用单细胞凝胶电泳(comet)法体外评价丙烯酰胺和5-羟甲基糠醛可能的遗传毒性作用

IF 3.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Can Babacanoğlu, Tuğbagül Çal Doğan, Sevtap Aydın Dilsiz, Mahmut Bucurgat, Ülkü Ündeğer Bucurgat
{"title":"用单细胞凝胶电泳(comet)法体外评价丙烯酰胺和5-羟甲基糠醛可能的遗传毒性作用","authors":"Can Babacanoğlu,&nbsp;Tuğbagül Çal Doğan,&nbsp;Sevtap Aydın Dilsiz,&nbsp;Mahmut Bucurgat,&nbsp;Ülkü Ündeğer Bucurgat","doi":"10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food cooking processes containing carbohydrates forms acrylamide (AA) and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) through Maillard reaction. These two substances are known as carcinogenic. Coffee consumption is a major exposure route of AA and HMF. Caffeic acid (CA) is an antioxidant naturally found in coffee. Our study aimed to evaluate the possible oxidative DNA damage induced by AA and HMF in CA-treated or CA-untreated Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells (V79 cells) and human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2 cells). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) technique. The cells were treated with different concentrations of AA, HMF (1–100 μM) and CA (25 and 50 μM) and different combinations of AA, HMF and CA with each other for 1 h. DNA damage was expressed as DNA tail intensity. In V79 cells, the doses of AA (1–50 μM) and HMF (1–100 μM) did not increase DNA damage alone. DNA damage was increased at the doses of 100 μM AA, 25 μM HMF, 25 and 50 μM CA and the genotoxic effects of AA were decreased when combined with 25 and 50 μM CA in V79 cells. In HepG2 cells, only 5 μM and 10 μM HMF increased DNA damage, but most of dose combinations of AA and HMF with CA caused more DNA damage in HepG2 cells than V79 cells. Our results show that AA and HMF alone may not cause considerable DNA damage, however CA might induce DNA damage at high doses in V79 cells.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":549,"journal":{"name":"European Food Research and Technology","volume":"251 9","pages":"2779 - 2791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro evaluation of the possible genotoxic effects of acrylamide and 5-hydroxymetylfurfural by single cell gel electroporesis (comet) assay\",\"authors\":\"Can Babacanoğlu,&nbsp;Tuğbagül Çal Doğan,&nbsp;Sevtap Aydın Dilsiz,&nbsp;Mahmut Bucurgat,&nbsp;Ülkü Ündeğer Bucurgat\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Food cooking processes containing carbohydrates forms acrylamide (AA) and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) through Maillard reaction. These two substances are known as carcinogenic. Coffee consumption is a major exposure route of AA and HMF. Caffeic acid (CA) is an antioxidant naturally found in coffee. Our study aimed to evaluate the possible oxidative DNA damage induced by AA and HMF in CA-treated or CA-untreated Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells (V79 cells) and human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2 cells). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) technique. The cells were treated with different concentrations of AA, HMF (1–100 μM) and CA (25 and 50 μM) and different combinations of AA, HMF and CA with each other for 1 h. DNA damage was expressed as DNA tail intensity. In V79 cells, the doses of AA (1–50 μM) and HMF (1–100 μM) did not increase DNA damage alone. DNA damage was increased at the doses of 100 μM AA, 25 μM HMF, 25 and 50 μM CA and the genotoxic effects of AA were decreased when combined with 25 and 50 μM CA in V79 cells. In HepG2 cells, only 5 μM and 10 μM HMF increased DNA damage, but most of dose combinations of AA and HMF with CA caused more DNA damage in HepG2 cells than V79 cells. Our results show that AA and HMF alone may not cause considerable DNA damage, however CA might induce DNA damage at high doses in V79 cells.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"251 9\",\"pages\":\"2779 - 2791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Food Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Food Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00217-025-04793-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

含有碳水化合物的食品在烹调过程中通过美拉德反应形成丙烯酰胺(AA)和5-羟甲基糠醛(HMF)。这两种物质被认为是致癌物质。咖啡是AA和HMF的主要暴露途径。咖啡酸(CA)是一种天然存在于咖啡中的抗氧化剂。本研究旨在探讨AA和HMF对ca处理或未处理的中国仓鼠肺成纤维细胞(V79细胞)和人肝癌细胞系(HepG2细胞)可能造成的DNA氧化损伤。采用单细胞凝胶电泳(comet)技术评价遗传毒性。不同浓度的AA、HMF (1 ~ 100 μM)和CA(25、50 μM)以及AA、HMF和CA的不同组合作用细胞1 h, DNA损伤以DNA尾部强度表示。在V79细胞中,AA (1 ~ 50 μM)和HMF (1 ~ 100 μM)剂量均不增加DNA损伤。100 μM AA、25 μM HMF、25和50 μM CA对V79细胞的DNA损伤均有增加作用,AA与25和50 μM CA联合对V79细胞的遗传毒性均有降低作用。在HepG2细胞中,只有5 μM和10 μM HMF增加了DNA损伤,但大多数AA和HMF与CA的剂量组合对HepG2细胞的DNA损伤大于V79细胞。我们的研究结果表明,单独使用AA和HMF可能不会造成相当大的DNA损伤,而CA可能在高剂量下诱导V79细胞的DNA损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro evaluation of the possible genotoxic effects of acrylamide and 5-hydroxymetylfurfural by single cell gel electroporesis (comet) assay

Food cooking processes containing carbohydrates forms acrylamide (AA) and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) through Maillard reaction. These two substances are known as carcinogenic. Coffee consumption is a major exposure route of AA and HMF. Caffeic acid (CA) is an antioxidant naturally found in coffee. Our study aimed to evaluate the possible oxidative DNA damage induced by AA and HMF in CA-treated or CA-untreated Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells (V79 cells) and human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (HepG2 cells). Genotoxicity was evaluated by the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) technique. The cells were treated with different concentrations of AA, HMF (1–100 μM) and CA (25 and 50 μM) and different combinations of AA, HMF and CA with each other for 1 h. DNA damage was expressed as DNA tail intensity. In V79 cells, the doses of AA (1–50 μM) and HMF (1–100 μM) did not increase DNA damage alone. DNA damage was increased at the doses of 100 μM AA, 25 μM HMF, 25 and 50 μM CA and the genotoxic effects of AA were decreased when combined with 25 and 50 μM CA in V79 cells. In HepG2 cells, only 5 μM and 10 μM HMF increased DNA damage, but most of dose combinations of AA and HMF with CA caused more DNA damage in HepG2 cells than V79 cells. Our results show that AA and HMF alone may not cause considerable DNA damage, however CA might induce DNA damage at high doses in V79 cells.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Food Research and Technology
European Food Research and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal European Food Research and Technology publishes state-of-the-art research papers and review articles on fundamental and applied food research. The journal''s mission is the fast publication of high quality papers on front-line research, newest techniques and on developing trends in the following sections: -chemistry and biochemistry- technology and molecular biotechnology- nutritional chemistry and toxicology- analytical and sensory methodologies- food physics. Out of the scope of the journal are: - contributions which are not of international interest or do not have a substantial impact on food sciences, - submissions which comprise merely data collections, based on the use of routine analytical or bacteriological methods, - contributions reporting biological or functional effects without profound chemical and/or physical structure characterization of the compound(s) under research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信