“悲伤存在于世界其他地方看不到的泡沫中”:探索Covid-19大流行期间失去亲人的人的传记中断和意义创造

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily Harrop , Kali Barawi , Francesca Mazzaschi , Anna Torrens-Burton , Eileen Sutton , Emma Gilbert , Donna Wakefield , Silvia Goss , Kathy Seddon , Mirella Longo , Lucy E. Selman
{"title":"“悲伤存在于世界其他地方看不到的泡沫中”:探索Covid-19大流行期间失去亲人的人的传记中断和意义创造","authors":"Emily Harrop ,&nbsp;Kali Barawi ,&nbsp;Francesca Mazzaschi ,&nbsp;Anna Torrens-Burton ,&nbsp;Eileen Sutton ,&nbsp;Emma Gilbert ,&nbsp;Donna Wakefield ,&nbsp;Silvia Goss ,&nbsp;Kathy Seddon ,&nbsp;Mirella Longo ,&nbsp;Lucy E. Selman","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced profoundly altered death, mourning and grieving practices. Worsened grief outcomes have been widely reported but less is known about how people coped during these unprecedented times. Using reflexive thematic analysis critically informed by theories of biographical disruption and meaning-making, we analysed 39 interview transcripts from 24 people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK. We describe five core domains of disruption and associated meaning making: difficult and traumatic death experiences; disrupted mourning practices; loss of relationship and sense of self; social relationships, isolation and support; and developing understandings of grief. While the multi-dimensionality and severity of the disruption experienced was striking, so too were the ways in which people reappraised and reconstructed more positive and coherent accounts, often in relational ways, helping to explain their varied grief and coping experiences. Findings demonstrate the utility of critically combining these theoretical frameworks for conceptualising and contextualising grieving during ‘extraordinary’, as well as more ‘ordinary’ times. Implications are identified for minimising the disruption inherent in stressful bereavement circumstances, whilst also supporting people to reconcile and make meaning in their experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118518"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The grief exists in a bubble that the rest of the world doesn't see”: Exploring biographical disruption and meaning-making amongst people bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Emily Harrop ,&nbsp;Kali Barawi ,&nbsp;Francesca Mazzaschi ,&nbsp;Anna Torrens-Burton ,&nbsp;Eileen Sutton ,&nbsp;Emma Gilbert ,&nbsp;Donna Wakefield ,&nbsp;Silvia Goss ,&nbsp;Kathy Seddon ,&nbsp;Mirella Longo ,&nbsp;Lucy E. Selman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>People bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced profoundly altered death, mourning and grieving practices. Worsened grief outcomes have been widely reported but less is known about how people coped during these unprecedented times. Using reflexive thematic analysis critically informed by theories of biographical disruption and meaning-making, we analysed 39 interview transcripts from 24 people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK. We describe five core domains of disruption and associated meaning making: difficult and traumatic death experiences; disrupted mourning practices; loss of relationship and sense of self; social relationships, isolation and support; and developing understandings of grief. While the multi-dimensionality and severity of the disruption experienced was striking, so too were the ways in which people reappraised and reconstructed more positive and coherent accounts, often in relational ways, helping to explain their varied grief and coping experiences. Findings demonstrate the utility of critically combining these theoretical frameworks for conceptualising and contextualising grieving during ‘extraordinary’, as well as more ‘ordinary’ times. Implications are identified for minimising the disruption inherent in stressful bereavement circumstances, whilst also supporting people to reconcile and make meaning in their experiences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"384 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间失去亲人的人经历了深刻改变的死亡、哀悼和悲伤做法。更严重的悲伤结果已经被广泛报道,但很少有人知道人们是如何应对这些前所未有的时期的。我们利用反身性主题分析,在传记中断和意义创造理论的批判性指导下,分析了来自24名英国大流行期间失去亲人的人的39份访谈记录。我们描述了破坏和相关意义创造的五个核心领域:困难和创伤性死亡经历;中断哀悼活动;失去人际关系和自我意识;社会关系、孤立和支持;发展对悲伤的理解。虽然所经历的破坏的多维度和严重性令人震惊,但人们重新评估和重建更积极、更连贯的描述的方式也令人震惊,通常是以关系的方式,帮助解释他们不同的悲伤和应对经历。研究结果表明,批判性地结合这些理论框架,在“特殊”时期以及更“普通”时期概念化和背景化悲伤。确定的影响是最大限度地减少在紧张的丧亲环境中固有的破坏,同时也支持人们在他们的经历中和解和创造意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The grief exists in a bubble that the rest of the world doesn't see”: Exploring biographical disruption and meaning-making amongst people bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic
People bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced profoundly altered death, mourning and grieving practices. Worsened grief outcomes have been widely reported but less is known about how people coped during these unprecedented times. Using reflexive thematic analysis critically informed by theories of biographical disruption and meaning-making, we analysed 39 interview transcripts from 24 people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK. We describe five core domains of disruption and associated meaning making: difficult and traumatic death experiences; disrupted mourning practices; loss of relationship and sense of self; social relationships, isolation and support; and developing understandings of grief. While the multi-dimensionality and severity of the disruption experienced was striking, so too were the ways in which people reappraised and reconstructed more positive and coherent accounts, often in relational ways, helping to explain their varied grief and coping experiences. Findings demonstrate the utility of critically combining these theoretical frameworks for conceptualising and contextualising grieving during ‘extraordinary’, as well as more ‘ordinary’ times. Implications are identified for minimising the disruption inherent in stressful bereavement circumstances, whilst also supporting people to reconcile and make meaning in their experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信