Ziyu Qin , Jianhui Ruan , Hui Yu , Jieyi Li , Chen Lyu , Bofeng Cai , Shouyang Wang , Ling Tang
{"title":"中国国家碳排放交易机制在减少企业排放方面的有效性","authors":"Ziyu Qin , Jianhui Ruan , Hui Yu , Jieyi Li , Chen Lyu , Bofeng Cai , Shouyang Wang , Ling Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China's national emissions trading scheme (ETS), announced in 2017, has become the largest carbon market worldwide, operating alongside pre-existing regional pilots. However, detailed assessments regarding the newly constructed national ETS, particularly in comparison with the regional pilots, remain limited. Using unit-level monitoring data from China's power sector and combining intermediary and moderate models, this study investigates the carbon mitigation impact of China's national ETS relative to pilot ETSs. We find that while both the national and pilot ETSs significantly reduce carbon intensities, the effect was more pronounced in pilots. A mechanism behind this reduction is the improvement in fuel quality, as evidenced by a decrease in carbon content. Regional economic growth and a higher share of industrial activity appear to offset the policy's overall effectiveness. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the mitigation effects were greater in smaller and older units compared to their larger or newer counterparts. Our unit-level empirical evaluation of China's national ETS not only advances theoretical understanding of emissions trading mechanisms but also provides actionable insights for refining or establishing carbon market policies in emerging economies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108829"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of China's national emissions trading scheme in mitigating firm emissions\",\"authors\":\"Ziyu Qin , Jianhui Ruan , Hui Yu , Jieyi Li , Chen Lyu , Bofeng Cai , Shouyang Wang , Ling Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>China's national emissions trading scheme (ETS), announced in 2017, has become the largest carbon market worldwide, operating alongside pre-existing regional pilots. However, detailed assessments regarding the newly constructed national ETS, particularly in comparison with the regional pilots, remain limited. Using unit-level monitoring data from China's power sector and combining intermediary and moderate models, this study investigates the carbon mitigation impact of China's national ETS relative to pilot ETSs. We find that while both the national and pilot ETSs significantly reduce carbon intensities, the effect was more pronounced in pilots. A mechanism behind this reduction is the improvement in fuel quality, as evidenced by a decrease in carbon content. Regional economic growth and a higher share of industrial activity appear to offset the policy's overall effectiveness. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the mitigation effects were greater in smaller and older units compared to their larger or newer counterparts. Our unit-level empirical evaluation of China's national ETS not only advances theoretical understanding of emissions trading mechanisms but also provides actionable insights for refining or establishing carbon market policies in emerging economies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108829\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006565\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effectiveness of China's national emissions trading scheme in mitigating firm emissions
China's national emissions trading scheme (ETS), announced in 2017, has become the largest carbon market worldwide, operating alongside pre-existing regional pilots. However, detailed assessments regarding the newly constructed national ETS, particularly in comparison with the regional pilots, remain limited. Using unit-level monitoring data from China's power sector and combining intermediary and moderate models, this study investigates the carbon mitigation impact of China's national ETS relative to pilot ETSs. We find that while both the national and pilot ETSs significantly reduce carbon intensities, the effect was more pronounced in pilots. A mechanism behind this reduction is the improvement in fuel quality, as evidenced by a decrease in carbon content. Regional economic growth and a higher share of industrial activity appear to offset the policy's overall effectiveness. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the mitigation effects were greater in smaller and older units compared to their larger or newer counterparts. Our unit-level empirical evaluation of China's national ETS not only advances theoretical understanding of emissions trading mechanisms but also provides actionable insights for refining or establishing carbon market policies in emerging economies.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.