打破护理工作场所的欺凌循环

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Debra Jackson, Kim Usher
{"title":"打破护理工作场所的欺凌循环","authors":"Debra Jackson,&nbsp;Kim Usher","doi":"10.1111/inm.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There have been literally hundreds, if not thousands, of papers published on bullying in nursing. In the <i>International Journal of Mental Health Nursing</i> alone, a quick search suggests more than 80 papers have been published in the past 5 years that have in some way addressed bullying in nursing. A search of other nursing journals also reveals similarly high numbers of publications on bullying in the nursing literature. These publications represent the investment of the many thousands of hours of academic and clinical labour that have gone into researching the phenomenon. When we add to that the work that has been done on other workplace wrongdoing, such as horizontal violence, mobbing and workplace incivility, the extent of concern about bullying and workplace wrongdoing in nursing becomes clear. Yet, meaningful change remains elusive, and these behaviours continue to cause concern (Lessi et al. <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Writing in 2015, Hutchinson and Jackson noted that ‘healthcare and public sector institutions are high-risk settings for workplace bullying’ (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>, 13). Ten years later, work-based conflict in nursing continues to be a persistent and corrosive force, and one that takes a significant toll on individuals, teams and systems. Bullying has been identified as a factor contributing to poor mental health in nurses (Yang et al. <span>2024</span>). It affects multiple aspects of nursing and health care and even influences behaviour, such as speaking up for patient safety, and so therefore, potentially, bullying potentially influences patient outcomes (Park et al. <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Unfortunately, workplace conflict, such as bullying, incivility and interpersonal hostility, is not a rare disruption; rather, it is an everyday reality for too many nurses and is associated with a range of negative outcomes for those experiencing it, including distress, trauma, burnout, absenteeism, reduced levels of job satisfaction, intention to leave and attrition (Alharbi et al. <span>2023</span>; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz <span>2021</span>; Lessi et al. <span>2025</span>; Mohr et al. <span>2025</span>). Mental health nurses are not exempt from workplace bullying, and bullying from both colleagues and managers has been identified as a significant workplace challenge for mental health nurses (Cranage and Foster <span>2022</span>). The human cost of this insidious problem is significant, but so too is the economic cost, with lost productivity (Cullinan et al. <span>2020</span>) and considerable resources expended on investigating and managing complaints, mediating disputes and replacing staff lost to bullying (Ballard and Bozin <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Bullying in nursing has most often been framed as an interpersonal issue, a conflict between people who are positioned either as <i>victims</i> or <i>perpetrators</i>. This framing restricts our understanding and response, drawing attention away from the structural and cultural conditions that contribute to such behaviours and allow them to persist, sometimes for very long periods (Hutchinson et al. <span>2006</span>). It is now almost two decades since Hutchinson et al. (<span>2006</span>) drew attention to the need to move beyond individualised understandings of bullying in nursing and instead recognise it as a symptom of deeper organisational dysfunction, and one that is shaped by power relations, toxic workplace cultures and managerial practices that may both enable and obscure harmful behaviours (Hutchinson et al. <span>2010</span>). Though organisational cultures have been shown to be associated with workplace bullying (Peng et al. <span>2024</span>), this association is still not necessarily considered when workplace bullying occurs. This is likely because it is far easier for organisations to blame individuals rather than critique the organisational cultures, leadership practices and systemic stressors that often contribute to workplace bullying.</p><p>Persistent exposure to bullying has the potential to render the workplace psychologically unsafe and dysfunctional (Zhang et al. <span>2025</span>). In this editorial, we will reflect on bullying, how understandings of bullying have developed over time, the toll of bullying on individuals and the workplace, and consider ways that there could be a future for nursing that is free of workplace bullying.</p><p>The concept of bullying has attracted considerable attention from nurse researchers over the years, and understandings of what bullying is and why it occurs have continued to change and develop. Over time, the conceptualisation of workplace bullying has evolved from being viewed as isolated interpersonal conflicts or manifestations of oppressed group behaviour to recognising it as a complex phenomenon influenced by organisational structures and power dynamics (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>). As conceptual understandings have developed, so too have understandings of the importance of examining systemic factors and institutional cultures that perpetuate bullying, moving beyond individualistic explanations to more comprehensive, critical perspectives (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>).</p><p>To be considered workplace bullying, behaviour does not refer to an isolated event. Bullying is characterised by repeated and persistent behaviours, such as incivility, social exclusion and verbal or emotional aggression, that takes place and continues over time and acts to create a hostile work environment (Arnetz et al. <span>2019</span>). When considered individually, the acts may be considered trivial and minor, but when viewed in the context of duration and multiplicity of events, they are able to be recognised as a pattern of bullying. Bullying behaviours are designed to isolate, humiliate and punish a person, and over time a pattern of bullying can gradually undermine the confidence and well-being of the targeted individual, and this can result in the targeted person feeling isolated, vulnerable and powerless.</p><p>Arnetz et al. (<span>2019</span>, 1230) provided a concise and succinct definition: ‘Bullying is deliberate, persistent, negative actions (harassing, coercing, intimidating, dominating, oppressing, persecuting, tormenting) on the part of one person or a group of persons toward a particular individual’. While there is no universally agreed list of actions that constitute workplace bullying, it often includes behaviours such as yelling, speaking rudely, gossiping, belittling others, deliberately undermining someone's work or creating unnecessary stress and pressure (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>). These authors also describe more targeted and harmful actions like persistent surveillance, online shaming, attacks on a person's reputation or career opportunities and deliberate social exclusion. In some cases, formal systems, job responsibilities or organisational procedures are manipulated to cause harm, giving rise to forms of bullying that are deeply embedded within workplace power structures and institutional practices (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>).</p><p>People affected by bullying experience emotional and mental health consequences (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz <span>2021</span>). In a large Australian study of public sector employees, respondents described workplace bullying as having severe mental health consequences, with respondents reporting symptoms, such as anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>). Some respondents reported experiencing panic and distress when entering the workplace, while others required stress or sick leave to cope with the psychological impact of workplace bullying.</p><p>While attention is rightly given to the experiences of those who are bullied, it is also important to acknowledge that being accused of bullying, particularly when the claims are unfounded, can be equally traumatising, particularly where there is a sense that procedural fairness has not occurred (Jenkins et al. <span>2011</span>). The ripple effects of bullying can extend past the individuals directly involved. Teams can become damaged and fractured, and even though people involved in such situations are asked to maintain confidentiality, gossip and speculation can proliferate. Leaders can also be caught in the crossfire, and sometimes they themselves may feel unsupported. Staff who witness conflict may withdraw emotionally, disengage or begin to mistrust both colleagues and organisational processes. Real distress can result, especially when people feel unable to intervene or feel that complaints are mismanaged or not taken seriously or that the complaints process is being misused.</p><p>Despite decades of anti-bullying policies, the problem of workplace bullying in nursing remains concerning. This is not necessarily because the policies are flawed; generally, they are likely well-intentioned. However, policy on its own cannot meaningfully change cultures. Workplace culture is both shaped and reflected in the day-to-day interactions and dealings between those within the culture, in what is tolerated or not tolerated, and in how power and voice are distributed, heard and move through the organisation.</p><p>In order to meaningfully reduce the incidence and impact of work-based conflict and the damage it causes, there is a need to move beyond simple policy compliance into workplace transformation. Achieving this will require strong and emotionally intelligent leadership at every level of an organisation. We cannot assume that all leaders have the skills to achieve meaningful change, and so leaders must be supported and trained in relational approaches to performance management, courageous conversations and trauma-informed conflict resolution.</p><p>Effective management of bullying complaints is essential as the workplace can be seriously damaged when complaints are mismanaged. It really is important that the people and the systems charged with responding to bullying allegations are fair, transparent and timely. It is crucial that those investigating bullying allegations adopt a neutral position and not make assumptions based on one unsubstantiated version of events. When triaging complaints, it is also crucial to distinguish between bullying and other forms of interpersonal conflict and be able to differentiate between spurious complaints and genuine bullying. All parties involved need to be provided with immediate support once allegations are made, not just the complainant, and not only after an investigation has concluded.</p><p>Nurse researchers have provided the profession with many insights into bullying, including how and why it occurs and ways to recognise and respond to bullying, as well as ways to eradicate it. If we are serious about improving the health and emotional safety of our profession, we need more than policies and zero-tolerance statements. We need to take the lessons from the literature and use them to guide us through a process of cultural transformation that is grounded in relational ethics, strong and principled leadership and cultures of respect.</p><p>There is a need to move beyond performative (and often ineffective) policies toward authentic, compassionate relationship-centred cultures of care. Real and meaningful change is not just about reducing complaints or improving retention statistics. Real change is about honouring the humanity of nurses, who do some of the most important and emotionally demanding work in healthcare.</p><p>Nurses deserve workplaces where respect, fairness, compassion and justice are not aspirational, but foundational. Creating kinder, more compassionate workplaces and investing in emotionally intelligent leadership, team-based conflict resolution, ensuring adequate resources and manageable workloads offers a path forward. It is time to stop normalising dysfunction and start cultivating workplaces where nurses can thrive, not just survive.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70115","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the Cycle of Bullying in Nursing Workplaces\",\"authors\":\"Debra Jackson,&nbsp;Kim Usher\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There have been literally hundreds, if not thousands, of papers published on bullying in nursing. In the <i>International Journal of Mental Health Nursing</i> alone, a quick search suggests more than 80 papers have been published in the past 5 years that have in some way addressed bullying in nursing. A search of other nursing journals also reveals similarly high numbers of publications on bullying in the nursing literature. These publications represent the investment of the many thousands of hours of academic and clinical labour that have gone into researching the phenomenon. When we add to that the work that has been done on other workplace wrongdoing, such as horizontal violence, mobbing and workplace incivility, the extent of concern about bullying and workplace wrongdoing in nursing becomes clear. Yet, meaningful change remains elusive, and these behaviours continue to cause concern (Lessi et al. <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Writing in 2015, Hutchinson and Jackson noted that ‘healthcare and public sector institutions are high-risk settings for workplace bullying’ (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>, 13). Ten years later, work-based conflict in nursing continues to be a persistent and corrosive force, and one that takes a significant toll on individuals, teams and systems. Bullying has been identified as a factor contributing to poor mental health in nurses (Yang et al. <span>2024</span>). It affects multiple aspects of nursing and health care and even influences behaviour, such as speaking up for patient safety, and so therefore, potentially, bullying potentially influences patient outcomes (Park et al. <span>2025</span>).</p><p>Unfortunately, workplace conflict, such as bullying, incivility and interpersonal hostility, is not a rare disruption; rather, it is an everyday reality for too many nurses and is associated with a range of negative outcomes for those experiencing it, including distress, trauma, burnout, absenteeism, reduced levels of job satisfaction, intention to leave and attrition (Alharbi et al. <span>2023</span>; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz <span>2021</span>; Lessi et al. <span>2025</span>; Mohr et al. <span>2025</span>). Mental health nurses are not exempt from workplace bullying, and bullying from both colleagues and managers has been identified as a significant workplace challenge for mental health nurses (Cranage and Foster <span>2022</span>). The human cost of this insidious problem is significant, but so too is the economic cost, with lost productivity (Cullinan et al. <span>2020</span>) and considerable resources expended on investigating and managing complaints, mediating disputes and replacing staff lost to bullying (Ballard and Bozin <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Bullying in nursing has most often been framed as an interpersonal issue, a conflict between people who are positioned either as <i>victims</i> or <i>perpetrators</i>. This framing restricts our understanding and response, drawing attention away from the structural and cultural conditions that contribute to such behaviours and allow them to persist, sometimes for very long periods (Hutchinson et al. <span>2006</span>). It is now almost two decades since Hutchinson et al. (<span>2006</span>) drew attention to the need to move beyond individualised understandings of bullying in nursing and instead recognise it as a symptom of deeper organisational dysfunction, and one that is shaped by power relations, toxic workplace cultures and managerial practices that may both enable and obscure harmful behaviours (Hutchinson et al. <span>2010</span>). Though organisational cultures have been shown to be associated with workplace bullying (Peng et al. <span>2024</span>), this association is still not necessarily considered when workplace bullying occurs. This is likely because it is far easier for organisations to blame individuals rather than critique the organisational cultures, leadership practices and systemic stressors that often contribute to workplace bullying.</p><p>Persistent exposure to bullying has the potential to render the workplace psychologically unsafe and dysfunctional (Zhang et al. <span>2025</span>). In this editorial, we will reflect on bullying, how understandings of bullying have developed over time, the toll of bullying on individuals and the workplace, and consider ways that there could be a future for nursing that is free of workplace bullying.</p><p>The concept of bullying has attracted considerable attention from nurse researchers over the years, and understandings of what bullying is and why it occurs have continued to change and develop. Over time, the conceptualisation of workplace bullying has evolved from being viewed as isolated interpersonal conflicts or manifestations of oppressed group behaviour to recognising it as a complex phenomenon influenced by organisational structures and power dynamics (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>). As conceptual understandings have developed, so too have understandings of the importance of examining systemic factors and institutional cultures that perpetuate bullying, moving beyond individualistic explanations to more comprehensive, critical perspectives (Hutchinson and Jackson <span>2015</span>).</p><p>To be considered workplace bullying, behaviour does not refer to an isolated event. Bullying is characterised by repeated and persistent behaviours, such as incivility, social exclusion and verbal or emotional aggression, that takes place and continues over time and acts to create a hostile work environment (Arnetz et al. <span>2019</span>). When considered individually, the acts may be considered trivial and minor, but when viewed in the context of duration and multiplicity of events, they are able to be recognised as a pattern of bullying. Bullying behaviours are designed to isolate, humiliate and punish a person, and over time a pattern of bullying can gradually undermine the confidence and well-being of the targeted individual, and this can result in the targeted person feeling isolated, vulnerable and powerless.</p><p>Arnetz et al. (<span>2019</span>, 1230) provided a concise and succinct definition: ‘Bullying is deliberate, persistent, negative actions (harassing, coercing, intimidating, dominating, oppressing, persecuting, tormenting) on the part of one person or a group of persons toward a particular individual’. While there is no universally agreed list of actions that constitute workplace bullying, it often includes behaviours such as yelling, speaking rudely, gossiping, belittling others, deliberately undermining someone's work or creating unnecessary stress and pressure (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>). These authors also describe more targeted and harmful actions like persistent surveillance, online shaming, attacks on a person's reputation or career opportunities and deliberate social exclusion. In some cases, formal systems, job responsibilities or organisational procedures are manipulated to cause harm, giving rise to forms of bullying that are deeply embedded within workplace power structures and institutional practices (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>).</p><p>People affected by bullying experience emotional and mental health consequences (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz <span>2021</span>). In a large Australian study of public sector employees, respondents described workplace bullying as having severe mental health consequences, with respondents reporting symptoms, such as anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts (Hurley et al. <span>2016</span>). Some respondents reported experiencing panic and distress when entering the workplace, while others required stress or sick leave to cope with the psychological impact of workplace bullying.</p><p>While attention is rightly given to the experiences of those who are bullied, it is also important to acknowledge that being accused of bullying, particularly when the claims are unfounded, can be equally traumatising, particularly where there is a sense that procedural fairness has not occurred (Jenkins et al. <span>2011</span>). The ripple effects of bullying can extend past the individuals directly involved. Teams can become damaged and fractured, and even though people involved in such situations are asked to maintain confidentiality, gossip and speculation can proliferate. Leaders can also be caught in the crossfire, and sometimes they themselves may feel unsupported. Staff who witness conflict may withdraw emotionally, disengage or begin to mistrust both colleagues and organisational processes. Real distress can result, especially when people feel unable to intervene or feel that complaints are mismanaged or not taken seriously or that the complaints process is being misused.</p><p>Despite decades of anti-bullying policies, the problem of workplace bullying in nursing remains concerning. This is not necessarily because the policies are flawed; generally, they are likely well-intentioned. However, policy on its own cannot meaningfully change cultures. Workplace culture is both shaped and reflected in the day-to-day interactions and dealings between those within the culture, in what is tolerated or not tolerated, and in how power and voice are distributed, heard and move through the organisation.</p><p>In order to meaningfully reduce the incidence and impact of work-based conflict and the damage it causes, there is a need to move beyond simple policy compliance into workplace transformation. Achieving this will require strong and emotionally intelligent leadership at every level of an organisation. We cannot assume that all leaders have the skills to achieve meaningful change, and so leaders must be supported and trained in relational approaches to performance management, courageous conversations and trauma-informed conflict resolution.</p><p>Effective management of bullying complaints is essential as the workplace can be seriously damaged when complaints are mismanaged. It really is important that the people and the systems charged with responding to bullying allegations are fair, transparent and timely. It is crucial that those investigating bullying allegations adopt a neutral position and not make assumptions based on one unsubstantiated version of events. When triaging complaints, it is also crucial to distinguish between bullying and other forms of interpersonal conflict and be able to differentiate between spurious complaints and genuine bullying. All parties involved need to be provided with immediate support once allegations are made, not just the complainant, and not only after an investigation has concluded.</p><p>Nurse researchers have provided the profession with many insights into bullying, including how and why it occurs and ways to recognise and respond to bullying, as well as ways to eradicate it. If we are serious about improving the health and emotional safety of our profession, we need more than policies and zero-tolerance statements. We need to take the lessons from the literature and use them to guide us through a process of cultural transformation that is grounded in relational ethics, strong and principled leadership and cultures of respect.</p><p>There is a need to move beyond performative (and often ineffective) policies toward authentic, compassionate relationship-centred cultures of care. Real and meaningful change is not just about reducing complaints or improving retention statistics. Real change is about honouring the humanity of nurses, who do some of the most important and emotionally demanding work in healthcare.</p><p>Nurses deserve workplaces where respect, fairness, compassion and justice are not aspirational, but foundational. Creating kinder, more compassionate workplaces and investing in emotionally intelligent leadership, team-based conflict resolution, ensuring adequate resources and manageable workloads offers a path forward. It is time to stop normalising dysfunction and start cultivating workplaces where nurses can thrive, not just survive.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70115\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经有数百篇,如果不是数千篇,关于护理中的欺凌的论文发表了。仅在《国际心理健康护理杂志》(International Journal of Mental Health Nursing)上,快速搜索一下就会发现,在过去5年里,有80多篇论文以某种方式讨论了护理中的欺凌问题。对其他护理期刊的搜索也显示,在护理文献中,关于欺凌的出版物数量相似。这些出版物代表了对这一现象进行研究的数千小时的学术和临床劳动的投入。当我们再加上对其他工作场所不法行为(如横向暴力、围殴和工作场所不文明行为)所做的工作时,对护理中欺凌和工作场所不法行为的关注程度就变得清晰起来。然而,有意义的变化仍然难以捉摸,这些行为继续引起关注(Lessi et al. 2025)。Hutchinson和Jackson在2015年写道,“医疗保健和公共部门机构是工作场所欺凌的高风险场所”(Hutchinson和Jackson 2015,13)。十年后,护理工作中的冲突仍然是一种持久的腐蚀性力量,对个人、团队和系统造成了重大损失。欺凌已被确定为导致护士心理健康状况不佳的一个因素(Yang et al. 2024)。它影响护理和医疗保健的多个方面,甚至影响行为,例如为患者安全发声,因此,欺凌可能会影响患者的结果(Park et al. 2025)。不幸的是,职场冲突,如欺凌、无礼和人际敌意,并不是一种罕见的破坏;相反,对于太多护士来说,这是一个日常现实,并与经历过这种情况的人的一系列负面结果有关,包括痛苦、创伤、倦怠、旷工、工作满意度降低、离职意向和人员流失(Alharbi等人,2023;Fernández-Gutiérrez和Mosteiro-Díaz 2021; Lessi等人,2025;Mohr等人,2025)。心理健康护士也不能幸免于职场欺凌,来自同事和管理者的欺凌已被确定为心理健康护士面临的重大职场挑战(Cranage和Foster 2022)。这一潜在问题的人力成本是巨大的,但经济成本也是如此,生产力损失(Cullinan et al. 2020),以及大量资源被用于调查和管理投诉、调解纠纷和替换因欺凌而失去的员工(Ballard and Bozin 2023)。护理中的欺凌行为通常被定义为人际关系问题,即受害者或施暴者之间的冲突。这种框架限制了我们的理解和反应,将注意力从导致此类行为的结构和文化条件上引开,并允许它们持续存在,有时会持续很长时间(Hutchinson et al. 2006)。自Hutchinson et al.(2006)引起人们注意需要超越对护理中的欺凌行为的个体化理解,而是将其视为更深层次的组织功能障碍的症状,并且是由权力关系,有毒的工作场所文化和管理实践形成的,这些都可能使有害行为成为可能并使其模糊(Hutchinson et al. 2010)。虽然组织文化已被证明与工作场所欺凌有关(Peng et al. 2024),但当工作场所欺凌发生时,这种联系仍然不一定被考虑。这可能是因为,对组织来说,责备个人要比批评经常导致职场欺凌的组织文化、领导实践和系统性压力源容易得多。长期遭受欺凌有可能使工作场所在心理上不安全和功能失调(Zhang et al. 2025)。在这篇社论中,我们将反思欺凌,对欺凌的理解是如何随着时间的推移而发展的,欺凌对个人和工作场所的影响,并考虑如何实现一个没有工作场所欺凌的护理未来。多年来,欺凌的概念引起了护理研究人员的极大关注,对欺凌是什么以及为什么会发生欺凌的理解也在不断变化和发展。随着时间的推移,职场欺凌的概念已经从被视为孤立的人际冲突或被压迫群体行为的表现演变为将其视为受组织结构和权力动态影响的复杂现象(Hutchinson和Jackson 2015)。随着概念理解的发展,对检查使欺凌永久化的系统因素和制度文化的重要性的理解也在发展,超越个人主义的解释,转向更全面、更批判性的观点(Hutchinson和Jackson 2015)。 要被视为职场欺凌,行为并不是指孤立的事件。欺凌的特点是反复和持续的行为,如不礼貌、社会排斥、言语或情感攻击,这些行为会随着时间的推移而发生并持续下去,从而创造一个充满敌意的工作环境(Arnetz et al. 2019)。单独考虑时,这些行为可能被认为是微不足道的,但从事件持续时间和多样性的角度来看,它们就可以被视为一种欺凌行为。欺凌行为的目的是孤立、羞辱和惩罚一个人,随着时间的推移,欺凌模式会逐渐破坏目标个人的信心和福祉,这可能导致目标个人感到孤立、脆弱和无能为力。Arnetz等人(2019,1230)给出了一个简洁而简洁的定义:“欺凌是一个人或一群人对特定个体故意的、持续的、消极的行为(骚扰、胁迫、恐吓、支配、压迫、迫害、折磨)。”虽然职场霸凌行为的构成并没有一个普遍认可的清单,但它通常包括大喊大叫、说话粗鲁、说闲话、贬低他人、故意破坏他人的工作或制造不必要的压力和压力等行为(Hurley et al. 2016)。这些作者还描述了更有针对性和有害的行为,如持续监控、在线羞辱、攻击一个人的声誉或职业机会,以及故意的社会排斥。在某些情况下,正式制度、工作职责或组织程序被操纵以造成伤害,从而产生了深深植根于工作场所权力结构和制度实践中的各种形式的欺凌(Hurley et al. 2016)。受欺凌影响的人会经历情绪和心理健康后果(Hurley et al. 2016; Fernández-Gutiérrez和Mosteiro-Díaz 2021)。在澳大利亚对公共部门雇员进行的一项大型研究中,受访者将工作场所欺凌描述为具有严重的心理健康后果,受访者报告了焦虑、抑郁和自杀念头等症状(Hurley et al. 2016)。一些受访者表示,进入工作场所时会感到恐慌和痛苦,而另一些人则需要压力或病假来应对职场欺凌的心理影响。虽然关注那些被欺凌者的经历是正确的,但同样重要的是要承认,被指控欺凌,特别是在指控毫无根据的情况下,也可能同样受到创伤,特别是在没有发生程序公平的情况下(Jenkins et al. 2011)。霸凌的连锁反应可以延伸到直接相关的个人之外。团队可能会被破坏和分裂,即使参与这种情况的人被要求保密,流言和猜测也会激增。领导者也可能被卷入冲突,有时他们自己可能会感到不受支持。目睹冲突的员工可能会在情绪上退缩、脱离或开始不信任同事和组织流程。真正的痛苦可能会产生,特别是当人们感到无法干预或感到投诉管理不善或不被认真对待或投诉过程被滥用时。尽管有几十年的反欺凌政策,但护理工作场所欺凌问题仍然令人担忧。这并不一定是因为政策有缺陷;一般来说,他们可能是出于好意。然而,政策本身并不能有意义地改变文化。职场文化的形成和反映体现在文化内部人员之间的日常互动和交往中,体现在什么是被容忍的,什么是不被容忍的,体现在权力和声音如何在组织中分配、倾听和传播中。为了有意义地减少基于工作的冲突的发生率和影响及其造成的损害,有必要从简单的政策遵从转向工作场所转型。要实现这一目标,就需要在组织的各个层面都有强有力的、高情商的领导。我们不能假设所有的领导者都有实现有意义变革的技能,因此领导者必须在绩效管理、勇敢的对话和创伤知情的冲突解决等关系方法方面得到支持和培训。有效管理欺凌投诉至关重要,因为当投诉处理不当时,工作场所可能会受到严重损害。负责应对欺凌指控的人员和系统必须公平、透明和及时,这一点非常重要。至关重要的是,那些调查欺凌指控的人采取中立立场,而不是根据一个未经证实的事件版本做出假设。 在对投诉进行分类时,区分欺凌和其他形式的人际冲突,并能够区分虚假的投诉和真正的欺凌也至关重要。一旦提出指控,需要立即向所有有关各方提供支持,而不仅仅是申诉人,也不仅仅是在调查结束后。护士研究人员为该行业提供了许多关于欺凌的见解,包括欺凌发生的方式和原因,识别和应对欺凌的方法,以及根除欺凌的方法。如果我们真的想改善我们职业的健康和情感安全,我们需要的不仅仅是政策和零容忍声明。我们需要从文献中吸取教训,并利用它们来指导我们完成文化转型的过程,这种转型是以关系伦理、强有力的原则性领导和尊重文化为基础的。有必要超越表现性(通常是无效的)政策,转向真实的、富有同情心的、以关系为中心的护理文化。真正有意义的改变不仅仅是减少抱怨或改善留存率统计数据。真正的改变是尊重护士的人性,她们在医疗保健领域从事一些最重要、最需要情感的工作。护士应该得到尊重、公平、同情和正义不是愿望,而是基础的工作场所。创造更友善、更富有同情心的工作场所,投资于情商高的领导力、团队冲突解决方案,确保充足的资源和可管理的工作量,这些都是一条前进的道路。现在是时候停止将功能障碍正常化,并开始培养护士能够茁壮成长的工作场所,而不仅仅是生存。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the Cycle of Bullying in Nursing Workplaces

There have been literally hundreds, if not thousands, of papers published on bullying in nursing. In the International Journal of Mental Health Nursing alone, a quick search suggests more than 80 papers have been published in the past 5 years that have in some way addressed bullying in nursing. A search of other nursing journals also reveals similarly high numbers of publications on bullying in the nursing literature. These publications represent the investment of the many thousands of hours of academic and clinical labour that have gone into researching the phenomenon. When we add to that the work that has been done on other workplace wrongdoing, such as horizontal violence, mobbing and workplace incivility, the extent of concern about bullying and workplace wrongdoing in nursing becomes clear. Yet, meaningful change remains elusive, and these behaviours continue to cause concern (Lessi et al. 2025).

Writing in 2015, Hutchinson and Jackson noted that ‘healthcare and public sector institutions are high-risk settings for workplace bullying’ (Hutchinson and Jackson 2015, 13). Ten years later, work-based conflict in nursing continues to be a persistent and corrosive force, and one that takes a significant toll on individuals, teams and systems. Bullying has been identified as a factor contributing to poor mental health in nurses (Yang et al. 2024). It affects multiple aspects of nursing and health care and even influences behaviour, such as speaking up for patient safety, and so therefore, potentially, bullying potentially influences patient outcomes (Park et al. 2025).

Unfortunately, workplace conflict, such as bullying, incivility and interpersonal hostility, is not a rare disruption; rather, it is an everyday reality for too many nurses and is associated with a range of negative outcomes for those experiencing it, including distress, trauma, burnout, absenteeism, reduced levels of job satisfaction, intention to leave and attrition (Alharbi et al. 2023; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz 2021; Lessi et al. 2025; Mohr et al. 2025). Mental health nurses are not exempt from workplace bullying, and bullying from both colleagues and managers has been identified as a significant workplace challenge for mental health nurses (Cranage and Foster 2022). The human cost of this insidious problem is significant, but so too is the economic cost, with lost productivity (Cullinan et al. 2020) and considerable resources expended on investigating and managing complaints, mediating disputes and replacing staff lost to bullying (Ballard and Bozin 2023).

Bullying in nursing has most often been framed as an interpersonal issue, a conflict between people who are positioned either as victims or perpetrators. This framing restricts our understanding and response, drawing attention away from the structural and cultural conditions that contribute to such behaviours and allow them to persist, sometimes for very long periods (Hutchinson et al. 2006). It is now almost two decades since Hutchinson et al. (2006) drew attention to the need to move beyond individualised understandings of bullying in nursing and instead recognise it as a symptom of deeper organisational dysfunction, and one that is shaped by power relations, toxic workplace cultures and managerial practices that may both enable and obscure harmful behaviours (Hutchinson et al. 2010). Though organisational cultures have been shown to be associated with workplace bullying (Peng et al. 2024), this association is still not necessarily considered when workplace bullying occurs. This is likely because it is far easier for organisations to blame individuals rather than critique the organisational cultures, leadership practices and systemic stressors that often contribute to workplace bullying.

Persistent exposure to bullying has the potential to render the workplace psychologically unsafe and dysfunctional (Zhang et al. 2025). In this editorial, we will reflect on bullying, how understandings of bullying have developed over time, the toll of bullying on individuals and the workplace, and consider ways that there could be a future for nursing that is free of workplace bullying.

The concept of bullying has attracted considerable attention from nurse researchers over the years, and understandings of what bullying is and why it occurs have continued to change and develop. Over time, the conceptualisation of workplace bullying has evolved from being viewed as isolated interpersonal conflicts or manifestations of oppressed group behaviour to recognising it as a complex phenomenon influenced by organisational structures and power dynamics (Hutchinson and Jackson 2015). As conceptual understandings have developed, so too have understandings of the importance of examining systemic factors and institutional cultures that perpetuate bullying, moving beyond individualistic explanations to more comprehensive, critical perspectives (Hutchinson and Jackson 2015).

To be considered workplace bullying, behaviour does not refer to an isolated event. Bullying is characterised by repeated and persistent behaviours, such as incivility, social exclusion and verbal or emotional aggression, that takes place and continues over time and acts to create a hostile work environment (Arnetz et al. 2019). When considered individually, the acts may be considered trivial and minor, but when viewed in the context of duration and multiplicity of events, they are able to be recognised as a pattern of bullying. Bullying behaviours are designed to isolate, humiliate and punish a person, and over time a pattern of bullying can gradually undermine the confidence and well-being of the targeted individual, and this can result in the targeted person feeling isolated, vulnerable and powerless.

Arnetz et al. (2019, 1230) provided a concise and succinct definition: ‘Bullying is deliberate, persistent, negative actions (harassing, coercing, intimidating, dominating, oppressing, persecuting, tormenting) on the part of one person or a group of persons toward a particular individual’. While there is no universally agreed list of actions that constitute workplace bullying, it often includes behaviours such as yelling, speaking rudely, gossiping, belittling others, deliberately undermining someone's work or creating unnecessary stress and pressure (Hurley et al. 2016). These authors also describe more targeted and harmful actions like persistent surveillance, online shaming, attacks on a person's reputation or career opportunities and deliberate social exclusion. In some cases, formal systems, job responsibilities or organisational procedures are manipulated to cause harm, giving rise to forms of bullying that are deeply embedded within workplace power structures and institutional practices (Hurley et al. 2016).

People affected by bullying experience emotional and mental health consequences (Hurley et al. 2016; Fernández-Gutiérrez and Mosteiro-Díaz 2021). In a large Australian study of public sector employees, respondents described workplace bullying as having severe mental health consequences, with respondents reporting symptoms, such as anxiety, depression and suicidal thoughts (Hurley et al. 2016). Some respondents reported experiencing panic and distress when entering the workplace, while others required stress or sick leave to cope with the psychological impact of workplace bullying.

While attention is rightly given to the experiences of those who are bullied, it is also important to acknowledge that being accused of bullying, particularly when the claims are unfounded, can be equally traumatising, particularly where there is a sense that procedural fairness has not occurred (Jenkins et al. 2011). The ripple effects of bullying can extend past the individuals directly involved. Teams can become damaged and fractured, and even though people involved in such situations are asked to maintain confidentiality, gossip and speculation can proliferate. Leaders can also be caught in the crossfire, and sometimes they themselves may feel unsupported. Staff who witness conflict may withdraw emotionally, disengage or begin to mistrust both colleagues and organisational processes. Real distress can result, especially when people feel unable to intervene or feel that complaints are mismanaged or not taken seriously or that the complaints process is being misused.

Despite decades of anti-bullying policies, the problem of workplace bullying in nursing remains concerning. This is not necessarily because the policies are flawed; generally, they are likely well-intentioned. However, policy on its own cannot meaningfully change cultures. Workplace culture is both shaped and reflected in the day-to-day interactions and dealings between those within the culture, in what is tolerated or not tolerated, and in how power and voice are distributed, heard and move through the organisation.

In order to meaningfully reduce the incidence and impact of work-based conflict and the damage it causes, there is a need to move beyond simple policy compliance into workplace transformation. Achieving this will require strong and emotionally intelligent leadership at every level of an organisation. We cannot assume that all leaders have the skills to achieve meaningful change, and so leaders must be supported and trained in relational approaches to performance management, courageous conversations and trauma-informed conflict resolution.

Effective management of bullying complaints is essential as the workplace can be seriously damaged when complaints are mismanaged. It really is important that the people and the systems charged with responding to bullying allegations are fair, transparent and timely. It is crucial that those investigating bullying allegations adopt a neutral position and not make assumptions based on one unsubstantiated version of events. When triaging complaints, it is also crucial to distinguish between bullying and other forms of interpersonal conflict and be able to differentiate between spurious complaints and genuine bullying. All parties involved need to be provided with immediate support once allegations are made, not just the complainant, and not only after an investigation has concluded.

Nurse researchers have provided the profession with many insights into bullying, including how and why it occurs and ways to recognise and respond to bullying, as well as ways to eradicate it. If we are serious about improving the health and emotional safety of our profession, we need more than policies and zero-tolerance statements. We need to take the lessons from the literature and use them to guide us through a process of cultural transformation that is grounded in relational ethics, strong and principled leadership and cultures of respect.

There is a need to move beyond performative (and often ineffective) policies toward authentic, compassionate relationship-centred cultures of care. Real and meaningful change is not just about reducing complaints or improving retention statistics. Real change is about honouring the humanity of nurses, who do some of the most important and emotionally demanding work in healthcare.

Nurses deserve workplaces where respect, fairness, compassion and justice are not aspirational, but foundational. Creating kinder, more compassionate workplaces and investing in emotionally intelligent leadership, team-based conflict resolution, ensuring adequate resources and manageable workloads offers a path forward. It is time to stop normalising dysfunction and start cultivating workplaces where nurses can thrive, not just survive.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信