Carlos Felipe dos Santos Cordeiro, Leonardo Vesco Galdi, Gilmar Santos Martins Junior, Alexandrius de Moraes Barbosa, Fábio Rafael Echer
{"title":"不同种植方式和密度对辐射利用效率和花生产量的影响","authors":"Carlos Felipe dos Santos Cordeiro, Leonardo Vesco Galdi, Gilmar Santos Martins Junior, Alexandrius de Moraes Barbosa, Fábio Rafael Echer","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adjusting plant density and planting pattern are strategies to improve the production efficiency of Virginia-type peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.), but little is known about their effects on radiation use efficiency (RUE), pod maturity, and pod yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the yield components, pod maturity, and RUE of peanut based on planting patterns and plant density in areas with different cropping histories. Four experiments were conducted between 2021 and 2023 in the western state of São Paulo, Brazil. Treatments included planting patterns (single-row and twin-row) and plant densities (88,888; 111,110; 133,332; and 155,554 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>). The optimal plant density was between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>. In the drier growing season the reduction of each 1000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> in plant densities below 111,110 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> caused a pod yield decrease of 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the new field and 65 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the rotation field. In the wetter growing season, the increase of each 1000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> in the plant density above 111,110 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> caused a yield decrease of 41 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the rotation field. Although the twin-row pattern increased leaf area index (LAI), it did not result in higher RUE or peanut yield compared to the single-row pattern. Under the lowest plant density, there was a delay in pod maturation. Our results indicate that it is possible to achieve adequate LAI, RUE, and pod maturity with plant densities between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>, regardless of the planting pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation use efficiency and peanut yield as affected by planting pattern and plant density in different crop systems\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Felipe dos Santos Cordeiro, Leonardo Vesco Galdi, Gilmar Santos Martins Junior, Alexandrius de Moraes Barbosa, Fábio Rafael Echer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Adjusting plant density and planting pattern are strategies to improve the production efficiency of Virginia-type peanut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.), but little is known about their effects on radiation use efficiency (RUE), pod maturity, and pod yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the yield components, pod maturity, and RUE of peanut based on planting patterns and plant density in areas with different cropping histories. Four experiments were conducted between 2021 and 2023 in the western state of São Paulo, Brazil. Treatments included planting patterns (single-row and twin-row) and plant densities (88,888; 111,110; 133,332; and 155,554 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>). The optimal plant density was between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>. In the drier growing season the reduction of each 1000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> in plant densities below 111,110 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> caused a pod yield decrease of 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the new field and 65 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the rotation field. In the wetter growing season, the increase of each 1000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> in the plant density above 111,110 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> caused a yield decrease of 41 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the rotation field. Although the twin-row pattern increased leaf area index (LAI), it did not result in higher RUE or peanut yield compared to the single-row pattern. Under the lowest plant density, there was a delay in pod maturation. Our results indicate that it is possible to achieve adequate LAI, RUE, and pod maturity with plant densities between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>, regardless of the planting pattern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70152\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70152\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
调整种植密度和种植模式是提高弗吉尼亚型花生生产效率的策略,但对辐射利用效率(RUE)、荚果成熟度和荚果产量的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在评价不同种植历史地区花生在不同种植模式和密度下的产量构成、荚果成熟度和RUE。2021年至2023年间,在巴西西部的圣保罗州进行了四次实验。处理包括种植模式(单行和双行)和植物密度(88,888株、111,110株、133,332株和155,554株/ m2)。最适密度为111,110 ~ 133,332株ha - 1。在干旱生长季节,每1000株ha - 1密度低于111,110株ha - 1,新田和轮作田的荚果产量分别减少60 kg ha - 1和65 kg ha - 1。在湿润生长季节,每增加1000株ha - 1,在111,110株ha - 1以上,轮作田产量减少41 kg ha - 1。双行模式虽然增加了叶面积指数(LAI),但与单行模式相比,双行模式并没有导致更高的RUE和花生产量。在最低植株密度下,豆荚成熟延迟。我们的研究结果表明,无论种植模式如何,当植物密度在111,110 ~ 133,332株ha - 1之间时,都有可能获得足够的LAI、RUE和荚果成熟度。
Radiation use efficiency and peanut yield as affected by planting pattern and plant density in different crop systems
Adjusting plant density and planting pattern are strategies to improve the production efficiency of Virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), but little is known about their effects on radiation use efficiency (RUE), pod maturity, and pod yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the yield components, pod maturity, and RUE of peanut based on planting patterns and plant density in areas with different cropping histories. Four experiments were conducted between 2021 and 2023 in the western state of São Paulo, Brazil. Treatments included planting patterns (single-row and twin-row) and plant densities (88,888; 111,110; 133,332; and 155,554 plants ha−1). The optimal plant density was between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha−1. In the drier growing season the reduction of each 1000 plants ha−1 in plant densities below 111,110 plants ha−1 caused a pod yield decrease of 60 kg ha−1 in the new field and 65 kg ha−1 in the rotation field. In the wetter growing season, the increase of each 1000 plants ha−1 in the plant density above 111,110 plants ha−1 caused a yield decrease of 41 kg ha−1 in the rotation field. Although the twin-row pattern increased leaf area index (LAI), it did not result in higher RUE or peanut yield compared to the single-row pattern. Under the lowest plant density, there was a delay in pod maturation. Our results indicate that it is possible to achieve adequate LAI, RUE, and pod maturity with plant densities between 111,110 and 133,332 plants ha−1, regardless of the planting pattern.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.