干旱区社会生态系统脆弱性评价:熵权聚集的交叉效率改进DEA模型

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lingxiao Sun , Yang Yu , Jing He , Chunlan Li , Xiang Yu , Lingyun Zhang , Yuanbo Lu , Ireneusz Malik , Malgorzata Wistuba
{"title":"干旱区社会生态系统脆弱性评价:熵权聚集的交叉效率改进DEA模型","authors":"Lingxiao Sun ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Jing He ,&nbsp;Chunlan Li ,&nbsp;Xiang Yu ,&nbsp;Lingyun Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanbo Lu ,&nbsp;Ireneusz Malik ,&nbsp;Malgorzata Wistuba","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arid social-ecological systems (SES) face escalating vulnerability from climate change and anthropogenic pressures, thus necessitating robust assessment frameworks for targeted governance. To address this need, this study extracted a typical hyper-arid area of the Tarim Basin, the Hotan Prefecture, as the research area and developed an integrated methodology combining an enhanced Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model and a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) indicator framework. Specifically, the DEA model was modified through cross-efficiency evaluation and entropy weight aggregation, thereby resolving traditional DEA ranking paradoxes while enabling objective, data-driven assessments. Crucially, the results revealed profound spatial-structural imbalances within the SES, as the social system (SS) exhibited significantly higher vulnerability than the ecological system (ES), contributing 68.6% of total variance. Furthermore, spatiotemporal analysis (2005–2023) indicated fluctuating but marginally declining regional vulnerability, albeit with heightened instability in the east. Regarding key drivers, pressures propelling SS vulnerability included low income, unemployment, and population crowding. ES pressures stemmed primarily from industrial emissions, inadequate wastewater treatment, and fertilizer overuse, with concentrations in northern industrial/agricultural belts. Significant SS deficiencies involved urbanization lag and income deficits, whereas agricultural resilience was observed. For ES, deficiencies centered on severe vegetation cover shortages in northern deserts, where afforestation was constrained by low precipitation and soil organic matter. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the dominance of socioeconomic drivers in arid SES vulnerability and underscore the necessity for spatially targeted governance. Key priorities therefore include: livelihood diversification, equitable economic development, ecological restoration in fragile northern corridors, and enhanced institutional capacity. Finally, future research should advance dynamic simulation, multi-scale integration, and policy coordination to effectively bridge vulnerability diagnosis with comprehensive governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114149"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulnerability assessment of Social-Ecological systems in arid Regions: A Cross-Efficiency modified DEA model with entropy weight aggregation\",\"authors\":\"Lingxiao Sun ,&nbsp;Yang Yu ,&nbsp;Jing He ,&nbsp;Chunlan Li ,&nbsp;Xiang Yu ,&nbsp;Lingyun Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanbo Lu ,&nbsp;Ireneusz Malik ,&nbsp;Malgorzata Wistuba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Arid social-ecological systems (SES) face escalating vulnerability from climate change and anthropogenic pressures, thus necessitating robust assessment frameworks for targeted governance. To address this need, this study extracted a typical hyper-arid area of the Tarim Basin, the Hotan Prefecture, as the research area and developed an integrated methodology combining an enhanced Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model and a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) indicator framework. Specifically, the DEA model was modified through cross-efficiency evaluation and entropy weight aggregation, thereby resolving traditional DEA ranking paradoxes while enabling objective, data-driven assessments. Crucially, the results revealed profound spatial-structural imbalances within the SES, as the social system (SS) exhibited significantly higher vulnerability than the ecological system (ES), contributing 68.6% of total variance. Furthermore, spatiotemporal analysis (2005–2023) indicated fluctuating but marginally declining regional vulnerability, albeit with heightened instability in the east. Regarding key drivers, pressures propelling SS vulnerability included low income, unemployment, and population crowding. ES pressures stemmed primarily from industrial emissions, inadequate wastewater treatment, and fertilizer overuse, with concentrations in northern industrial/agricultural belts. Significant SS deficiencies involved urbanization lag and income deficits, whereas agricultural resilience was observed. For ES, deficiencies centered on severe vegetation cover shortages in northern deserts, where afforestation was constrained by low precipitation and soil organic matter. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the dominance of socioeconomic drivers in arid SES vulnerability and underscore the necessity for spatially targeted governance. Key priorities therefore include: livelihood diversification, equitable economic development, ecological restoration in fragile northern corridors, and enhanced institutional capacity. Finally, future research should advance dynamic simulation, multi-scale integration, and policy coordination to effectively bridge vulnerability diagnosis with comprehensive governance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010817\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干旱的社会生态系统(SES)面临着日益加剧的气候变化和人为压力的脆弱性,因此需要强有力的评估框架来进行有针对性的治理。针对这一需求,本研究以塔里木盆地和田地区典型的极度干旱区为研究区,开发了一种结合增强型数据包络分析(DEA)模型和压力-状态-响应(PSR)指标框架的综合方法。具体而言,通过交叉效率评价和熵权聚合对DEA模型进行了修正,从而解决了传统DEA排名悖论,同时实现了客观的、数据驱动的评估。重要的是,结果揭示了社会经济系统内部深刻的空间结构失衡,社会系统(SS)表现出显著高于生态系统(ES)的脆弱性,贡献了总方差的68.6%。此外,时空分析(2005-2023年)表明,区域脆弱性波动但略有下降,尽管东部地区的不稳定性加剧。就主要驱动因素而言,推动SS脆弱性的压力包括低收入、失业和人口拥挤。ES压力主要来自工业排放、废水处理不足和化肥过度使用,集中在北部工农业带。显著的SS缺陷涉及城市化滞后和收入赤字,而农业弹性被观察到。对ES来说,缺陷集中在北部沙漠严重的植被覆盖短缺,那里的造林受到低降水和土壤有机质的限制。总的来说,这些发现表明社会经济驱动因素在干旱的SES脆弱性中占主导地位,并强调了有针对性的空间治理的必要性。因此,主要优先事项包括:生计多样化、公平的经济发展、脆弱的北部走廊的生态恢复以及加强机构能力。最后,未来研究应推进动态模拟、多尺度整合和政策协调,有效衔接脆弱性诊断与综合治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vulnerability assessment of Social-Ecological systems in arid Regions: A Cross-Efficiency modified DEA model with entropy weight aggregation
Arid social-ecological systems (SES) face escalating vulnerability from climate change and anthropogenic pressures, thus necessitating robust assessment frameworks for targeted governance. To address this need, this study extracted a typical hyper-arid area of the Tarim Basin, the Hotan Prefecture, as the research area and developed an integrated methodology combining an enhanced Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model and a Pressure-State-Response (PSR) indicator framework. Specifically, the DEA model was modified through cross-efficiency evaluation and entropy weight aggregation, thereby resolving traditional DEA ranking paradoxes while enabling objective, data-driven assessments. Crucially, the results revealed profound spatial-structural imbalances within the SES, as the social system (SS) exhibited significantly higher vulnerability than the ecological system (ES), contributing 68.6% of total variance. Furthermore, spatiotemporal analysis (2005–2023) indicated fluctuating but marginally declining regional vulnerability, albeit with heightened instability in the east. Regarding key drivers, pressures propelling SS vulnerability included low income, unemployment, and population crowding. ES pressures stemmed primarily from industrial emissions, inadequate wastewater treatment, and fertilizer overuse, with concentrations in northern industrial/agricultural belts. Significant SS deficiencies involved urbanization lag and income deficits, whereas agricultural resilience was observed. For ES, deficiencies centered on severe vegetation cover shortages in northern deserts, where afforestation was constrained by low precipitation and soil organic matter. Collectively, these findings demonstrate the dominance of socioeconomic drivers in arid SES vulnerability and underscore the necessity for spatially targeted governance. Key priorities therefore include: livelihood diversification, equitable economic development, ecological restoration in fragile northern corridors, and enhanced institutional capacity. Finally, future research should advance dynamic simulation, multi-scale integration, and policy coordination to effectively bridge vulnerability diagnosis with comprehensive governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信