Yangdong Zhou, Weijia Guo, Lixin Xing, Jiayang Li, Ning Wang, Ling Meng, Siyu Ye, Xiaohua Yang, Hao Chen and Lei Du
{"title":"质子交换膜燃料电池阴极催化剂的稳定性/耐久性挑战:实验,机制和超越三电极系统的观点","authors":"Yangdong Zhou, Weijia Guo, Lixin Xing, Jiayang Li, Ning Wang, Ling Meng, Siyu Ye, Xiaohua Yang, Hao Chen and Lei Du","doi":"10.1039/D5EE03461B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) determines the performance and lifetime of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Commercialized cathodic ORR catalysts are synthesized using platinum-group-metal (PGM)-based chemicals, which suffer from low geological reserves; hence, PGM-free catalysts are emerging as alternatives. However, PGM and PGM-free catalysts suffer from insufficient stability/durability. The stability/durability test protocols for ORR catalysts, especially for PGM-free catalysts, have not been well agreed—different groups use different stability/durability test protocols in their experiments, particularly in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) tests; some false comparison may be overlooked by researchers. However, a deep understanding of degradation mechanisms and the development of efficient strategies to improve stability/durability have become the research frontier in this field. In this regard, we herein discuss the key experimental factors influencing the accuracy of stability/durability tests in three-electrode systems and MEAs and discuss critical degradation mechanisms and material-based solutions to improve catalyst stability/durability. We hope this discussion will highlight the importance of stability/durability studies and promote PEM fuel cell development.</p>","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":" 20","pages":" 9054-9092"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability/durability challenges of cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells: experiments, mechanisms, and perspectives beyond three-electrode systems\",\"authors\":\"Yangdong Zhou, Weijia Guo, Lixin Xing, Jiayang Li, Ning Wang, Ling Meng, Siyu Ye, Xiaohua Yang, Hao Chen and Lei Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D5EE03461B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) determines the performance and lifetime of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Commercialized cathodic ORR catalysts are synthesized using platinum-group-metal (PGM)-based chemicals, which suffer from low geological reserves; hence, PGM-free catalysts are emerging as alternatives. However, PGM and PGM-free catalysts suffer from insufficient stability/durability. The stability/durability test protocols for ORR catalysts, especially for PGM-free catalysts, have not been well agreed—different groups use different stability/durability test protocols in their experiments, particularly in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) tests; some false comparison may be overlooked by researchers. However, a deep understanding of degradation mechanisms and the development of efficient strategies to improve stability/durability have become the research frontier in this field. In this regard, we herein discuss the key experimental factors influencing the accuracy of stability/durability tests in three-electrode systems and MEAs and discuss critical degradation mechanisms and material-based solutions to improve catalyst stability/durability. We hope this discussion will highlight the importance of stability/durability studies and promote PEM fuel cell development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\" 9054-9092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d5ee03461b\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ee/d5ee03461b","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stability/durability challenges of cathode catalysts for PEM fuel cells: experiments, mechanisms, and perspectives beyond three-electrode systems
The sluggish oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) determines the performance and lifetime of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Commercialized cathodic ORR catalysts are synthesized using platinum-group-metal (PGM)-based chemicals, which suffer from low geological reserves; hence, PGM-free catalysts are emerging as alternatives. However, PGM and PGM-free catalysts suffer from insufficient stability/durability. The stability/durability test protocols for ORR catalysts, especially for PGM-free catalysts, have not been well agreed—different groups use different stability/durability test protocols in their experiments, particularly in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) tests; some false comparison may be overlooked by researchers. However, a deep understanding of degradation mechanisms and the development of efficient strategies to improve stability/durability have become the research frontier in this field. In this regard, we herein discuss the key experimental factors influencing the accuracy of stability/durability tests in three-electrode systems and MEAs and discuss critical degradation mechanisms and material-based solutions to improve catalyst stability/durability. We hope this discussion will highlight the importance of stability/durability studies and promote PEM fuel cell development.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).