大规模定制工具包的成功:作为边界条件的产品设计典型性

IF 9.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Michael A. Zaggl , Marc Linzmajer , Gianfranco Walsh , Ronny Reinhardt , Judith Pottbäcker
{"title":"大规模定制工具包的成功:作为边界条件的产品设计典型性","authors":"Michael A. Zaggl ,&nbsp;Marc Linzmajer ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Walsh ,&nbsp;Ronny Reinhardt ,&nbsp;Judith Pottbäcker","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mass customization toolkits are often unsuccessful in inducing purchases of self-designed products. By adopting a user-centric view, the current study proposes that category involvement might function as an antecedent of purchase intentions, mediated by customers’ category–self-connection and moderated by perceived product design typicality. Leveraging attachment and categorization theory, we hypothesize that highly involved users already possess a strong sense of category–self-connection, which interferes with their purchase decisions if self-designed products appear typical of the product category rather than unique. Three studies test this theorizing. Study 1 (field study) demonstrates that category involvement increases actual purchase intentions. Study 2 (experiment) shows that the relationship between category involvement and purchase intentions is mediated by category–self-connection, as well as negatively moderated by perceived product design typicality. Study 3 (field study) corroborates the findings in another context (cars). The combined findings lead to theoretical and practical implications for user toolkits and their design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 115669"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success of mass customization toolkits: Product design typicality as boundary condition\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Zaggl ,&nbsp;Marc Linzmajer ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Walsh ,&nbsp;Ronny Reinhardt ,&nbsp;Judith Pottbäcker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mass customization toolkits are often unsuccessful in inducing purchases of self-designed products. By adopting a user-centric view, the current study proposes that category involvement might function as an antecedent of purchase intentions, mediated by customers’ category–self-connection and moderated by perceived product design typicality. Leveraging attachment and categorization theory, we hypothesize that highly involved users already possess a strong sense of category–self-connection, which interferes with their purchase decisions if self-designed products appear typical of the product category rather than unique. Three studies test this theorizing. Study 1 (field study) demonstrates that category involvement increases actual purchase intentions. Study 2 (experiment) shows that the relationship between category involvement and purchase intentions is mediated by category–self-connection, as well as negatively moderated by perceived product design typicality. Study 3 (field study) corroborates the findings in another context (cars). The combined findings lead to theoretical and practical implications for user toolkits and their design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004928\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325004928","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模定制工具包在诱导购买自行设计的产品方面往往是不成功的。本研究采用以用户为中心的观点,提出品类涉入可能是购买意向的前因式,受顾客品类自我连接的中介作用,并受感知到的产品设计典型性的调节作用。利用依恋和分类理论,我们假设高度参与的用户已经拥有一种强烈的类别自连接感,如果自己设计的产品看起来是产品类别的典型而不是独特的,这就会干扰他们的购买决策。三项研究验证了这一理论。研究1(实地研究)表明品类参与增加了实际购买意愿。研究2(实验)表明,品类涉入与购买意向的关系受品类自连接的中介作用,并受感知到的产品设计典型性的负向调节作用。研究3(实地研究)在另一个环境(汽车)中证实了研究结果。这些综合发现对用户工具包及其设计具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Success of mass customization toolkits: Product design typicality as boundary condition
Mass customization toolkits are often unsuccessful in inducing purchases of self-designed products. By adopting a user-centric view, the current study proposes that category involvement might function as an antecedent of purchase intentions, mediated by customers’ category–self-connection and moderated by perceived product design typicality. Leveraging attachment and categorization theory, we hypothesize that highly involved users already possess a strong sense of category–self-connection, which interferes with their purchase decisions if self-designed products appear typical of the product category rather than unique. Three studies test this theorizing. Study 1 (field study) demonstrates that category involvement increases actual purchase intentions. Study 2 (experiment) shows that the relationship between category involvement and purchase intentions is mediated by category–self-connection, as well as negatively moderated by perceived product design typicality. Study 3 (field study) corroborates the findings in another context (cars). The combined findings lead to theoretical and practical implications for user toolkits and their design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信