Zoe A Odering, Jennifer Jordan, Cameron J Lacey, Christopher M Frampton, Richard J Porter, Katie M Douglas
{"title":"预测住院抑郁症患者治疗期间的认知变化:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。","authors":"Zoe A Odering, Jennifer Jordan, Cameron J Lacey, Christopher M Frampton, Richard J Porter, Katie M Douglas","doi":"10.1111/acps.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals hospitalized with depression are particularly impacted by cognitive impairment. Identifying variables that predict improvements in cognition across treatment may inform more targeted and effective treatment approaches. We conducted secondary analyses to investigate baseline predictors of objective cognitive change in a severely depressed inpatient sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 2 weeks of Activation Therapy (AT; Cognitive Activation combined with Behavioural Activation) with treatment-as-usual (TAU) was conducted in inpatients with major depression. Research assessments were conducted at baseline (on admission) and at 14 weeks (12 weeks after treatment-end). A series of analyses of covariance models were conducted to examine associations between change in executive functioning/attention, verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, and psychomotor speed, in global cognition, and a range of putative baseline predictor variables (e.g., demographic, mood, cognition, general functioning, childhood trauma) across the whole RCT sample. Treatment arm was included as a fixed factor in all models. Sensitivity analyses were run in the AT group only to examine predictors of cognitive change in those receiving this targeted cognitive treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight individuals completed baseline and follow-up cognitive testing assessments in the RCT (AT, n = 32, TAU, n = 36). Significantly poorer domain-specific baseline cognitive functioning was associated with greater cognitive improvement in all four domains. Older age was associated with less cognitive change in verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, psychomotor speed, and global cognition. Sensitivity analyses (AT group only) identified these same factors as significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age and domain-specific baseline cognitive performance were consistently associated with cognitive change in this RCT. Findings suggest that cognition seems to recover better in younger inpatients with poorer baseline cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ANZCTR], ACTRN12617000024347p.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Cognitive Change During Treatment for Inpatient Depression: Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zoe A Odering, Jennifer Jordan, Cameron J Lacey, Christopher M Frampton, Richard J Porter, Katie M Douglas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals hospitalized with depression are particularly impacted by cognitive impairment. Identifying variables that predict improvements in cognition across treatment may inform more targeted and effective treatment approaches. We conducted secondary analyses to investigate baseline predictors of objective cognitive change in a severely depressed inpatient sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 2 weeks of Activation Therapy (AT; Cognitive Activation combined with Behavioural Activation) with treatment-as-usual (TAU) was conducted in inpatients with major depression. Research assessments were conducted at baseline (on admission) and at 14 weeks (12 weeks after treatment-end). A series of analyses of covariance models were conducted to examine associations between change in executive functioning/attention, verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, and psychomotor speed, in global cognition, and a range of putative baseline predictor variables (e.g., demographic, mood, cognition, general functioning, childhood trauma) across the whole RCT sample. Treatment arm was included as a fixed factor in all models. Sensitivity analyses were run in the AT group only to examine predictors of cognitive change in those receiving this targeted cognitive treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight individuals completed baseline and follow-up cognitive testing assessments in the RCT (AT, n = 32, TAU, n = 36). Significantly poorer domain-specific baseline cognitive functioning was associated with greater cognitive improvement in all four domains. Older age was associated with less cognitive change in verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, psychomotor speed, and global cognition. Sensitivity analyses (AT group only) identified these same factors as significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age and domain-specific baseline cognitive performance were consistently associated with cognitive change in this RCT. Findings suggest that cognition seems to recover better in younger inpatients with poorer baseline cognitive functioning.</p><p><strong>Clinical registration: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ANZCTR], ACTRN12617000024347p.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70030\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:抑郁症住院患者尤其容易受到认知障碍的影响。识别预测治疗过程中认知改善的变量可能会为更有针对性和更有效的治疗方法提供信息。我们进行了二次分析,以调查严重抑郁症住院患者样本中客观认知变化的基线预测因素。方法:对重度抑郁症住院患者进行为期2周的激活疗法(AT;认知激活联合行为激活)与常规治疗(TAU)的随机对照试验(RCT)。研究评估在基线(入院时)和14周(治疗结束后12周)进行。通过一系列协方差模型分析,研究了整个RCT样本中执行功能/注意力、言语学习和记忆、视觉空间学习和记忆、精神运动速度、全球认知的变化与一系列假定的基线预测变量(如人口统计学、情绪、认知、一般功能、童年创伤)之间的关联。治疗组作为固定因素纳入所有模型。在AT组中进行敏感性分析,仅用于检查接受这种靶向认知治疗的患者的认知变化的预测因素。结果:68名受试者在RCT中完成了基线和随访认知测试评估(AT, n = 32, TAU, n = 36)。明显较差的领域特定基线认知功能与所有四个领域的认知改善有关。年龄越大,在言语学习和记忆、视觉空间学习和记忆、精神运动速度和整体认知方面的认知变化越少。敏感性分析(仅AT组)确定这些相同的因素为重要的预测因子。结论:在本随机对照试验中,年龄和特定领域的基线认知表现与认知变化一致相关。研究结果表明,基线认知功能较差的年轻住院患者的认知功能似乎恢复得更好。临床注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心[ANZCTR], ACTRN12617000024347p。
Predicting Cognitive Change During Treatment for Inpatient Depression: Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Introduction: Individuals hospitalized with depression are particularly impacted by cognitive impairment. Identifying variables that predict improvements in cognition across treatment may inform more targeted and effective treatment approaches. We conducted secondary analyses to investigate baseline predictors of objective cognitive change in a severely depressed inpatient sample.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 2 weeks of Activation Therapy (AT; Cognitive Activation combined with Behavioural Activation) with treatment-as-usual (TAU) was conducted in inpatients with major depression. Research assessments were conducted at baseline (on admission) and at 14 weeks (12 weeks after treatment-end). A series of analyses of covariance models were conducted to examine associations between change in executive functioning/attention, verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, and psychomotor speed, in global cognition, and a range of putative baseline predictor variables (e.g., demographic, mood, cognition, general functioning, childhood trauma) across the whole RCT sample. Treatment arm was included as a fixed factor in all models. Sensitivity analyses were run in the AT group only to examine predictors of cognitive change in those receiving this targeted cognitive treatment.
Results: Sixty-eight individuals completed baseline and follow-up cognitive testing assessments in the RCT (AT, n = 32, TAU, n = 36). Significantly poorer domain-specific baseline cognitive functioning was associated with greater cognitive improvement in all four domains. Older age was associated with less cognitive change in verbal learning and memory, visuospatial learning and memory, psychomotor speed, and global cognition. Sensitivity analyses (AT group only) identified these same factors as significant predictors.
Conclusion: Age and domain-specific baseline cognitive performance were consistently associated with cognitive change in this RCT. Findings suggest that cognition seems to recover better in younger inpatients with poorer baseline cognitive functioning.
Clinical registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ANZCTR], ACTRN12617000024347p.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.