应用机器学习了解土耳其底格里斯河流域降雨-径流相互作用

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Oguz Simsek, Hatice Citakoglu, Veysel Gumus, Selmin Dere Çetin
{"title":"应用机器学习了解土耳其底格里斯河流域降雨-径流相互作用","authors":"Oguz Simsek,&nbsp;Hatice Citakoglu,&nbsp;Veysel Gumus,&nbsp;Selmin Dere Çetin","doi":"10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The modeling of rainfall (<i>P</i><sub>i</sub>) and runoff (<i>Q</i><sub>i</sub>) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters <i>P</i><sub>i</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−1</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−2</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−3</sub>, and <i>Q</i><sub>i−1</sub> to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"182 8","pages":"3107 - 3138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying Machine Learning to Understand Rainfall–Runoff Interactions in the Tigris River Basin of Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Oguz Simsek,&nbsp;Hatice Citakoglu,&nbsp;Veysel Gumus,&nbsp;Selmin Dere Çetin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The modeling of rainfall (<i>P</i><sub>i</sub>) and runoff (<i>Q</i><sub>i</sub>) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters <i>P</i><sub>i</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−1</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−2</sub>, <i>P</i><sub>i−3</sub>, and <i>Q</i><sub>i−1</sub> to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"volume\":\"182 8\",\"pages\":\"3107 - 3138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"pure and applied geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-025-03749-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降雨(Pi)和径流(Qi)的建模是当前水文学领域面临的一个重大挑战。在这方面可以采用许多方法,从概念方法到完全由数据驱动和基于物理的方法。提出了一种利用自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)、长短期记忆(LSTM)算法、支持向量机(SVM)算法和高斯过程回归(GPR)算法对底格里斯河流域9个气象站降水进行估计的方法。该方法基于流域内7个气象观测站的降雨数据。泰森多边形被用来将降雨和径流站联系起来。在研究区,采用Pi、Pi−1、Pi−2、Pi−3和Qi−1 4个输入参数构建了11个模型,以确定降雨-径流关系。采用平均绝对误差(MAE)、均方根误差(RMSE)、决定系数(R2)、Nash-Sutcliffe效率系数(NSE)、Kling-Gupta效率(KGE)和百分比偏差(PBIAS)标准评价估计方法的有效性。研究结果表明,与其他模型相比,LSTM方法在所有情况下都表现出优越的性能。在LSTM方法中,所有模型(从模型1到模型11)的平均MAE、RMSE、R2、NSE和PBIAS标准对于训练和测试分别为7.14、9.99、0.97、0.96和7.38,对于测试分别为6.46、9.06、0.96、0.91和- 2.59。方差分析(ANOVA)检验结果表明,除模型9、10和11采用ANFIS方法外,其他方法均有效。此外,LSTM模型的卓越预测性能在结果的图形表示中得到了清晰的说明,如小提琴图和泰勒图所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applying Machine Learning to Understand Rainfall–Runoff Interactions in the Tigris River Basin of Turkey

The modeling of rainfall (Pi) and runoff (Qi) represents a significant challenge currently facing the field of hydrology. Numerous methodologies can be employed in this regard, spanning the spectrum from conceptual approaches to those that are entirely data-driven and physically based. This paper presents a method for estimating rainfall values at nine observation stations in the Tigris River Basin using four machine learning algorithms: the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm, the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm, and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm. The methodology is founded upon rainfall data obtained from seven meteorological observation stations within the basin. Thiessen polygons were employed to associate rainfall and runoff stations. In the study region, 11 models were constructed using the input parameters Pi, Pi−1, Pi−2, Pi−3, and Qi−1 to ascertain the rainfall–runoff relationship. The efficacy of the estimation methods was evaluated using the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), determination coefficient (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and percent bias (PBIAS) criteria. The study’s findings indicated that the LSTM method demonstrated superior performance compared to the other models in all cases. In the LSTM method, the average MAE, RMSE, R2, NSE, and PBIAS criteria for all models (from Model 1 to Model 11) were obtained as 7.14, 9.99, 0.97, 0.96, and 7.38 for training and 6.46, 9.06, 0.96, 0.91, and −2.59 for testing, respectively. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) test results indicated the efficacy of the methods, except for Models 9, 10, and 11, which employed the ANFIS method. Moreover, the exceptional predictive performance of the LSTM model is clearly illustrated in the graphical representation of the results, as demonstrated in violin plots and Taylor diagrams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信