基于多个全球气候模式评估未来干旱的新统计框架:加权多模态自适应标准化降水指数

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Rabiya Fatima, Zulfiqar Ali
{"title":"基于多个全球气候模式评估未来干旱的新统计框架:加权多模态自适应标准化降水指数","authors":"Rabiya Fatima,&nbsp;Zulfiqar Ali","doi":"10.1007/s00024-025-03768-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drought is one of the major consequences of global warming. Being a complex natural hazard, its accurate assessment is challenging. Simulated data of varying climate parameters from Global Climate Models (GCMs) is a crucial source for assessing the future characteristics of climate change. The objective of this article is to improve future drought assessment based on ensemble of multiple GCMs. Consequently, this study proposes a new statistical framework to improve future drought assessment based on a multiple GCM ensemble. The proposed framework introduces a new weighting scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (MMEs), called the Precipitation Concentration Index-Based Weighting Scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (PCIWS-MME), and a drought index known as the Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index (WMASPI). The application of the proposed research is based on 22 GCMs from the Phase 6 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and covers 103 grid points in Pakistan. To assess the effectiveness of PCIWS-MME, we compared its performance with the Simple Multimodel Mean (MME) and Mutual Information (MI) using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Average Error (MAE). Furthermore, we evaluated the quality of WMASPI by fitting the most appropriate models, whether univariate, mixture-based, or derived from nonparametric probability plotting position formulas. The results of probabilistic modeling indicate that mixture probability models are more appropriate than univariate alternatives. For example, on the 3-month time scale under Scenario 1, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for the best-fitting univariate distribution is <span>\\(-\\)</span>708.11, while the K-CGMM model achieves a substantially lower BIC of -7001, reflecting a significantly better fit. Similarly, at the 24-month time scale under Scenario 3, the univariate model yields a BIC of <span>\\(-\\)</span>301.52, whereas the K-CGMM model attains a much lower BIC of <span>\\(-\\)</span>980.68, further confirming its superior performance. The results associated with the weighting schemes indicate that PCIWS-MME outperformed both the simple mean-based MME and MI-based schemes, since it consistently exhibited lower RMSE and MAE while demonstrating a higher correlation with the observed data. Furthermore, the study used the proposed multimodel ensemble data from PCIWS-MME to calculate standardized drought indices under WMASPI. To assess long-term drought trends, results obtained by trend analysis using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test indicate that, in the short term (3–12 time scales), trends are generally weak and statistically insignificant, except for SSP1<span>\\(-\\)</span>2.6, which exhibits a slight but significant decreasing trend at certain intervals. In the medium term (24-time scale), all scenarios show decreasing trends, with SSP5<span>\\(-\\)</span>8.5 displaying the most pronounced decline. Over the long term (48-time scale), all three scenarios demonstrate statistically significant negative trends. In summary, the study demonstrates the use of advanced statistical tools to model and assess drought under global climate change using simulated precipitation data from GCM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"182 8","pages":"3285 - 3309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Statistical Framework for Assessing Future Drought Using Multiple Global Climate Model: The Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index\",\"authors\":\"Rabiya Fatima,&nbsp;Zulfiqar Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00024-025-03768-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Drought is one of the major consequences of global warming. Being a complex natural hazard, its accurate assessment is challenging. Simulated data of varying climate parameters from Global Climate Models (GCMs) is a crucial source for assessing the future characteristics of climate change. The objective of this article is to improve future drought assessment based on ensemble of multiple GCMs. Consequently, this study proposes a new statistical framework to improve future drought assessment based on a multiple GCM ensemble. The proposed framework introduces a new weighting scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (MMEs), called the Precipitation Concentration Index-Based Weighting Scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (PCIWS-MME), and a drought index known as the Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index (WMASPI). The application of the proposed research is based on 22 GCMs from the Phase 6 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and covers 103 grid points in Pakistan. To assess the effectiveness of PCIWS-MME, we compared its performance with the Simple Multimodel Mean (MME) and Mutual Information (MI) using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Average Error (MAE). Furthermore, we evaluated the quality of WMASPI by fitting the most appropriate models, whether univariate, mixture-based, or derived from nonparametric probability plotting position formulas. The results of probabilistic modeling indicate that mixture probability models are more appropriate than univariate alternatives. For example, on the 3-month time scale under Scenario 1, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for the best-fitting univariate distribution is <span>\\\\(-\\\\)</span>708.11, while the K-CGMM model achieves a substantially lower BIC of -7001, reflecting a significantly better fit. Similarly, at the 24-month time scale under Scenario 3, the univariate model yields a BIC of <span>\\\\(-\\\\)</span>301.52, whereas the K-CGMM model attains a much lower BIC of <span>\\\\(-\\\\)</span>980.68, further confirming its superior performance. The results associated with the weighting schemes indicate that PCIWS-MME outperformed both the simple mean-based MME and MI-based schemes, since it consistently exhibited lower RMSE and MAE while demonstrating a higher correlation with the observed data. Furthermore, the study used the proposed multimodel ensemble data from PCIWS-MME to calculate standardized drought indices under WMASPI. To assess long-term drought trends, results obtained by trend analysis using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test indicate that, in the short term (3–12 time scales), trends are generally weak and statistically insignificant, except for SSP1<span>\\\\(-\\\\)</span>2.6, which exhibits a slight but significant decreasing trend at certain intervals. In the medium term (24-time scale), all scenarios show decreasing trends, with SSP5<span>\\\\(-\\\\)</span>8.5 displaying the most pronounced decline. Over the long term (48-time scale), all three scenarios demonstrate statistically significant negative trends. In summary, the study demonstrates the use of advanced statistical tools to model and assess drought under global climate change using simulated precipitation data from GCM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"volume\":\"182 8\",\"pages\":\"3285 - 3309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03768-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03768-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干旱是全球变暖的主要后果之一。作为一种复杂的自然灾害,其准确评估具有挑战性。来自全球气候模式(GCMs)的不同气候参数的模拟数据是评估未来气候变化特征的重要来源。本文的目的是改进基于多重gcm集合的未来干旱评估。因此,本研究提出了一个新的统计框架,以改进基于多重GCM集合的未来干旱评估。该框架引入了基于降水浓度指数的多模式组合加权方案(PCIWS-MME)和加权多模式自适应标准化降水指数(WMASPI)的干旱指数。拟议研究的应用基于来自第6阶段耦合模式比对项目(CMIP6)的22个gcm,覆盖了巴基斯坦的103个网格点。为了评估PCIWS-MME的有效性,我们使用均方根误差(RMSE)和平均误差(MAE)将其性能与简单多模型均值(MME)和互信息(MI)进行了比较。此外,我们通过拟合最合适的模型来评估WMASPI的质量,无论是单变量的,基于混合的,还是来自非参数概率绘图位置公式的。概率建模结果表明,混合概率模型比单变量模型更合适。例如,在情景1的3个月时间尺度上,最佳拟合单变量分布的贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)为\(-\) 708.11,而K-CGMM模型的BIC为-7001,明显较好地反映了拟合。同样,在情景3的24个月时间尺度下,单变量模型的BIC为\(-\) 301.52,而K-CGMM模型的BIC为\(-\) 9800.68,进一步证实了其优异的性能。与加权方案相关的结果表明,PCIWS-MME方案优于简单的基于平均值的MME方案和基于mi的方案,因为它始终显示出较低的RMSE和MAE,同时与观测数据显示出较高的相关性。在此基础上,利用PCIWS-MME多模式集合数据计算WMASPI下的标准化干旱指数。利用Mann-Kendall (MK)检验的趋势分析结果表明,在短期内(3-12个时间尺度),除SSP1 \(-\) 2.6在一定时间间隔内呈现轻微但显著的下降趋势外,趋势普遍较弱,统计学意义不显著。在中期(24时间尺度),所有情景均呈现下降趋势,其中SSP5 \(-\) 8.5下降最为明显。从长期来看(48个时间尺度),所有三种情景都显示出统计上显著的负面趋势。总而言之,本研究展示了利用先进的统计工具,利用GCM的模拟降水数据来模拟和评估全球气候变化下的干旱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Novel Statistical Framework for Assessing Future Drought Using Multiple Global Climate Model: The Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index

A Novel Statistical Framework for Assessing Future Drought Using Multiple Global Climate Model: The Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index

A Novel Statistical Framework for Assessing Future Drought Using Multiple Global Climate Model: The Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index

Drought is one of the major consequences of global warming. Being a complex natural hazard, its accurate assessment is challenging. Simulated data of varying climate parameters from Global Climate Models (GCMs) is a crucial source for assessing the future characteristics of climate change. The objective of this article is to improve future drought assessment based on ensemble of multiple GCMs. Consequently, this study proposes a new statistical framework to improve future drought assessment based on a multiple GCM ensemble. The proposed framework introduces a new weighting scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (MMEs), called the Precipitation Concentration Index-Based Weighting Scheme for Multi-Model Ensembles (PCIWS-MME), and a drought index known as the Weighted Multimodal Adaptive Standardized Precipitation Index (WMASPI). The application of the proposed research is based on 22 GCMs from the Phase 6 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and covers 103 grid points in Pakistan. To assess the effectiveness of PCIWS-MME, we compared its performance with the Simple Multimodel Mean (MME) and Mutual Information (MI) using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Average Error (MAE). Furthermore, we evaluated the quality of WMASPI by fitting the most appropriate models, whether univariate, mixture-based, or derived from nonparametric probability plotting position formulas. The results of probabilistic modeling indicate that mixture probability models are more appropriate than univariate alternatives. For example, on the 3-month time scale under Scenario 1, the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) for the best-fitting univariate distribution is \(-\)708.11, while the K-CGMM model achieves a substantially lower BIC of -7001, reflecting a significantly better fit. Similarly, at the 24-month time scale under Scenario 3, the univariate model yields a BIC of \(-\)301.52, whereas the K-CGMM model attains a much lower BIC of \(-\)980.68, further confirming its superior performance. The results associated with the weighting schemes indicate that PCIWS-MME outperformed both the simple mean-based MME and MI-based schemes, since it consistently exhibited lower RMSE and MAE while demonstrating a higher correlation with the observed data. Furthermore, the study used the proposed multimodel ensemble data from PCIWS-MME to calculate standardized drought indices under WMASPI. To assess long-term drought trends, results obtained by trend analysis using the Mann-Kendall (MK) test indicate that, in the short term (3–12 time scales), trends are generally weak and statistically insignificant, except for SSP1\(-\)2.6, which exhibits a slight but significant decreasing trend at certain intervals. In the medium term (24-time scale), all scenarios show decreasing trends, with SSP5\(-\)8.5 displaying the most pronounced decline. Over the long term (48-time scale), all three scenarios demonstrate statistically significant negative trends. In summary, the study demonstrates the use of advanced statistical tools to model and assess drought under global climate change using simulated precipitation data from GCM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信