIs联合抗血管生成治疗对复发性SCLC患者的有效性和安全性,并确定潜在的预后指标。建立了一线治疗后接受ICIs加抗血管生成治疗或单抗血管生成治疗的SCLC患者单中心队列。比较两种治疗方式的疗效和安全性。终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期、疾病控制率(DCR)、客观缓解率和不良事件(ae)。预后生物标志物,包括临床病理参数、血浆蛋白质组学和细胞外囊泡(EV)膜蛋白,通过在两个周期联合治疗前后采集的血液样本进行评估。观察组40例,对照组21例。基线信息具有可比性。联合治疗显著改善PFS(4.0个月vs. 2.7个月,p =。029)和DCR (77.5% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.044)。两组间的安全性比较,严重不良反应发生率较低。四种临床病理因素(肝转移、基线NSE水平、吸烟史和性别)和八种血浆蛋白与PFS和治疗反应相关。EV膜蛋白白介素-12被认为是一种很有前景的不良预后生物标志物。ICIs联合抗血管生成治疗对复发性SCLC显示出良好的疗效和安全性,优于抗血管生成单一治疗。临床病理因素和基于血液的生物标志物已经显示出预测PFS和对联合治疗的反应的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy as second- or further-line treatment for small cell lung cancer: Efficacy, safety, and prognostic biomarkers.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options, especially after failure of initial therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-angiogenic agents have emerged as promising options for relapsed SCLC. This observational study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy for relapsed SCLC patients, and to identify potential prognostic indicators. A single-center cohort of SCLC patients treated with ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy or anti-angiogenic monotherapy after first-line treatment was established. Efficacy and safety were compared between the two treatment modalities. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate, and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic biomarkers, including clinicopathological parameters, plasma proteomics, and extracellular vesicle (EV) membrane proteins, were evaluated using blood samples taken before and after two cycles of combination therapy. The observation and control groups comprised 40 and 21 patients. Baseline information was comparable. Combination therapy significantly improved PFS (4.0 vs. 2.7 months, p = .029) and DCR (77.5% vs. 52.4%, p = .044). Safety profiles were comparable between groups, with low rates of severe AEs. Four clinicopathological factors (liver metastases, baseline NSE levels, smoking history, and sex) and eight plasma proteins were associated with PFS and therapy response. EV membrane protein interleukin-12 was identified as a promising poor-prognosis biomarker. ICIs plus anti-angiogenic therapy showed promising efficacy and safety for relapsed SCLC, outperforming anti-angiogenic monotherapy. Clinicopathological factors and blood-based biomarkers have shown potential to predict PFS and response to combination treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信