使用兴奋剂治疗的注意缺陷/多动障碍患者精神病和双相情感障碍的发生

IF 17.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Claudia Aymerich, Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Marco Solmi, Javier Torres-Cortes, Nessma Abdelhafez, Ana Catalan, Olivier Corbeil, Nicoletta Adamo, Philip Shaw, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Samuele Cortese
{"title":"使用兴奋剂治疗的注意缺陷/多动障碍患者精神病和双相情感障碍的发生","authors":"Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Claudia Aymerich, Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Marco Solmi, Javier Torres-Cortes, Nessma Abdelhafez, Ana Catalan, Olivier Corbeil, Nicoletta Adamo, Philip Shaw, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Samuele Cortese","doi":"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceIndividuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may present with psychosis or bipolar disorder (BD) following treatment with stimulants. The extent to which this occurs is currently unclear.ObjectiveTo meta-analytically quantify the occurrence of psychosis or BD after exposure to stimulants in individuals with ADHD and assess possible moderating factors.Data SourcesPubMed, Web of Science, Ovid/PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Reviews were searched from inception until October 1, 2024, without language restrictions.Study SelectionStudies of any design with <jats:italic>DSM</jats:italic> or <jats:italic>International Classification of Diseases</jats:italic>–defined ADHD populations exposed to stimulants, where psychosis or BD outcomes were evaluated.Data Extraction and SynthesisPRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and MOOSE Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed, the protocol was registered, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool were used for quality appraisal. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFor the proportion of individuals developing psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, and BD, effect sizes are reported as percentages with 95% CIs. For the comparison between amphetamines and methylphenidate, effect sizes are presented as odds ratios with 95% CIs.ResultsSixteen studies (N = 391 043; mean [range] age, 12.6 [8.5-31.1] years; 288 199 [73.7%] male) were eligible. Among individuals with ADHD prescribed stimulants, 2.76% (95% CI, 0.73-9.88; k = 10; n = 237 035), 2.29% (95% CI, 1.52-3.40; k = 4; n = 91 437), and 3.72% (95% CI, 0.77-16.05; k = 4; n = 92 945) developed psychotic symptoms, a psychotic disorder, and BD, respectively. Heterogeneity across the studies was significant (<jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> &amp;amp;gt; 95%). Psychosis occurrence risk was significantly higher in individuals exposed to amphetamines than to methylphenidate (odds ratio [OR], 1.57, 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; k = 3, n = 231 325). Subgroup analyses showed significantly higher prevalence of psychotic symptoms in studies from North America and in those with longer follow-up periods. Increased psychosis occurrence was associated with a higher proportion of female participants, smaller sample sizes, and higher dose of stimulants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis found a nonnegligible occurrence of psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, or BD in individuals with ADHD treated with stimulants. Amphetamines were associated with higher occurrence compared to methylphenidate. The included studies cannot establish causality, highlighting the need for further research, including randomized clinical trials and mirror-image studies comparing individuals exposed and not exposed to stimulants. Nonetheless, clinicians should inform patients about the increased occurrence of psychosis or BD when discussing stimulant pharmacotherapy and systematically monitor for these conditions throughout treatment.","PeriodicalId":14800,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Psychiatry","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence of Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder in Individuals With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treated With Stimulants\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo, Claudia Aymerich, Juan Pablo Chart-Pascual, Marco Solmi, Javier Torres-Cortes, Nessma Abdelhafez, Ana Catalan, Olivier Corbeil, Nicoletta Adamo, Philip Shaw, Paolo Fusar-Poli, Samuele Cortese\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceIndividuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may present with psychosis or bipolar disorder (BD) following treatment with stimulants. The extent to which this occurs is currently unclear.ObjectiveTo meta-analytically quantify the occurrence of psychosis or BD after exposure to stimulants in individuals with ADHD and assess possible moderating factors.Data SourcesPubMed, Web of Science, Ovid/PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Reviews were searched from inception until October 1, 2024, without language restrictions.Study SelectionStudies of any design with <jats:italic>DSM</jats:italic> or <jats:italic>International Classification of Diseases</jats:italic>–defined ADHD populations exposed to stimulants, where psychosis or BD outcomes were evaluated.Data Extraction and SynthesisPRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and MOOSE Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed, the protocol was registered, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool were used for quality appraisal. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFor the proportion of individuals developing psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, and BD, effect sizes are reported as percentages with 95% CIs. For the comparison between amphetamines and methylphenidate, effect sizes are presented as odds ratios with 95% CIs.ResultsSixteen studies (N = 391 043; mean [range] age, 12.6 [8.5-31.1] years; 288 199 [73.7%] male) were eligible. Among individuals with ADHD prescribed stimulants, 2.76% (95% CI, 0.73-9.88; k = 10; n = 237 035), 2.29% (95% CI, 1.52-3.40; k = 4; n = 91 437), and 3.72% (95% CI, 0.77-16.05; k = 4; n = 92 945) developed psychotic symptoms, a psychotic disorder, and BD, respectively. Heterogeneity across the studies was significant (<jats:italic>I</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> &amp;amp;gt; 95%). Psychosis occurrence risk was significantly higher in individuals exposed to amphetamines than to methylphenidate (odds ratio [OR], 1.57, 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; k = 3, n = 231 325). Subgroup analyses showed significantly higher prevalence of psychotic symptoms in studies from North America and in those with longer follow-up periods. Increased psychosis occurrence was associated with a higher proportion of female participants, smaller sample sizes, and higher dose of stimulants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis found a nonnegligible occurrence of psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, or BD in individuals with ADHD treated with stimulants. Amphetamines were associated with higher occurrence compared to methylphenidate. The included studies cannot establish causality, highlighting the need for further research, including randomized clinical trials and mirror-image studies comparing individuals exposed and not exposed to stimulants. Nonetheless, clinicians should inform patients about the increased occurrence of psychosis or BD when discussing stimulant pharmacotherapy and systematically monitor for these conditions throughout treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":17.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2311\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.2311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)患者在使用兴奋剂治疗后可能会出现精神病或双相情感障碍(BD)。这种情况发生的程度目前尚不清楚。目的荟萃分析量化ADHD患者暴露于兴奋剂后精神病或双相障碍的发生率,并评估可能的调节因素。数据来源:pubmed、Web of Science、Ovid/PsycINFO和Cochrane Central Register of Reviews从研究开始到2024年10月1日,没有语言限制。研究选择任何设计的DSM或国际疾病分类定义的ADHD人群暴露于兴奋剂的研究,其中评估精神病或双相障碍的结果。数据提取与综合遵循prisma系统评价优选报告项目和流行病学指南中观察性研究的荟萃分析和MOOSE荟萃分析,对方案进行注册,并使用Newcastle-Ottawa量表和Cochrane偏倚风险2工具进行质量评价。进行随机效应荟萃分析、亚组分析和元回归分析。对于出现精神病症状、精神病障碍和双相障碍的个体比例,效应量以95% ci的百分比报告。对于安非他明和哌甲酯的比较,效应量以95% ci的优势比表示。结果纳入16项研究(N = 391 043例,平均年龄12.6[8.5 ~ 31.1]岁,男性288 199例,占73.7%)。在服用兴奋剂的ADHD患者中,分别有2.76% (95% CI, 0.73-9.88; k = 10; n = 237 035)、2.29% (95% CI, 1.52-3.40; k = 4; n = 91 437)和3.72% (95% CI, 0.77-16.05; k = 4; n = 92 945)出现精神病性症状、精神病性障碍和双相障碍。研究间的异质性显著(I2 &gt; 95%)。暴露于安非他明的个体发生精神病的风险显著高于暴露于哌甲酯的个体(优势比[OR], 1.57, 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; k = 3, n = 23325)。亚组分析显示,在北美和随访时间较长的研究中,精神病症状的患病率明显较高。精神病发生率的增加与女性参与者比例较高、样本量较小和兴奋剂剂量较高有关。结论和相关性:本系统综述和荟萃分析发现,在接受兴奋剂治疗的ADHD患者中,精神病性症状、精神病性障碍或双相障碍的发生率不可忽视。与哌甲酯相比,安非他明的发生率更高。纳入的研究不能确定因果关系,强调需要进一步的研究,包括随机临床试验和镜像研究,比较暴露于兴奋剂和未暴露于兴奋剂的个体。尽管如此,临床医生在讨论兴奋剂药物治疗时应告知患者精神病或双相障碍发生率的增加,并在整个治疗过程中系统地监测这些情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occurrence of Psychosis and Bipolar Disorder in Individuals With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treated With Stimulants
ImportanceIndividuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) may present with psychosis or bipolar disorder (BD) following treatment with stimulants. The extent to which this occurs is currently unclear.ObjectiveTo meta-analytically quantify the occurrence of psychosis or BD after exposure to stimulants in individuals with ADHD and assess possible moderating factors.Data SourcesPubMed, Web of Science, Ovid/PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Reviews were searched from inception until October 1, 2024, without language restrictions.Study SelectionStudies of any design with DSM or International Classification of Diseases–defined ADHD populations exposed to stimulants, where psychosis or BD outcomes were evaluated.Data Extraction and SynthesisPRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and MOOSE Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed, the protocol was registered, and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool were used for quality appraisal. Random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions were conducted.Main Outcomes and MeasuresFor the proportion of individuals developing psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, and BD, effect sizes are reported as percentages with 95% CIs. For the comparison between amphetamines and methylphenidate, effect sizes are presented as odds ratios with 95% CIs.ResultsSixteen studies (N = 391 043; mean [range] age, 12.6 [8.5-31.1] years; 288 199 [73.7%] male) were eligible. Among individuals with ADHD prescribed stimulants, 2.76% (95% CI, 0.73-9.88; k = 10; n = 237 035), 2.29% (95% CI, 1.52-3.40; k = 4; n = 91 437), and 3.72% (95% CI, 0.77-16.05; k = 4; n = 92 945) developed psychotic symptoms, a psychotic disorder, and BD, respectively. Heterogeneity across the studies was significant (I2 &amp;gt; 95%). Psychosis occurrence risk was significantly higher in individuals exposed to amphetamines than to methylphenidate (odds ratio [OR], 1.57, 95% CI, 1.15-2.16; k = 3, n = 231 325). Subgroup analyses showed significantly higher prevalence of psychotic symptoms in studies from North America and in those with longer follow-up periods. Increased psychosis occurrence was associated with a higher proportion of female participants, smaller sample sizes, and higher dose of stimulants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review and meta-analysis found a nonnegligible occurrence of psychotic symptoms, psychotic disorders, or BD in individuals with ADHD treated with stimulants. Amphetamines were associated with higher occurrence compared to methylphenidate. The included studies cannot establish causality, highlighting the need for further research, including randomized clinical trials and mirror-image studies comparing individuals exposed and not exposed to stimulants. Nonetheless, clinicians should inform patients about the increased occurrence of psychosis or BD when discussing stimulant pharmacotherapy and systematically monitor for these conditions throughout treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Psychiatry
JAMA Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
233
期刊介绍: JAMA Psychiatry is a global, peer-reviewed journal catering to clinicians, scholars, and research scientists in psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and related fields. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry originated in 1919, splitting into two journals in 1959: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, these evolved into JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Psychiatry is affiliated with the JAMA Network, a group of peer-reviewed medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信