Alessandro F. Gualtieri , Serena Mirata , Mario Passalacqua , Anna Maria Bassi , Sonia Scarfì
{"title":"有害矿物纤维的体外检测:浓度测定法的问题","authors":"Alessandro F. Gualtieri , Serena Mirata , Mario Passalacqua , Anna Maria Bassi , Sonia Scarfì","doi":"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the <em>in vitro</em> testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm<sup>3</sup> by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, <em>in vitro</em> tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11775,"journal":{"name":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro testing of hazardous mineral fibres: The issue of the concentration metric\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro F. Gualtieri , Serena Mirata , Mario Passalacqua , Anna Maria Bassi , Sonia Scarfì\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the <em>in vitro</em> testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm<sup>3</sup> by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, <em>in vitro</em> tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
In vitro testing of hazardous mineral fibres: The issue of the concentration metric
This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the in vitro testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm3 by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, in vitro tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes the results of studies concerning toxic and pharmacological effects of (human and veterinary) drugs and of environmental contaminants in animals and man.
Areas of special interest are: molecular mechanisms of toxicity, biotransformation and toxicokinetics (including toxicokinetic modelling), molecular, biochemical and physiological mechanisms explaining differences in sensitivity between species and individuals, the characterisation of pathophysiological models and mechanisms involved in the development of effects and the identification of biological markers that can be used to study exposure and effects in man and animals.
In addition to full length papers, short communications, full-length reviews and mini-reviews, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology will publish in depth assessments of special problem areas. The latter publications may exceed the length of a full length paper three to fourfold. A basic requirement is that the assessments are made under the auspices of international groups of leading experts in the fields concerned. The information examined may either consist of data that were already published, or of new data that were obtained within the framework of collaborative research programmes. Provision is also made for the acceptance of minireviews on (classes of) compounds, toxicities or mechanisms, debating recent advances in rapidly developing fields that fall within the scope of the journal.