半干旱条件下补灌条件下面包小麦产量、品质及水分生产力评价

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Mehmet Ali Dündar, Ramazan Topak
{"title":"半干旱条件下补灌条件下面包小麦产量、品质及水分生产力评价","authors":"Mehmet Ali Dündar, Ramazan Topak","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07790-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and aims</h3><p>Water shortage is the main restricting factor for winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) production, whereas irrigation is the most effective measure to reduce water stress and increase winter wheat grain yield. However, irrigation strategies with high grain yield and water productivity (WP) are needed under scarce-water resources conditions such as the Konya Plain.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>For this purpose, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different supplemental irrigation strategies on grain yield, quality and irrigation water productivity (IWP) of bread wheat in the Konya Plain of Türkiye. The supplemental irrigation strategies were irrigation during jointing (J), irrigation during jointing and heading (JH), irrigation during jointing, heading and milking (JHM). These strategies were tested under four different irrigation levels such as full, 90, 70 and 50 mm, and a no irrigation (rainfed) treatment was added as control.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The results of this research revailed that the highest grain yields were obtained under JHM<sub>50</sub>, JHM<sub>70</sub>, JHM<sub>90</sub> and JHM<sub>F</sub> treatments, and among the JHM<sub>70</sub>, JHM<sub>90,</sub> and JHM<sub>F</sub> irrigation treatments, there were no significant differences in grain yield. Moreover, JHM<sub>70</sub> treatment saved 34.6% (110 mm) and 22.2% (60 mm) of total irrigation water, respectively, compared to JHM<sub>F</sub> and JHM<sub>90</sub> treatments. The two-year average WP and IWP of JHM<sub>70</sub>-treated bread wheat increased by 19.8% and 43.8% respectively, compared with JHM<sub>F</sub>. The study findings showed that as irrigation frequency increased, grain quality factors relatively decreased, and the highest grain quality factors were achieved under R<sub>f</sub> treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, JHM could be suggested to obtain high grain yield, WP, IWP, and water saving under normal years in Konya Plain. On the other hand, JHM treatment saved 28.6% of irrigation water with only about 4.8% grain yield loss as compared to JHM . Therefore, JHM can be suggested as an alternative irrigation treatment for stable winter wheat production with limited water resources in the Konya Plain.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"476 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of yield, quality and water productivity of bread wheat cultivated under supplemental irrigation strategies in semi-arid conditions\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Ali Dündar, Ramazan Topak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11104-025-07790-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and aims</h3><p>Water shortage is the main restricting factor for winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) production, whereas irrigation is the most effective measure to reduce water stress and increase winter wheat grain yield. However, irrigation strategies with high grain yield and water productivity (WP) are needed under scarce-water resources conditions such as the Konya Plain.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>For this purpose, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different supplemental irrigation strategies on grain yield, quality and irrigation water productivity (IWP) of bread wheat in the Konya Plain of Türkiye. The supplemental irrigation strategies were irrigation during jointing (J), irrigation during jointing and heading (JH), irrigation during jointing, heading and milking (JHM). These strategies were tested under four different irrigation levels such as full, 90, 70 and 50 mm, and a no irrigation (rainfed) treatment was added as control.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>The results of this research revailed that the highest grain yields were obtained under JHM<sub>50</sub>, JHM<sub>70</sub>, JHM<sub>90</sub> and JHM<sub>F</sub> treatments, and among the JHM<sub>70</sub>, JHM<sub>90,</sub> and JHM<sub>F</sub> irrigation treatments, there were no significant differences in grain yield. Moreover, JHM<sub>70</sub> treatment saved 34.6% (110 mm) and 22.2% (60 mm) of total irrigation water, respectively, compared to JHM<sub>F</sub> and JHM<sub>90</sub> treatments. The two-year average WP and IWP of JHM<sub>70</sub>-treated bread wheat increased by 19.8% and 43.8% respectively, compared with JHM<sub>F</sub>. The study findings showed that as irrigation frequency increased, grain quality factors relatively decreased, and the highest grain quality factors were achieved under R<sub>f</sub> treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, JHM could be suggested to obtain high grain yield, WP, IWP, and water saving under normal years in Konya Plain. On the other hand, JHM treatment saved 28.6% of irrigation water with only about 4.8% grain yield loss as compared to JHM . Therefore, JHM can be suggested as an alternative irrigation treatment for stable winter wheat production with limited water resources in the Konya Plain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"volume\":\"476 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant and Soil\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07790-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07790-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的水资源短缺是制约冬小麦生产的主要因素,而灌溉是缓解水分胁迫、提高冬小麦产量的最有效措施。然而,在科尼亚平原等水资源稀缺的条件下,需要具有高产量和水生产力的灌溉策略。方法通过田间试验,研究了不同补灌方式对基耶省科尼亚平原面包小麦产量、品质和灌溉水分生产力的影响。补充灌溉策略为拔节期灌溉(J)、拔节抽穗期灌溉(JH)、拔节抽穗挤奶期灌溉(JHM)。在满、90、70和50毫米四种不同灌溉水平下对这些策略进行了试验,并添加了不灌溉(雨养)处理作为对照。结果JHM50、JHM70、JHM90和JHMF处理籽粒产量最高,JHM70、JHM90和JHMF灌溉处理籽粒产量差异不显著。与JHMF和JHM90处理相比,JHM70处理分别节约灌溉总水量34.6% (110 mm)和22.2% (60 mm)。与JHMF相比,jhm70处理的面包小麦2年平均WP和IWP分别提高了19.8%和43.8%。研究结果表明:随着灌水频率的增加,籽粒品质因子相对降低,其中Rf处理籽粒品质因子最高;结论在科尼亚平原正常年份,JHM可获得较高的粮食产量、WP、IWP和节水效果。另一方面,与JHM相比,JHM处理节约了28.6%的灌溉水,而产量损失仅为4.8%左右。因此,在科尼亚平原水资源有限的条件下,JHM可作为冬小麦稳定生产的替代灌溉处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of yield, quality and water productivity of bread wheat cultivated under supplemental irrigation strategies in semi-arid conditions

Background and aims

Water shortage is the main restricting factor for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production, whereas irrigation is the most effective measure to reduce water stress and increase winter wheat grain yield. However, irrigation strategies with high grain yield and water productivity (WP) are needed under scarce-water resources conditions such as the Konya Plain.

Methods

For this purpose, a field experiment was carried out to determine the effects of different supplemental irrigation strategies on grain yield, quality and irrigation water productivity (IWP) of bread wheat in the Konya Plain of Türkiye. The supplemental irrigation strategies were irrigation during jointing (J), irrigation during jointing and heading (JH), irrigation during jointing, heading and milking (JHM). These strategies were tested under four different irrigation levels such as full, 90, 70 and 50 mm, and a no irrigation (rainfed) treatment was added as control.

Results

The results of this research revailed that the highest grain yields were obtained under JHM50, JHM70, JHM90 and JHMF treatments, and among the JHM70, JHM90, and JHMF irrigation treatments, there were no significant differences in grain yield. Moreover, JHM70 treatment saved 34.6% (110 mm) and 22.2% (60 mm) of total irrigation water, respectively, compared to JHMF and JHM90 treatments. The two-year average WP and IWP of JHM70-treated bread wheat increased by 19.8% and 43.8% respectively, compared with JHMF. The study findings showed that as irrigation frequency increased, grain quality factors relatively decreased, and the highest grain quality factors were achieved under Rf treatment.

Conclusions

In conclusion, JHM could be suggested to obtain high grain yield, WP, IWP, and water saving under normal years in Konya Plain. On the other hand, JHM treatment saved 28.6% of irrigation water with only about 4.8% grain yield loss as compared to JHM . Therefore, JHM can be suggested as an alternative irrigation treatment for stable winter wheat production with limited water resources in the Konya Plain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信