通过定性内容分析调查菲律宾电气化政策的社会可持续性

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Allen Lemuel G. Lemence , Jordi C. Cravioto , Benjamin C. McLellan
{"title":"通过定性内容分析调查菲律宾电气化政策的社会可持续性","authors":"Allen Lemuel G. Lemence ,&nbsp;Jordi C. Cravioto ,&nbsp;Benjamin C. McLellan","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Philippines continues to face challenges in achieving full electrification while ensuring sustainability. Although recent policies such as the Renewable Energy Act and the Microgrid Systems Act reflect efforts to achieve full electrification, the extent to which social sustainability is integrated into these policies remains unclear. Recognizing this gap, this study examines the extent to which social sustainability is integrated in Philippine energy policies focused on rural electrification. Using qualitative content analysis (QCA), the study systematically analyzed relevant laws and guidelines issued by government agencies. A set of codes corresponding to social sustainability categories was applied to identify patterns and potential gaps. Key findings reveal six prominent social sustainability categories, including energy access (emphasizing full electrification); socio-economic benefits and employment (highlighting financial benefits and affordable electricity); involvement and governance (enhancing stakeholder participation in policy decisions); social development, well-being, and quality of life (addressing environmental concerns); social equity (focusing on distributive and procedural aspects); and health and safety (prioritizing public health and pollution mitigation). Underrepresented categories, such as social acceptance, gender, human rights, and education, indicate policy gaps that warrant further integration. This study advances theory by introducing a coding framework that identifies social sustainability dimensions from national energy policies. It also offers practical value by providing empirical insights to enhance policy inclusivity and a transferable approach for similar assessments in other national contexts, particularly in developing countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 101817"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating social sustainability in Philippine electrification policies through qualitative content analysis\",\"authors\":\"Allen Lemuel G. Lemence ,&nbsp;Jordi C. Cravioto ,&nbsp;Benjamin C. McLellan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Philippines continues to face challenges in achieving full electrification while ensuring sustainability. Although recent policies such as the Renewable Energy Act and the Microgrid Systems Act reflect efforts to achieve full electrification, the extent to which social sustainability is integrated into these policies remains unclear. Recognizing this gap, this study examines the extent to which social sustainability is integrated in Philippine energy policies focused on rural electrification. Using qualitative content analysis (QCA), the study systematically analyzed relevant laws and guidelines issued by government agencies. A set of codes corresponding to social sustainability categories was applied to identify patterns and potential gaps. Key findings reveal six prominent social sustainability categories, including energy access (emphasizing full electrification); socio-economic benefits and employment (highlighting financial benefits and affordable electricity); involvement and governance (enhancing stakeholder participation in policy decisions); social development, well-being, and quality of life (addressing environmental concerns); social equity (focusing on distributive and procedural aspects); and health and safety (prioritizing public health and pollution mitigation). Underrepresented categories, such as social acceptance, gender, human rights, and education, indicate policy gaps that warrant further integration. This study advances theory by introducing a coding framework that identifies social sustainability dimensions from national energy policies. It also offers practical value by providing empirical insights to enhance policy inclusivity and a transferable approach for similar assessments in other national contexts, particularly in developing countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"88 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy for Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097308262500167X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S097308262500167X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

菲律宾在实现全面电气化同时确保可持续性方面继续面临挑战。虽然最近的政策,如《可再生能源法》和《微电网系统法》反映了实现全面电气化的努力,但社会可持续性在多大程度上被纳入这些政策仍不清楚。认识到这一差距,本研究考察了社会可持续性在菲律宾能源政策中整合的程度,重点是农村电气化。本研究采用定性内容分析(QCA)方法,系统分析了政府部门颁布的相关法律和指导方针。采用了一套与社会可持续性类别相对应的守则来确定模式和潜在差距。主要发现揭示了六个突出的社会可持续性类别,包括能源获取(强调全面电气化);社会经济效益和就业(强调经济效益和负担得起的电力);参与和治理(加强利益相关者对决策的参与);社会发展、福祉和生活质量(解决环境问题);社会公平(侧重于分配和程序方面);健康和安全(优先考虑公共健康和减少污染)。代表性不足的类别,如社会接受、性别、人权和教育,表明了需要进一步整合的政策差距。本研究通过引入一个从国家能源政策中识别社会可持续性维度的编码框架来推进理论。它还提供了增强政策包容性的经验见解,并为其他国家(特别是发展中国家)的类似评估提供了可转让的方法,具有实用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating social sustainability in Philippine electrification policies through qualitative content analysis
The Philippines continues to face challenges in achieving full electrification while ensuring sustainability. Although recent policies such as the Renewable Energy Act and the Microgrid Systems Act reflect efforts to achieve full electrification, the extent to which social sustainability is integrated into these policies remains unclear. Recognizing this gap, this study examines the extent to which social sustainability is integrated in Philippine energy policies focused on rural electrification. Using qualitative content analysis (QCA), the study systematically analyzed relevant laws and guidelines issued by government agencies. A set of codes corresponding to social sustainability categories was applied to identify patterns and potential gaps. Key findings reveal six prominent social sustainability categories, including energy access (emphasizing full electrification); socio-economic benefits and employment (highlighting financial benefits and affordable electricity); involvement and governance (enhancing stakeholder participation in policy decisions); social development, well-being, and quality of life (addressing environmental concerns); social equity (focusing on distributive and procedural aspects); and health and safety (prioritizing public health and pollution mitigation). Underrepresented categories, such as social acceptance, gender, human rights, and education, indicate policy gaps that warrant further integration. This study advances theory by introducing a coding framework that identifies social sustainability dimensions from national energy policies. It also offers practical value by providing empirical insights to enhance policy inclusivity and a transferable approach for similar assessments in other national contexts, particularly in developing countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信