对新诊断为种系阴性上皮性卵巢癌的患者实施分步体细胞检测

IF 1.3 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Casey L. Lawler , Sara M. Klennert , Kristin C. Cole , Karen S. Schaepe , Laura J. Ongie , Megan E. Grudem , Carolyn M. Klampe , Myra J. Wick , Vonda M. Wall , Sanjna Rajput , Clarissa L. Polen-De , Amanika Kumar
{"title":"对新诊断为种系阴性上皮性卵巢癌的患者实施分步体细胞检测","authors":"Casey L. Lawler ,&nbsp;Sara M. Klennert ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole ,&nbsp;Karen S. Schaepe ,&nbsp;Laura J. Ongie ,&nbsp;Megan E. Grudem ,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Klampe ,&nbsp;Myra J. Wick ,&nbsp;Vonda M. Wall ,&nbsp;Sanjna Rajput ,&nbsp;Clarissa L. Polen-De ,&nbsp;Amanika Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to establish a process for increasing somatic tumor testing for patients with germline BRCA negative advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to gain insight into patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team utilized quality improvement framework to address clinical needs. After implementation of a new somatic testing process, we compared the rates of genetic testing referral, germline testing and somatic testing recommendations between a historic cohort (January 1, 2019-June 20, 2019) and implementation cohort (October 1, 2020 – March 31, 2021). Patients diagnosed with stage III-IV EOC who underwent surgery were included for analysis. To explore patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing results, twenty-three patients in the historic cohort participated in semi-structured interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with advanced stage EOC without a germline BRCA mutation received recommendations for somatic testing 53.5 % (23/43) of the time in the historic cohort. An improvement in the rate of somatic testing recommendations was seen in patients without a germline mutation in the implementation cohort (84.6 % [22/26], P = 0.010). There was no decrease in germline testing after implementation (90 % [63/70] and 96.3 % [52/54,] P = 0.30). Most patients (21/23) in the historic cohort were not aware that both germline and somatic testing were completed for their oncology care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We successfully increased somatic testing recommendations in germline BRCA negative patients prior to completing upfront EOC treatment allowing for a timely, individualized discussion of maintenance PARP inhibitor use. Qualitative assessment of patients’ comprehension of genetic testing for EOC shows a deficit in patient knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101935"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a stepwise process for somatic testing in patients with a new diagnosis of germline negative epithelial ovarian cancer\",\"authors\":\"Casey L. Lawler ,&nbsp;Sara M. Klennert ,&nbsp;Kristin C. Cole ,&nbsp;Karen S. Schaepe ,&nbsp;Laura J. Ongie ,&nbsp;Megan E. Grudem ,&nbsp;Carolyn M. Klampe ,&nbsp;Myra J. Wick ,&nbsp;Vonda M. Wall ,&nbsp;Sanjna Rajput ,&nbsp;Clarissa L. Polen-De ,&nbsp;Amanika Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We sought to establish a process for increasing somatic tumor testing for patients with germline BRCA negative advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to gain insight into patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team utilized quality improvement framework to address clinical needs. After implementation of a new somatic testing process, we compared the rates of genetic testing referral, germline testing and somatic testing recommendations between a historic cohort (January 1, 2019-June 20, 2019) and implementation cohort (October 1, 2020 – March 31, 2021). Patients diagnosed with stage III-IV EOC who underwent surgery were included for analysis. To explore patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing results, twenty-three patients in the historic cohort participated in semi-structured interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients with advanced stage EOC without a germline BRCA mutation received recommendations for somatic testing 53.5 % (23/43) of the time in the historic cohort. An improvement in the rate of somatic testing recommendations was seen in patients without a germline mutation in the implementation cohort (84.6 % [22/26], P = 0.010). There was no decrease in germline testing after implementation (90 % [63/70] and 96.3 % [52/54,] P = 0.30). Most patients (21/23) in the historic cohort were not aware that both germline and somatic testing were completed for their oncology care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>We successfully increased somatic testing recommendations in germline BRCA negative patients prior to completing upfront EOC treatment allowing for a timely, individualized discussion of maintenance PARP inhibitor use. Qualitative assessment of patients’ comprehension of genetic testing for EOC shows a deficit in patient knowledge.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101935\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们试图建立一个增加生殖系BRCA阴性晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者体细胞肿瘤检测的过程,并深入了解患者对其基因检测的理解。方法多学科团队运用质量改进框架解决临床需求。在实施新的体细胞检测流程后,我们比较了历史队列(2019年1月1日- 2019年6月20日)和实施队列(2020年10月1日- 2021年3月31日)之间的基因检测转诊率、种系检测和体细胞检测推荐率。诊断为III-IV期EOC并接受手术的患者纳入分析。为了探索患者对其基因检测结果的理解,历史队列中的23名患者参加了半结构化访谈。在历史队列中,无种系BRCA突变的晚期EOC患者推荐进行体细胞检测的比例为53.5%(23/43)。在实施队列中,无种系突变的患者推荐进行体细胞检测的比率有所提高(84.6% [22/26],P = 0.010)。实施后生殖系检测未见下降(分别为90%[63/70]和96.3% [52/54],P = 0.30)。历史队列中的大多数患者(21/23)不知道在他们的肿瘤治疗中完成了种系和体细胞检测。结论:我们成功地增加了生殖系BRCA阴性患者在完成前期EOC治疗之前的体细胞检测建议,从而及时、个性化地讨论维持PARP抑制剂的使用。对患者对EOC基因检测理解程度的定性评估显示患者知识不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a stepwise process for somatic testing in patients with a new diagnosis of germline negative epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

We sought to establish a process for increasing somatic tumor testing for patients with germline BRCA negative advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and to gain insight into patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team utilized quality improvement framework to address clinical needs. After implementation of a new somatic testing process, we compared the rates of genetic testing referral, germline testing and somatic testing recommendations between a historic cohort (January 1, 2019-June 20, 2019) and implementation cohort (October 1, 2020 – March 31, 2021). Patients diagnosed with stage III-IV EOC who underwent surgery were included for analysis. To explore patients’ comprehension of their genetic testing results, twenty-three patients in the historic cohort participated in semi-structured interviews.

Results

Patients with advanced stage EOC without a germline BRCA mutation received recommendations for somatic testing 53.5 % (23/43) of the time in the historic cohort. An improvement in the rate of somatic testing recommendations was seen in patients without a germline mutation in the implementation cohort (84.6 % [22/26], P = 0.010). There was no decrease in germline testing after implementation (90 % [63/70] and 96.3 % [52/54,] P = 0.30). Most patients (21/23) in the historic cohort were not aware that both germline and somatic testing were completed for their oncology care.

Conclusion

We successfully increased somatic testing recommendations in germline BRCA negative patients prior to completing upfront EOC treatment allowing for a timely, individualized discussion of maintenance PARP inhibitor use. Qualitative assessment of patients’ comprehension of genetic testing for EOC shows a deficit in patient knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信