放射组学质量评分2.0:面向个性化医疗的放射组学准备水平和临床翻译

IF 82.2 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Shruti Atul Mali, Xian Zhong, Sheng Kuang, Elizaveta Lavrova, Hamza Khan, Karim Lekadir, Alex Zwanenburg, Joseph Deasy, Maciej Bobowicz, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Andrew Maidment, Michel Dumontier, Paul E. Kinahan, J. Martijn Nobel, Sina Amirrajab, Zohaib Salahuddin
{"title":"放射组学质量评分2.0:面向个性化医疗的放射组学准备水平和临床翻译","authors":"Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Shruti Atul Mali, Xian Zhong, Sheng Kuang, Elizaveta Lavrova, Hamza Khan, Karim Lekadir, Alex Zwanenburg, Joseph Deasy, Maciej Bobowicz, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Andrew Maidment, Michel Dumontier, Paul E. Kinahan, J. Martijn Nobel, Sina Amirrajab, Zohaib Salahuddin","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiomics is a tool for medical imaging analysis that could have a relevant role in precision oncology by offering precise quantitative support for clinical decision-making. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) is a tool developed to assess the rigour of radiomics studies that has now been widely adopted by researchers. Although RQS version 1.0 established a benchmark, an updated framework is required to account for evolving knowledge and ensure optimal evaluation of the quality of radiomics studies through the inclusion of fairness, explainability, rigorous quality control and harmonization. In this Review, we introduce the updated RQS 2.0, which maintains the scientific rigour of its predecessor and addresses these contemporary needs, and therefore could potentially accelerate clinical translation. Moreover, we introduce the radiomics readiness levels, inspired by the technology readiness level framework, which are integrated in RQS 2.0 and reflect nine distinct levels of incremental improvement in radiomics research with the ultimate aim of clinical implementation. We also detail anticipated future directions in radiomics, outlining a strategic vision to advance precision oncology, which is the ultimate aim of RQS 2.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: towards radiomics readiness levels and clinical translation for personalized medicine\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Shruti Atul Mali, Xian Zhong, Sheng Kuang, Elizaveta Lavrova, Hamza Khan, Karim Lekadir, Alex Zwanenburg, Joseph Deasy, Maciej Bobowicz, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Andrew Maidment, Michel Dumontier, Paul E. Kinahan, J. Martijn Nobel, Sina Amirrajab, Zohaib Salahuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Radiomics is a tool for medical imaging analysis that could have a relevant role in precision oncology by offering precise quantitative support for clinical decision-making. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) is a tool developed to assess the rigour of radiomics studies that has now been widely adopted by researchers. Although RQS version 1.0 established a benchmark, an updated framework is required to account for evolving knowledge and ensure optimal evaluation of the quality of radiomics studies through the inclusion of fairness, explainability, rigorous quality control and harmonization. In this Review, we introduce the updated RQS 2.0, which maintains the scientific rigour of its predecessor and addresses these contemporary needs, and therefore could potentially accelerate clinical translation. Moreover, we introduce the radiomics readiness levels, inspired by the technology readiness level framework, which are integrated in RQS 2.0 and reflect nine distinct levels of incremental improvement in radiomics research with the ultimate aim of clinical implementation. We also detail anticipated future directions in radiomics, outlining a strategic vision to advance precision oncology, which is the ultimate aim of RQS 2.0.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":82.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射组学是一种医学影像分析工具,通过为临床决策提供精确的定量支持,可以在精确肿瘤学中发挥相关作用。放射组学质量评分(RQS)是一种评估放射组学研究严谨性的工具,目前已被研究人员广泛采用。尽管RQS 1.0版建立了一个基准,但需要一个更新的框架来考虑不断发展的知识,并通过包括公平性、可解释性、严格的质量控制和协调来确保对放射组学研究质量的最佳评估。在这篇综述中,我们介绍了更新后的RQS 2.0,它保持了其前身的科学严谨性,并解决了这些当代需求,因此可能会加速临床翻译。此外,我们引入放射组学准备水平,受技术准备水平框架的启发,集成在RQS 2.0中,反映了放射组学研究的九个不同水平的增量改进,最终目的是临床实施。我们还详细介绍了放射组学的未来发展方向,概述了推进精确肿瘤学的战略愿景,这是RQS 2.0的最终目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: towards radiomics readiness levels and clinical translation for personalized medicine

Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: towards radiomics readiness levels and clinical translation for personalized medicine

Radiomics is a tool for medical imaging analysis that could have a relevant role in precision oncology by offering precise quantitative support for clinical decision-making. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) is a tool developed to assess the rigour of radiomics studies that has now been widely adopted by researchers. Although RQS version 1.0 established a benchmark, an updated framework is required to account for evolving knowledge and ensure optimal evaluation of the quality of radiomics studies through the inclusion of fairness, explainability, rigorous quality control and harmonization. In this Review, we introduce the updated RQS 2.0, which maintains the scientific rigour of its predecessor and addresses these contemporary needs, and therefore could potentially accelerate clinical translation. Moreover, we introduce the radiomics readiness levels, inspired by the technology readiness level framework, which are integrated in RQS 2.0 and reflect nine distinct levels of incremental improvement in radiomics research with the ultimate aim of clinical implementation. We also detail anticipated future directions in radiomics, outlining a strategic vision to advance precision oncology, which is the ultimate aim of RQS 2.0.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
99.40
自引率
0.40%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信