Enchao Qiu, Joga Chaganti, Phillip Phan, Mahdi Alizadeh, Devon Middleton, Kiran Talekar, Prabath K. Mondel, Scott H. Faro, Feroze B. Mohamed, Hsiangkuo Yuan
{"title":"脑血管周围MR弥散张量成像测量的可靠性和空间一致性","authors":"Enchao Qiu, Joga Chaganti, Phillip Phan, Mahdi Alizadeh, Devon Middleton, Kiran Talekar, Prabath K. Mondel, Scott H. Faro, Feroze B. Mohamed, Hsiangkuo Yuan","doi":"10.1111/jon.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) has emerged as a promising noninvasive method for evaluating water motion that may reflect glymphatic system function. However, the reliability of DTI-ALPS measurements across different region-of-interest (ROI) selection methods remains underinvestigated. This study aimed to assess the interrater reliability among three neuroradiologists in native space and compare DTI-ALPS indices derived from ROIs placed in subjects’ native space versus standardized Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>DTI-ALPS indices from 16 healthy subjects were calculated from both left and right hemispheres using two ROI placement approaches: (1) native space ROIs manually placed by three neuroradiologists, and (2) standardized ROIs in MNI space based on the fractional anisotropy template. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The proportion of ROI overlaps among the three neuroradiologists was also evaluated. Differences between native and MNI space measurements were evaluated using related-samples Friedman's analysis with post hoc pairwise comparisons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Interrater reliability for native space ROI placement was moderate for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.599) and good for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.807). Spatial overlap analysis revealed poor Dice similarity coefficients across all ROI types (range: 0.047–0.312), with right association ROIs showing higher spatial consistency. Significant differences were found between native and MNI space measurements for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (<i>p</i> = 0.002) but not for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (<i>p</i> = 0.913).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the importance of standardized ROI selection approaches for clinical applications of DTI-ALPS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroimaging","volume":"35 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Spatial Consistency of MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures Along the Cerebral Perivascular Space\",\"authors\":\"Enchao Qiu, Joga Chaganti, Phillip Phan, Mahdi Alizadeh, Devon Middleton, Kiran Talekar, Prabath K. Mondel, Scott H. Faro, Feroze B. Mohamed, Hsiangkuo Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jon.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) has emerged as a promising noninvasive method for evaluating water motion that may reflect glymphatic system function. However, the reliability of DTI-ALPS measurements across different region-of-interest (ROI) selection methods remains underinvestigated. This study aimed to assess the interrater reliability among three neuroradiologists in native space and compare DTI-ALPS indices derived from ROIs placed in subjects’ native space versus standardized Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>DTI-ALPS indices from 16 healthy subjects were calculated from both left and right hemispheres using two ROI placement approaches: (1) native space ROIs manually placed by three neuroradiologists, and (2) standardized ROIs in MNI space based on the fractional anisotropy template. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The proportion of ROI overlaps among the three neuroradiologists was also evaluated. Differences between native and MNI space measurements were evaluated using related-samples Friedman's analysis with post hoc pairwise comparisons.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Interrater reliability for native space ROI placement was moderate for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.599) and good for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.807). Spatial overlap analysis revealed poor Dice similarity coefficients across all ROI types (range: 0.047–0.312), with right association ROIs showing higher spatial consistency. Significant differences were found between native and MNI space measurements for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (<i>p</i> = 0.002) but not for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (<i>p</i> = 0.913).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings highlight the importance of standardized ROI selection approaches for clinical applications of DTI-ALPS.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jon.70086\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.70086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jon.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and Spatial Consistency of MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures Along the Cerebral Perivascular Space
Background and Purpose
Diffusion tensor imaging analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) has emerged as a promising noninvasive method for evaluating water motion that may reflect glymphatic system function. However, the reliability of DTI-ALPS measurements across different region-of-interest (ROI) selection methods remains underinvestigated. This study aimed to assess the interrater reliability among three neuroradiologists in native space and compare DTI-ALPS indices derived from ROIs placed in subjects’ native space versus standardized Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space.
Methods
DTI-ALPS indices from 16 healthy subjects were calculated from both left and right hemispheres using two ROI placement approaches: (1) native space ROIs manually placed by three neuroradiologists, and (2) standardized ROIs in MNI space based on the fractional anisotropy template. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The proportion of ROI overlaps among the three neuroradiologists was also evaluated. Differences between native and MNI space measurements were evaluated using related-samples Friedman's analysis with post hoc pairwise comparisons.
Results
Interrater reliability for native space ROI placement was moderate for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.599) and good for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (ICC = 0.807). Spatial overlap analysis revealed poor Dice similarity coefficients across all ROI types (range: 0.047–0.312), with right association ROIs showing higher spatial consistency. Significant differences were found between native and MNI space measurements for left-sided DTI-ALPS indices (p = 0.002) but not for right-sided DTI-ALPS indices (p = 0.913).
Conclusion
These findings highlight the importance of standardized ROI selection approaches for clinical applications of DTI-ALPS.
期刊介绍:
Start reading the Journal of Neuroimaging to learn the latest neurological imaging techniques. The peer-reviewed research is written in a practical clinical context, giving you the information you need on:
MRI
CT
Carotid Ultrasound and TCD
SPECT
PET
Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology
Functional MRI
Xenon CT
and other new and upcoming neuroscientific modalities.The Journal of Neuroimaging addresses the full spectrum of human nervous system disease, including stroke, neoplasia, degenerating and demyelinating disease, epilepsy, tumors, lesions, infectious disease, cerebral vascular arterial diseases, toxic-metabolic disease, psychoses, dementias, heredo-familial disease, and trauma.Offering original research, review articles, case reports, neuroimaging CPCs, and evaluations of instruments and technology relevant to the nervous system, the Journal of Neuroimaging focuses on useful clinical developments and applications, tested techniques and interpretations, patient care, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Start reading today!