通过个人防护装备提高骑车人的安全:调查动力两轮车款式对安全带安全夹克性能的影响

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
A. Perticone, D. Barbani, N. Baldanzini
{"title":"通过个人防护装备提高骑车人的安全:调查动力两轮车款式对安全带安全夹克性能的影响","authors":"A. Perticone,&nbsp;D. Barbani,&nbsp;N. Baldanzini","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>According to the World Health Organization, approximately 28 % of global road deaths are sustained by riders. This study contributes to bridging the existent safety gap between car drivers and riders by assessing the influence of Powered Two-Wheeler (PTW) styles on the performance of a new piece of personal protective equipment (PPE) for riders. The tested PPE is a device concept called Belted Safety Jacket (BSJ), comprised of a vest with safety belts to provide increased safety by restricting the rider’s movements during crashes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Three PTWs with different styles were modeled in a multi-body environment: sport-touring, scooter, and sport. The MADYMO MATD dummy was selected for the rider, and the GeoMetro car model was the opposing vehicle. Twenty-five crash configurations of the ISO 13232 database were reproduced in the virtual environment. Five biomechanical indices estimated the injuries in four body regions: head, neck, chest, and lower extremities. Two sets of simulations were run without and with the BSJ for a comparative assessment. The first set identified the influence of PTW styles on crash outcomes, while the second on BSJ performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Serious injuries (AIS3+) occurred predominantly at high relative speed (<em>&gt; 40.5 km/h</em>) but involved different body regions depending on the PTW. The scooter showed more severe injuries to the chest and less severe to the head, while sport and sport-touring acted similarly with more serious injuries to the head. After introducing the BSJ, AIS3+ injuries were eliminated below 40.5 km/h and significantly reduced up to 81.0 km/h. Overall, the BSJ reduced AIS3+ injuries in frontal and lateral crashes by 74 % and 59 %, respectively, and specifically, the BSJ canceled such injuries for the sport in frontal crashes and the scooter in laterals, while the sport-touring maintained similar reductions (-60 % in frontals and -67 % in laterals). The BSJ performance was, therefore, not negatively affected by the PTW style, demonstrating high protection potential for every rider with more average benefit obtained than risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study evidenced no influence of the PTW style on the BSJ performance besides the inherent differences the styles entail on the riders’ injury outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing rider safety through personal protective equipment: investigating the influence of powered two-wheeler styles on the performance of the belted safety jacket\",\"authors\":\"A. Perticone,&nbsp;D. Barbani,&nbsp;N. Baldanzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>According to the World Health Organization, approximately 28 % of global road deaths are sustained by riders. This study contributes to bridging the existent safety gap between car drivers and riders by assessing the influence of Powered Two-Wheeler (PTW) styles on the performance of a new piece of personal protective equipment (PPE) for riders. The tested PPE is a device concept called Belted Safety Jacket (BSJ), comprised of a vest with safety belts to provide increased safety by restricting the rider’s movements during crashes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Three PTWs with different styles were modeled in a multi-body environment: sport-touring, scooter, and sport. The MADYMO MATD dummy was selected for the rider, and the GeoMetro car model was the opposing vehicle. Twenty-five crash configurations of the ISO 13232 database were reproduced in the virtual environment. Five biomechanical indices estimated the injuries in four body regions: head, neck, chest, and lower extremities. Two sets of simulations were run without and with the BSJ for a comparative assessment. The first set identified the influence of PTW styles on crash outcomes, while the second on BSJ performance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Serious injuries (AIS3+) occurred predominantly at high relative speed (<em>&gt; 40.5 km/h</em>) but involved different body regions depending on the PTW. The scooter showed more severe injuries to the chest and less severe to the head, while sport and sport-touring acted similarly with more serious injuries to the head. After introducing the BSJ, AIS3+ injuries were eliminated below 40.5 km/h and significantly reduced up to 81.0 km/h. Overall, the BSJ reduced AIS3+ injuries in frontal and lateral crashes by 74 % and 59 %, respectively, and specifically, the BSJ canceled such injuries for the sport in frontal crashes and the scooter in laterals, while the sport-touring maintained similar reductions (-60 % in frontals and -67 % in laterals). The BSJ performance was, therefore, not negatively affected by the PTW style, demonstrating high protection potential for every rider with more average benefit obtained than risk.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study evidenced no influence of the PTW style on the BSJ performance besides the inherent differences the styles entail on the riders’ injury outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据世界卫生组织统计,全球约28%的道路死亡是由骑车者造成的。本研究通过评估动力两轮车(PTW)风格对骑手个人防护装备(PPE)性能的影响,有助于弥合汽车驾驶员和骑手之间存在的安全差距。被测试的PPE是一种被称为束带安全夹克(BSJ)的装置概念,由一件带有安全带的背心组成,通过限制骑手在碰撞时的活动来提高安全性。方法在运动-旅行、滑板车和运动三种多体环境下对三种不同风格的PTWs进行建模。骑手选用MADYMO MATD假人,对面车辆选用GeoMetro汽车模型。在虚拟环境中再现了ISO 13232数据库的25个崩溃配置。5项生物力学指标评估了头部、颈部、胸部和下肢四个身体区域的损伤情况。在没有BSJ和有BSJ的情况下运行了两组模拟,以进行比较评估。第一组确定了PTW风格对崩溃结果的影响,而第二组确定了BSJ表现的影响。结果严重损伤(AIS3+)主要发生在高速(> 40.5 km/h)时,但因PTW不同而涉及不同的身体部位。滑板车对胸部的伤害更严重,对头部的伤害较小,而运动和运动旅行对头部的伤害相似,更严重。引入BSJ后,在40.5 km/h以下消除了AIS3+伤害,在81.0 km/h以下显著降低了AIS3+伤害。总体而言,BSJ在正面碰撞和侧面碰撞中分别减少了74%和59%的AIS3+损伤,具体来说,BSJ在正面碰撞和侧面碰撞中消除了此类损伤,而运动旅游保持了类似的减少(正面碰撞- 60%,侧面碰撞- 67%)。因此,BSJ的性能没有受到PTW风格的负面影响,显示出对每个骑手的高保护潜力,平均收益大于风险。结论除了两种运动方式对运动员损伤结果的内在差异外,本研究并未证实PTW运动方式对运动员BSJ成绩的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing rider safety through personal protective equipment: investigating the influence of powered two-wheeler styles on the performance of the belted safety jacket

Objective

According to the World Health Organization, approximately 28 % of global road deaths are sustained by riders. This study contributes to bridging the existent safety gap between car drivers and riders by assessing the influence of Powered Two-Wheeler (PTW) styles on the performance of a new piece of personal protective equipment (PPE) for riders. The tested PPE is a device concept called Belted Safety Jacket (BSJ), comprised of a vest with safety belts to provide increased safety by restricting the rider’s movements during crashes.

Method

Three PTWs with different styles were modeled in a multi-body environment: sport-touring, scooter, and sport. The MADYMO MATD dummy was selected for the rider, and the GeoMetro car model was the opposing vehicle. Twenty-five crash configurations of the ISO 13232 database were reproduced in the virtual environment. Five biomechanical indices estimated the injuries in four body regions: head, neck, chest, and lower extremities. Two sets of simulations were run without and with the BSJ for a comparative assessment. The first set identified the influence of PTW styles on crash outcomes, while the second on BSJ performance.

Results

Serious injuries (AIS3+) occurred predominantly at high relative speed (> 40.5 km/h) but involved different body regions depending on the PTW. The scooter showed more severe injuries to the chest and less severe to the head, while sport and sport-touring acted similarly with more serious injuries to the head. After introducing the BSJ, AIS3+ injuries were eliminated below 40.5 km/h and significantly reduced up to 81.0 km/h. Overall, the BSJ reduced AIS3+ injuries in frontal and lateral crashes by 74 % and 59 %, respectively, and specifically, the BSJ canceled such injuries for the sport in frontal crashes and the scooter in laterals, while the sport-touring maintained similar reductions (-60 % in frontals and -67 % in laterals). The BSJ performance was, therefore, not negatively affected by the PTW style, demonstrating high protection potential for every rider with more average benefit obtained than risk.

Conclusions

This study evidenced no influence of the PTW style on the BSJ performance besides the inherent differences the styles entail on the riders’ injury outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信