Oguz Simsek, Hatice Citakoglu, Veysel Gumus, Selmin Dere Çetin
{"title":"应用机器学习了解土耳其底格里斯河流域降雨-径流相互作用","authors":"Oguz Simsek, Hatice Citakoglu, Veysel Gumus, Selmin Dere Çetin","doi":"10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The modeling of rainfall (<i>P</i><sub>i</sub>) and runoff (<i>Q</i><sub>i</sub>) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters <i>P</i><sub>i</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−1</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−2</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−3</sub>, and <i>Q</i><sub>i−1</sub> to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"182 8","pages":"3107 - 3138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Machine Learning to Understand Rainfall–Runoff Interactions in the Tigris River Basin of Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Oguz Simsek, Hatice Citakoglu, Veysel Gumus, Selmin Dere Çetin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The modeling of rainfall (<i>P</i><sub>i</sub>) and runoff (<i>Q</i><sub>i</sub>) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters <i>P</i><sub>i</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−1</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−2</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−3</sub>, and <i>Q</i><sub>i−1</sub> to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"volume\":\"182 8\",\"pages\":\"3107 - 3138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Applying Machine Learning to Understand Rainfall–Runoff Interactions in the Tigris River Basin of Turkey
The modeling of rainfall (Pi) and runoff (Qi) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters Pi, Pi−1, Pi−2, Pi−3, and Qi−1 to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, R2, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.
期刊介绍:
pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys.
Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata
Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences
Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research
Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences
See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.