Shawei He , Peng Sun , Jiangying Qin , Changmin Jiang
{"title":"基于两步预见冲突解决的图模型分析航空公司网络选择竞争","authors":"Shawei He , Peng Sun , Jiangying Qin , Changmin Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The selection of network structures is instrumental for airlines to gain upper hand in market competition. In the existing research, game theoretical methodologies are utilized to provide equilibria for suggesting strategies in competition. Nowadays, utilities for airlines are increasingly affected by factors which are difficult to calibrate, such as geopolitical events. Besides, airlines as wise decision makers not only consider the strategic moves in the foresight of one step, but also what could be the counteractions from opponent airlines. In this paper, the selection of network structures between two competing airlines are investigated using graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), an effective methodology for solving strategic conflicts. The equilibria of competition are calculated without the requirement of explicit expression of utilities, and reflecting the perception of each airlines in two steps. Theorems are provided to indicate the existence of the equilibria in the competition, including Nash equilibria and sequentially stable (SEQ) equilibria for the foresight of two steps. Comparing with the equilibria calculated in the existing literature based on the same modelling settings, the Nash equilibria suggested by GMCR are consistent with those calculated by classical game theory approach. Besides, GMCR can indicate SEQ equilibria as an enhanced understanding of competition reflecting longer foresights of DMs. In particular, the SEQ equilibria in Scenarios 1 and 2 of this paper indicate alternative strategies by adopting which both airlines could be more profitable compared with the strategies suggested by Nash equilibria. As demonstrated in this paper, GMCR not only requires less information in modelling, but is also capable of providing more insightful strategies for DMs in aviation industry. Moreover, the framework of addressing the network selection problem using GMCR could provide a useful paradigm for analyzing wider range of strategic competition problems in aviation industry in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Air Transport Management","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing network selection competition between airlines using Graph Model for Conflict Resolution in the foresight of two steps\",\"authors\":\"Shawei He , Peng Sun , Jiangying Qin , Changmin Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The selection of network structures is instrumental for airlines to gain upper hand in market competition. In the existing research, game theoretical methodologies are utilized to provide equilibria for suggesting strategies in competition. Nowadays, utilities for airlines are increasingly affected by factors which are difficult to calibrate, such as geopolitical events. Besides, airlines as wise decision makers not only consider the strategic moves in the foresight of one step, but also what could be the counteractions from opponent airlines. In this paper, the selection of network structures between two competing airlines are investigated using graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), an effective methodology for solving strategic conflicts. The equilibria of competition are calculated without the requirement of explicit expression of utilities, and reflecting the perception of each airlines in two steps. Theorems are provided to indicate the existence of the equilibria in the competition, including Nash equilibria and sequentially stable (SEQ) equilibria for the foresight of two steps. Comparing with the equilibria calculated in the existing literature based on the same modelling settings, the Nash equilibria suggested by GMCR are consistent with those calculated by classical game theory approach. Besides, GMCR can indicate SEQ equilibria as an enhanced understanding of competition reflecting longer foresights of DMs. In particular, the SEQ equilibria in Scenarios 1 and 2 of this paper indicate alternative strategies by adopting which both airlines could be more profitable compared with the strategies suggested by Nash equilibria. As demonstrated in this paper, GMCR not only requires less information in modelling, but is also capable of providing more insightful strategies for DMs in aviation industry. Moreover, the framework of addressing the network selection problem using GMCR could provide a useful paradigm for analyzing wider range of strategic competition problems in aviation industry in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Air Transport Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699725001565\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Air Transport Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699725001565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing network selection competition between airlines using Graph Model for Conflict Resolution in the foresight of two steps
The selection of network structures is instrumental for airlines to gain upper hand in market competition. In the existing research, game theoretical methodologies are utilized to provide equilibria for suggesting strategies in competition. Nowadays, utilities for airlines are increasingly affected by factors which are difficult to calibrate, such as geopolitical events. Besides, airlines as wise decision makers not only consider the strategic moves in the foresight of one step, but also what could be the counteractions from opponent airlines. In this paper, the selection of network structures between two competing airlines are investigated using graph model for conflict resolution (GMCR), an effective methodology for solving strategic conflicts. The equilibria of competition are calculated without the requirement of explicit expression of utilities, and reflecting the perception of each airlines in two steps. Theorems are provided to indicate the existence of the equilibria in the competition, including Nash equilibria and sequentially stable (SEQ) equilibria for the foresight of two steps. Comparing with the equilibria calculated in the existing literature based on the same modelling settings, the Nash equilibria suggested by GMCR are consistent with those calculated by classical game theory approach. Besides, GMCR can indicate SEQ equilibria as an enhanced understanding of competition reflecting longer foresights of DMs. In particular, the SEQ equilibria in Scenarios 1 and 2 of this paper indicate alternative strategies by adopting which both airlines could be more profitable compared with the strategies suggested by Nash equilibria. As demonstrated in this paper, GMCR not only requires less information in modelling, but is also capable of providing more insightful strategies for DMs in aviation industry. Moreover, the framework of addressing the network selection problem using GMCR could provide a useful paradigm for analyzing wider range of strategic competition problems in aviation industry in the future.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Air Transport Management (JATM) sets out to address, through high quality research articles and authoritative commentary, the major economic, management and policy issues facing the air transport industry today. It offers practitioners and academics an international and dynamic forum for analysis and discussion of these issues, linking research and practice and stimulating interaction between the two. The refereed papers in the journal cover all the major sectors of the industry (airlines, airports, air traffic management) as well as related areas such as tourism management and logistics. Papers are blind reviewed, normally by two referees, chosen for their specialist knowledge. The journal provides independent, original and rigorous analysis in the areas of: • Policy, regulation and law • Strategy • Operations • Marketing • Economics and finance • Sustainability