在社区居住的老年人中进行挑衅性测试:确定身体恢复能力的途径

Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, Saurav Saha, Zhuo Tang, Angela Van Sciver, Cedric Lee Treadway, Owen Paul Treanor, Nikhil Satchidanand, Bruce Robert Troen
{"title":"在社区居住的老年人中进行挑衅性测试:确定身体恢复能力的途径","authors":"Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, Saurav Saha, Zhuo Tang, Angela Van Sciver, Cedric Lee Treadway, Owen Paul Treanor, Nikhil Satchidanand, Bruce Robert Troen","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Resilience is the capacity of an organism to both resist and recover from stressors, and its decline can be an early indicator of susceptibility that precedes frailty, disability, and death. This study explores the use of provocative tests—time-based responses to non-harmful challenges—as potential indicators of resilience. Methods Provocative tests were performed in 50 community-dwelling adults (24 men, 26 women), aged 23–82 years and included cognitive challenges, strength and heart rate recovery after exercise, cold exposure, blood occlusion, and resistance to balance perturbations. Results Age was associated with declines in recovery from cold-water hand immersion (r2 = 0.18, p = 0.002) and upper-arm blood occlusion (r2 = 0.11, p = 0.023). Susceptibility to balance perturbations also increased with age (r2 = 0.10, p = 0.025). Notably, heart rate and strength recovery post-exercise did not correlate with age, although older participants walked shorter distances (r2 = 0.54, p < 0.0001) and curled less weight (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0003). Cognitive performance in the Stroop Color and Word test was unaffected by exercise but did show age-related declines (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.0001). A composite resilience score derived from the measures inversely associated with age (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0027). Additionally, responses to cold-water immersion and blood occlusion correlated in older adults (r2 = 0.31, p = 0.002, N = 18), suggesting interrelated physiological responses. Conclusions These findings support provocative testing to identify early signs of declining resilience and guide interventions targeting age-related vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Provocative testing in community dwelling older adults: a path to identify physical resilience\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Ladd Seldeen, Saurav Saha, Zhuo Tang, Angela Van Sciver, Cedric Lee Treadway, Owen Paul Treanor, Nikhil Satchidanand, Bruce Robert Troen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Resilience is the capacity of an organism to both resist and recover from stressors, and its decline can be an early indicator of susceptibility that precedes frailty, disability, and death. This study explores the use of provocative tests—time-based responses to non-harmful challenges—as potential indicators of resilience. Methods Provocative tests were performed in 50 community-dwelling adults (24 men, 26 women), aged 23–82 years and included cognitive challenges, strength and heart rate recovery after exercise, cold exposure, blood occlusion, and resistance to balance perturbations. Results Age was associated with declines in recovery from cold-water hand immersion (r2 = 0.18, p = 0.002) and upper-arm blood occlusion (r2 = 0.11, p = 0.023). Susceptibility to balance perturbations also increased with age (r2 = 0.10, p = 0.025). Notably, heart rate and strength recovery post-exercise did not correlate with age, although older participants walked shorter distances (r2 = 0.54, p < 0.0001) and curled less weight (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0003). Cognitive performance in the Stroop Color and Word test was unaffected by exercise but did show age-related declines (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.0001). A composite resilience score derived from the measures inversely associated with age (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0027). Additionally, responses to cold-water immersion and blood occlusion correlated in older adults (r2 = 0.31, p = 0.002, N = 18), suggesting interrelated physiological responses. Conclusions These findings support provocative testing to identify early signs of declining resilience and guide interventions targeting age-related vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复原力是生物体抵抗压力并从压力中恢复的能力,它的下降可以是脆弱、残疾和死亡之前的易感性的早期指标。本研究探讨了挑衅测试的使用-对无害挑战的基于时间的反应-作为弹性的潜在指标。方法对50名年龄在23-82岁的社区居民(24男,26女)进行挑衅试验,包括认知挑战、运动后力量和心率恢复、寒冷暴露、血液闭塞和对平衡扰动的抵抗力。结果年龄与手部冷水浸泡(r2 = 0.18, p = 0.002)和上臂血闭塞(r2 = 0.11, p = 0.023)后恢复能力下降有关。对平衡扰动的易感性也随着年龄的增长而增加(r2 = 0.10, p = 0.025)。值得注意的是,运动后心率和力量恢复与年龄无关,尽管老年参与者步行距离较短(r2 = 0.54, p < 0.0001),卷曲重量较少(r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0003)。Stroop Color and Word测试中的认知表现不受运动影响,但确实显示出与年龄相关的下降(r2 = 0.53, p < 0.0001)。综合弹性评分与年龄呈负相关(r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0027)。此外,老年人对冷水浸泡和血液闭塞的反应相关(r2 = 0.31, p = 0.002, N = 18),表明相关的生理反应。这些发现支持挑衅性测试,以识别恢复力下降的早期迹象,并指导针对年龄相关脆弱性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Provocative testing in community dwelling older adults: a path to identify physical resilience
Background Resilience is the capacity of an organism to both resist and recover from stressors, and its decline can be an early indicator of susceptibility that precedes frailty, disability, and death. This study explores the use of provocative tests—time-based responses to non-harmful challenges—as potential indicators of resilience. Methods Provocative tests were performed in 50 community-dwelling adults (24 men, 26 women), aged 23–82 years and included cognitive challenges, strength and heart rate recovery after exercise, cold exposure, blood occlusion, and resistance to balance perturbations. Results Age was associated with declines in recovery from cold-water hand immersion (r2 = 0.18, p = 0.002) and upper-arm blood occlusion (r2 = 0.11, p = 0.023). Susceptibility to balance perturbations also increased with age (r2 = 0.10, p = 0.025). Notably, heart rate and strength recovery post-exercise did not correlate with age, although older participants walked shorter distances (r2 = 0.54, p &lt; 0.0001) and curled less weight (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0003). Cognitive performance in the Stroop Color and Word test was unaffected by exercise but did show age-related declines (r2 = 0.53, p &lt; 0.0001). A composite resilience score derived from the measures inversely associated with age (r2 = 0.17, p = 0.0027). Additionally, responses to cold-water immersion and blood occlusion correlated in older adults (r2 = 0.31, p = 0.002, N = 18), suggesting interrelated physiological responses. Conclusions These findings support provocative testing to identify early signs of declining resilience and guide interventions targeting age-related vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信