利用软期限对抗垄断

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Masahiro Yoshida
{"title":"利用软期限对抗垄断","authors":"Masahiro Yoshida","doi":"10.1111/joie.12416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A monopolist often exploits a hard deadline to raise their commitment power. I explore whether a group of buyers can employ a soft deadline to counter the monopoly. Using a simple model of a durable goods monopolist under a deadline, I show that the buyers' imperfect commitment to exit early may elicit a big sale from the monopolist and generate the buyers' premium. The soft deadline partially restores the self-competition dynamics of the Coase conjecture, which was previously constrained by the hard deadline. In the conventional wisdom on the Coase conjecture, the shorter bargaining horizon (or, interpretably, less durability of goods) augments monopoly power. A soft deadline breaks this link: the horizon appears <i>shorter</i>, but the buyers may be better off in expectation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Economics","volume":"73 3","pages":"446-457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a Soft Deadline to Counter Monopoly\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joie.12416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A monopolist often exploits a hard deadline to raise their commitment power. I explore whether a group of buyers can employ a soft deadline to counter the monopoly. Using a simple model of a durable goods monopolist under a deadline, I show that the buyers' imperfect commitment to exit early may elicit a big sale from the monopolist and generate the buyers' premium. The soft deadline partially restores the self-competition dynamics of the Coase conjecture, which was previously constrained by the hard deadline. In the conventional wisdom on the Coase conjecture, the shorter bargaining horizon (or, interpretably, less durability of goods) augments monopoly power. A soft deadline breaks this link: the horizon appears <i>shorter</i>, but the buyers may be better off in expectation.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Economics\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"446-457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joie.12416\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joie.12416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

垄断者经常利用一个硬性的最后期限来提高他们的承诺能力。我探讨了一群买家是否可以采用软期限来对抗垄断。利用一个耐用品垄断者在截止日期下的简单模型,我证明了买方不完美的提前退出承诺可能会从垄断者那里引出一笔大买卖,并产生买方溢价。软截止日期部分地恢复了科斯猜想的自我竞争动态,这一动态先前受到硬截止日期的限制。在科斯猜想的传统智慧中,更短的讨价还价期限(或者,可以解释为,更少的商品耐用性)增强了垄断力量。软期限打破了这种联系:期限似乎更短,但买家的预期可能会更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using a Soft Deadline to Counter Monopoly

A monopolist often exploits a hard deadline to raise their commitment power. I explore whether a group of buyers can employ a soft deadline to counter the monopoly. Using a simple model of a durable goods monopolist under a deadline, I show that the buyers' imperfect commitment to exit early may elicit a big sale from the monopolist and generate the buyers' premium. The soft deadline partially restores the self-competition dynamics of the Coase conjecture, which was previously constrained by the hard deadline. In the conventional wisdom on the Coase conjecture, the shorter bargaining horizon (or, interpretably, less durability of goods) augments monopoly power. A soft deadline breaks this link: the horizon appears shorter, but the buyers may be better off in expectation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: First published in 1952, the Journal of Industrial Economics has a wide international circulation and is recognised as a leading journal in the field. It was founded to promote the analysis of modern industry, particularly the behaviour of firms and the functioning of markets. Contributions are welcomed in all areas of industrial economics including: - organization of industry - applied oligopoly theory - product differentiation and technical change - theory of the firm and internal organization - regulation - monopoly - merger and technology policy Necessarily, these subjects will often draw on adjacent areas such as international economics, labour economics and law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信