有害矿物纤维的体外检测:浓度测定法的问题

IF 4.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alessandro F. Gualtieri , Serena Mirata , Mario Passalacqua , Anna Maria Bassi , Sonia Scarfì
{"title":"有害矿物纤维的体外检测:浓度测定法的问题","authors":"Alessandro F. Gualtieri ,&nbsp;Serena Mirata ,&nbsp;Mario Passalacqua ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Bassi ,&nbsp;Sonia Scarfì","doi":"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the <em>in vitro</em> testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm<sup>3</sup> by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, <em>in vitro</em> tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11775,"journal":{"name":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro testing of hazardous mineral fibres: The issue of the concentration metric\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro F. Gualtieri ,&nbsp;Serena Mirata ,&nbsp;Mario Passalacqua ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Bassi ,&nbsp;Sonia Scarfì\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.etap.2025.104813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the <em>in vitro</em> testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm<sup>3</sup> by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, <em>in vitro</em> tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001887\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental toxicology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1382668925001887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本通讯涉及矿物纤维体外测试的适当浓度量度问题,这是一个影响正确确定其毒性/致癌潜力的具体技术问题。众所周知,接触某些矿物纤维(如石棉和石棉)会对人体健康产生有害影响,欧洲理事会在2023年将接触限度定为0.01毫立方英尺/立方厘米。在这方面,体外试验在初步确定矿物纤维的潜在危险方面起着至关重要的作用,尽管目前在选择适当的浓度指标和剂量方面存在争议。在这里,我们解决了当前规范化方法(即质量规范化和纤维数规范化)的复杂技术问题及其优缺点,最终得出结论,应该推荐大规模规范化。事实上,考虑到具有相同化学成分的两种纤维,质量正态化保证了原子种类和诱导ros的金属的浓度保持相等,而该参数随着纤维数正态化而成为一个额外的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro testing of hazardous mineral fibres: The issue of the concentration metric
This communication addresses the matter of the appropriate concentration metrics for the in vitro testing of mineral fibres, a specific technical issue affecting the correct determination of their toxic/carcinogenic potential. The exposure to certain mineral fibres (e.g., asbestos and erionite) is well-known for its detrimental effects on human health, with caution exposure limits set to 0.01 ff/cm3 by the European Council in 2023. In this regard, in vitro tests have a crucial role in the preliminary determination of the hazardous potential of mineral fibres, although selecting the appropriate concentration metrics and doses is currently controversial. Here, we address the complex technical issues of the current normalisation methods (i.e., mass normalization and fibre number normalization) with their advantages and disadvantages, ultimately concluding that mass normalisation should be recommended. In fact, considering two fibrous species with the same chemical composition, mass normalisation guarantees that the concentration of atomic species and ROS-inducing metals remains equal, while this parameter becomes an additional variable with fibre number normalisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
185
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes the results of studies concerning toxic and pharmacological effects of (human and veterinary) drugs and of environmental contaminants in animals and man. Areas of special interest are: molecular mechanisms of toxicity, biotransformation and toxicokinetics (including toxicokinetic modelling), molecular, biochemical and physiological mechanisms explaining differences in sensitivity between species and individuals, the characterisation of pathophysiological models and mechanisms involved in the development of effects and the identification of biological markers that can be used to study exposure and effects in man and animals. In addition to full length papers, short communications, full-length reviews and mini-reviews, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology will publish in depth assessments of special problem areas. The latter publications may exceed the length of a full length paper three to fourfold. A basic requirement is that the assessments are made under the auspices of international groups of leading experts in the fields concerned. The information examined may either consist of data that were already published, or of new data that were obtained within the framework of collaborative research programmes. Provision is also made for the acceptance of minireviews on (classes of) compounds, toxicities or mechanisms, debating recent advances in rapidly developing fields that fall within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信