接受使用多种运输方式选择的众包交付任务

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Qiang Qi , Soora Rasouli , Tao Feng
{"title":"接受使用多种运输方式选择的众包交付任务","authors":"Qiang Qi ,&nbsp;Soora Rasouli ,&nbsp;Tao Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increase in E-commerce has led to substantial demand for parcel delivery across the world that courier companies have to deploy more dedicated delivery vehicles to satisfy the demand. The emission and congestion caused by these vehicles, especially in dense urban areas, exacerbate in the future if not dealt with timely. Crowd-Sourced Delivery (CSD) can be seen as a means to offset part of the delivery demand dealt with by commercial couriers. Within this system, the ordinary travelers are proposed to deliver a parcel during their pre-planned trips. In order to minimize the environmental footprint of parcel deliveries, it would be ideal for CSD tasks to be accepted while using active and public transportation. (Empirical) studies, so far, have mainly focused on one particular transportation mode when offering CSD tasks. This approach prevents identifying the relative potential of modes in the full mobility system<em>.</em> The aim of this study is therefore to broaden our understanding regarding potential of different modes in facilitating CSD adoption. For the operational feasibility of the service, we proposed to integrate CSD within Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) framework. In the context of CSD-MaaS integration, it is expected that potential crowd-shippers adopting different transportation modes exhibit varying preferences regarding CSD tasks they are being allocated due to distinct features associated with various modes. To understand the willingness of travelers to accept a CSD task across different transportation modes, and features of CSD tasks suitable for users of different modes, in this study a stated choice experiment was designed in which the respondents were allowed to simultaneously choose transportation modes and evaluate parcel delivery tasks. An error component mixed logit model was employed to assess the effects of various transportation and parcel related factors on travelers’ decisions while accounting for the correlation between transportation modes with similar features. The results indicate that the willingness to accept a parcel delivery task varies significantly across transportation modes. Car-based modes, particularly private cars, were the most preferred, while sustainable modes such as private (E-)bikes and public transport demonstrated notable potential. Conversely, emerging shared mobility modes were less favored as carriers in CSD. Additionally, delivery task characteristics, travel contexts, and socio-demographic factors significantly influenced the decision to accept a delivery task, with varying effects across transportation modes. These findings provide critical insights for transportation planners and transport operators, contributing to the development of more sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48378,"journal":{"name":"Transport Policy","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103796"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options\",\"authors\":\"Qiang Qi ,&nbsp;Soora Rasouli ,&nbsp;Tao Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increase in E-commerce has led to substantial demand for parcel delivery across the world that courier companies have to deploy more dedicated delivery vehicles to satisfy the demand. The emission and congestion caused by these vehicles, especially in dense urban areas, exacerbate in the future if not dealt with timely. Crowd-Sourced Delivery (CSD) can be seen as a means to offset part of the delivery demand dealt with by commercial couriers. Within this system, the ordinary travelers are proposed to deliver a parcel during their pre-planned trips. In order to minimize the environmental footprint of parcel deliveries, it would be ideal for CSD tasks to be accepted while using active and public transportation. (Empirical) studies, so far, have mainly focused on one particular transportation mode when offering CSD tasks. This approach prevents identifying the relative potential of modes in the full mobility system<em>.</em> The aim of this study is therefore to broaden our understanding regarding potential of different modes in facilitating CSD adoption. For the operational feasibility of the service, we proposed to integrate CSD within Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) framework. In the context of CSD-MaaS integration, it is expected that potential crowd-shippers adopting different transportation modes exhibit varying preferences regarding CSD tasks they are being allocated due to distinct features associated with various modes. To understand the willingness of travelers to accept a CSD task across different transportation modes, and features of CSD tasks suitable for users of different modes, in this study a stated choice experiment was designed in which the respondents were allowed to simultaneously choose transportation modes and evaluate parcel delivery tasks. An error component mixed logit model was employed to assess the effects of various transportation and parcel related factors on travelers’ decisions while accounting for the correlation between transportation modes with similar features. The results indicate that the willingness to accept a parcel delivery task varies significantly across transportation modes. Car-based modes, particularly private cars, were the most preferred, while sustainable modes such as private (E-)bikes and public transport demonstrated notable potential. Conversely, emerging shared mobility modes were less favored as carriers in CSD. Additionally, delivery task characteristics, travel contexts, and socio-demographic factors significantly influenced the decision to accept a delivery task, with varying effects across transportation modes. These findings provide critical insights for transportation planners and transport operators, contributing to the development of more sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"173 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子商务的增长导致了全球对包裹递送的大量需求,快递公司不得不部署更多的专用送货车辆来满足需求。这些车辆造成的排放和拥堵,特别是在人口密集的城市地区,如果不及时处理,未来会加剧。众包派递(CSD)可被视为抵消部分由商业派递处理的派递需求的一种手段。在这个系统中,普通旅客被建议在他们预先计划的旅行中投递包裹。为了尽量减少包裹递送对环境的影响,在使用公共交通工具的同时接受政府部门的任务是最理想的。到目前为止,(实证)研究主要集中在提供CSD任务时的一种特定运输模式。这种方法阻碍了在全移动系统中识别模式的相对潜力。因此,这项研究的目的是扩大我们对不同模式在促进社会发展方面的潜力的认识。为了服务的操作可行性,我们建议将CSD集成到移动即服务(MaaS)框架中。在CSD- maas整合的背景下,预计采用不同运输方式的潜在人群运输者对分配给他们的CSD任务表现出不同的偏好,因为不同的运输方式具有不同的特征。为了了解不同运输方式下的旅客接受CSD任务的意愿,以及不同运输方式下CSD任务的特点,本研究设计了一个陈述选择实验,允许被调查者同时选择运输方式和评估包裹递送任务。采用误差分量混合logit模型,在考虑具有相似特征的运输方式之间的相关性的同时,评估各种运输和包裹相关因素对出行者决策的影响。结果表明,接受包裹递送任务的意愿在不同的运输方式之间存在显著差异。以汽车为基础的交通方式,尤其是私家车,是最受欢迎的,而私人(电动)自行车和公共交通等可持续发展的交通方式则显示出显著的潜力。相反,新兴的共享移动模式在CSD中不太受青睐。此外,配送任务特征、出行环境和社会人口因素显著影响着接受配送任务的决定,不同的运输方式对配送任务的影响各不相同。这些发现为交通规划者和运输运营商提供了重要的见解,有助于开发更可持续、更高效的最后一英里交付解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options
The increase in E-commerce has led to substantial demand for parcel delivery across the world that courier companies have to deploy more dedicated delivery vehicles to satisfy the demand. The emission and congestion caused by these vehicles, especially in dense urban areas, exacerbate in the future if not dealt with timely. Crowd-Sourced Delivery (CSD) can be seen as a means to offset part of the delivery demand dealt with by commercial couriers. Within this system, the ordinary travelers are proposed to deliver a parcel during their pre-planned trips. In order to minimize the environmental footprint of parcel deliveries, it would be ideal for CSD tasks to be accepted while using active and public transportation. (Empirical) studies, so far, have mainly focused on one particular transportation mode when offering CSD tasks. This approach prevents identifying the relative potential of modes in the full mobility system. The aim of this study is therefore to broaden our understanding regarding potential of different modes in facilitating CSD adoption. For the operational feasibility of the service, we proposed to integrate CSD within Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) framework. In the context of CSD-MaaS integration, it is expected that potential crowd-shippers adopting different transportation modes exhibit varying preferences regarding CSD tasks they are being allocated due to distinct features associated with various modes. To understand the willingness of travelers to accept a CSD task across different transportation modes, and features of CSD tasks suitable for users of different modes, in this study a stated choice experiment was designed in which the respondents were allowed to simultaneously choose transportation modes and evaluate parcel delivery tasks. An error component mixed logit model was employed to assess the effects of various transportation and parcel related factors on travelers’ decisions while accounting for the correlation between transportation modes with similar features. The results indicate that the willingness to accept a parcel delivery task varies significantly across transportation modes. Car-based modes, particularly private cars, were the most preferred, while sustainable modes such as private (E-)bikes and public transport demonstrated notable potential. Conversely, emerging shared mobility modes were less favored as carriers in CSD. Additionally, delivery task characteristics, travel contexts, and socio-demographic factors significantly influenced the decision to accept a delivery task, with varying effects across transportation modes. These findings provide critical insights for transportation planners and transport operators, contributing to the development of more sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Policy
Transport Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
282
期刊介绍: Transport Policy is an international journal aimed at bridging the gap between theory and practice in transport. Its subject areas reflect the concerns of policymakers in government, industry, voluntary organisations and the public at large, providing independent, original and rigorous analysis to understand how policy decisions have been taken, monitor their effects, and suggest how they may be improved. The journal treats the transport sector comprehensively, and in the context of other sectors including energy, housing, industry and planning. All modes are covered: land, sea and air; road and rail; public and private; motorised and non-motorised; passenger and freight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信