成人社区心理健康服务的自杀调查:减轻对组织学习障碍的指责恐惧

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Helen Haylor, Tony Sparkes, Gerry Armitage, Keith Double, Lisa Edwards
{"title":"成人社区心理健康服务的自杀调查:减轻对组织学习障碍的指责恐惧","authors":"Helen Haylor,&nbsp;Tony Sparkes,&nbsp;Gerry Armitage,&nbsp;Keith Double,&nbsp;Lisa Edwards","doi":"10.1111/inm.70136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective suicide prevention strategies in community mental health services demand high standards of patient safety. The nature of suicide is complex and uncertain. However, learning needs to be sensitive to the fear of blame. Little is known about how health services investigate suicides post hoc, how they examine why a suicide might have occurred, and how they generate any organisational learning that might improve patient safety. The aim of this novel qualitative study was to explore the accounts of key people involved in the serious incident investigation process regarding the subsequent organisational learning. Carers, clinicians, investigators and senior managers were recruited via regional and national networks; data were collected through focus groups and individual interviews. The dominant themes that emerged from this analysis did not reflect the tenor of the literature related to the investigative process and organisational learning, accepting that the literature is relatively sparse. A reflexive thematic analysis developed an understanding of mitigations against a fear of blame which appeared protective of all participants' positions, including those specific to suicide risk. We argue that mitigation operated as a barrier to organisational learning and improving patient safety in adult community mental health services. The findings are discussed in the context of organisational culture, learning and wider system thinking. The concept of mitigation against a fear of blame constructs new insights into this ambiguous and emotionally demanding sphere of patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70136","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicide Investigations in Adult Community Mental Health Services: Mitigation of the Fear of Blame as a Barrier to Organisational Learning\",\"authors\":\"Helen Haylor,&nbsp;Tony Sparkes,&nbsp;Gerry Armitage,&nbsp;Keith Double,&nbsp;Lisa Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Effective suicide prevention strategies in community mental health services demand high standards of patient safety. The nature of suicide is complex and uncertain. However, learning needs to be sensitive to the fear of blame. Little is known about how health services investigate suicides post hoc, how they examine why a suicide might have occurred, and how they generate any organisational learning that might improve patient safety. The aim of this novel qualitative study was to explore the accounts of key people involved in the serious incident investigation process regarding the subsequent organisational learning. Carers, clinicians, investigators and senior managers were recruited via regional and national networks; data were collected through focus groups and individual interviews. The dominant themes that emerged from this analysis did not reflect the tenor of the literature related to the investigative process and organisational learning, accepting that the literature is relatively sparse. A reflexive thematic analysis developed an understanding of mitigations against a fear of blame which appeared protective of all participants' positions, including those specific to suicide risk. We argue that mitigation operated as a barrier to organisational learning and improving patient safety in adult community mental health services. The findings are discussed in the context of organisational culture, learning and wider system thinking. The concept of mitigation against a fear of blame constructs new insights into this ambiguous and emotionally demanding sphere of patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70136\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70136\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社区精神卫生服务中有效的自杀预防策略需要高标准的患者安全。自杀的本质是复杂和不确定的。然而,学习需要对责备的恐惧敏感。关于卫生服务如何调查事后自杀事件,他们如何检查自杀可能发生的原因,以及他们如何产生任何可能改善患者安全的组织学习,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是探讨重大事件调查过程中涉及的关键人物对后续组织学习的描述。通过区域和国家网络招募护理人员、临床医生、调查人员和高级管理人员;通过焦点小组和个人访谈收集数据。从这一分析中出现的主要主题并没有反映与调查过程和组织学习相关的文献的基调,接受文献相对稀少的事实。反身性专题分析使人们对减轻对指责的恐惧有所了解,这种恐惧似乎保护了所有参与者的立场,包括那些具体涉及自杀风险的立场。我们认为,在成人社区精神卫生服务中,缓解是组织学习和提高患者安全的障碍。研究结果在组织文化、学习和更广泛的系统思维的背景下进行了讨论。减轻对指责的恐惧的概念构建了对患者安全这一模糊和情感要求领域的新见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicide Investigations in Adult Community Mental Health Services: Mitigation of the Fear of Blame as a Barrier to Organisational Learning

Effective suicide prevention strategies in community mental health services demand high standards of patient safety. The nature of suicide is complex and uncertain. However, learning needs to be sensitive to the fear of blame. Little is known about how health services investigate suicides post hoc, how they examine why a suicide might have occurred, and how they generate any organisational learning that might improve patient safety. The aim of this novel qualitative study was to explore the accounts of key people involved in the serious incident investigation process regarding the subsequent organisational learning. Carers, clinicians, investigators and senior managers were recruited via regional and national networks; data were collected through focus groups and individual interviews. The dominant themes that emerged from this analysis did not reflect the tenor of the literature related to the investigative process and organisational learning, accepting that the literature is relatively sparse. A reflexive thematic analysis developed an understanding of mitigations against a fear of blame which appeared protective of all participants' positions, including those specific to suicide risk. We argue that mitigation operated as a barrier to organisational learning and improving patient safety in adult community mental health services. The findings are discussed in the context of organisational culture, learning and wider system thinking. The concept of mitigation against a fear of blame constructs new insights into this ambiguous and emotionally demanding sphere of patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信