Theresa Wagner, Alma R. Herscovici, Amelie Fuchs, Sebastian Kabas, Mara Hilbert, Laura M. König, Matthias Unseld, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger
{"title":"迈向全面的结直肠癌筛检:智障成人的经验与需求","authors":"Theresa Wagner, Alma R. Herscovici, Amelie Fuchs, Sebastian Kabas, Mara Hilbert, Laura M. König, Matthias Unseld, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care, resulting in delayed cancer diagnosis and higher mortality rates. There is limited understanding of the factors that influence their participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly from their own perspectives. This study aimed to identify the barriers, facilitators, and needs of people with ID for an inclusive CRC screening programme from their own experiences and viewpoints.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups (<i>N</i> = 31) were conducted with adults with ID in Austria. Interviews and group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used as a flexible method to analyse the data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five themes were identified from the data with each consisting of two to four sub-themes: (1) independence within individually adjusted scopes of arrangement and decision-making, (2) ‘When it comes to health, I do it’, (3) enhancing wellbeing, (4) seeing the person first, then their ID, and (5) deficits in resources and the healthcare system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings reveal significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care for people with ID. The following practical implications were derived: Eliminating discrimination, improving accessibility, designing appropriate information and educational materials, implementing mandatory ID-specific training for health professionals, considering the importance of emotions and implementing ID-appropriate health services. Considering these aspects when developing inclusive cancer screening programmes is of paramount importance to promote equitable health and cancer prevention, especially for marginalised and vulnerable groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71212","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Inclusive Colorectal Cancer Screening: Experiences and Needs of Adults With Intellectual Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Theresa Wagner, Alma R. Herscovici, Amelie Fuchs, Sebastian Kabas, Mara Hilbert, Laura M. König, Matthias Unseld, Elisabeth L. Zeilinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care, resulting in delayed cancer diagnosis and higher mortality rates. There is limited understanding of the factors that influence their participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly from their own perspectives. This study aimed to identify the barriers, facilitators, and needs of people with ID for an inclusive CRC screening programme from their own experiences and viewpoints.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups (<i>N</i> = 31) were conducted with adults with ID in Austria. Interviews and group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used as a flexible method to analyse the data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five themes were identified from the data with each consisting of two to four sub-themes: (1) independence within individually adjusted scopes of arrangement and decision-making, (2) ‘When it comes to health, I do it’, (3) enhancing wellbeing, (4) seeing the person first, then their ID, and (5) deficits in resources and the healthcare system.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings reveal significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care for people with ID. The following practical implications were derived: Eliminating discrimination, improving accessibility, designing appropriate information and educational materials, implementing mandatory ID-specific training for health professionals, considering the importance of emotions and implementing ID-appropriate health services. Considering these aspects when developing inclusive cancer screening programmes is of paramount importance to promote equitable health and cancer prevention, especially for marginalised and vulnerable groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71212\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71212\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards Inclusive Colorectal Cancer Screening: Experiences and Needs of Adults With Intellectual Disabilities
Introduction
People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care, resulting in delayed cancer diagnosis and higher mortality rates. There is limited understanding of the factors that influence their participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, particularly from their own perspectives. This study aimed to identify the barriers, facilitators, and needs of people with ID for an inclusive CRC screening programme from their own experiences and viewpoints.
Methods
Semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups (N = 31) were conducted with adults with ID in Austria. Interviews and group discussions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used as a flexible method to analyse the data.
Results
Five themes were identified from the data with each consisting of two to four sub-themes: (1) independence within individually adjusted scopes of arrangement and decision-making, (2) ‘When it comes to health, I do it’, (3) enhancing wellbeing, (4) seeing the person first, then their ID, and (5) deficits in resources and the healthcare system.
Conclusion
The findings reveal significant barriers to healthcare and preventive cancer care for people with ID. The following practical implications were derived: Eliminating discrimination, improving accessibility, designing appropriate information and educational materials, implementing mandatory ID-specific training for health professionals, considering the importance of emotions and implementing ID-appropriate health services. Considering these aspects when developing inclusive cancer screening programmes is of paramount importance to promote equitable health and cancer prevention, especially for marginalised and vulnerable groups.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.