{"title":"非财务利益冲突","authors":"Saroj Niraula, Ian F. Tannock","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01073-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some of the most consequential conflicts in oncology and medicine overall are not financial; these remain poorly defined and weakly regulated. Here we offer a policy-relevant definition and examine how reputation, ambition, ideology and institutional loyalty can shape research, guidelines, policy and hiring decisions. We argue for structural safeguards to preserve trust in medicine.","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-financial conflicts of interest\",\"authors\":\"Saroj Niraula, Ian F. Tannock\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41571-025-01073-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some of the most consequential conflicts in oncology and medicine overall are not financial; these remain poorly defined and weakly regulated. Here we offer a policy-relevant definition and examine how reputation, ambition, ideology and institutional loyalty can shape research, guidelines, policy and hiring decisions. We argue for structural safeguards to preserve trust in medicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":82.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01073-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01073-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some of the most consequential conflicts in oncology and medicine overall are not financial; these remain poorly defined and weakly regulated. Here we offer a policy-relevant definition and examine how reputation, ambition, ideology and institutional loyalty can shape research, guidelines, policy and hiring decisions. We argue for structural safeguards to preserve trust in medicine.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.