我的城市还是我的星球?重新思考欧盟对地球遗产和地球归属感的文化政策

IF 4.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Ana Aceska
{"title":"我的城市还是我的星球?重新思考欧盟对地球遗产和地球归属感的文化政策","authors":"Ana Aceska","doi":"10.1177/00420980251359563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planetary senses of belonging are important as humanity is facing planetary threats, such as the climate crisis, biodiversity loss, pandemic risks, and growing economic and social disparities. This paper argues that the cultural and heritage policies and agendas of cities, nation-states, and international political actors can do more to address these threats than merely preserving and managing heritage. Instead, they should steer heritage-making toward planetary heritage and fostering planetary senses of belonging among people. Numerous scholars have highlighted the significant role of planetary imaginations in contemporary efforts to tackle global challenges, and critical heritage scholarship has developed new heritage paradigms that incorporate planetary imaginations. Given the absence of ideological contexts in which planetary heritage can flourish, heritage scholars and practitioners need hands-on solutions to put these paradigms into practice. Focusing on the European Union’s cultural policy as an illustrative example, this paper proposes a solution for steering heritage toward the planetary: to approach cultural policies and heritage initiatives as policy assemblages made of discourses, bureaucratic mechanisms, and actors and to combine critical perspectives from urban and heritage studies, policy assemblage approaches, and planetary discourses to reformulate those assemblages toward producing planetary heritage and planetary senses of belonging. The city serves not only as a site for heritage and heritage-led tourism, but its governance structures, policies, and planning practices also shape and are shaped by heritage policies and identity narratives. Any effort to apply planetary imaginations in heritage practice must be done with cities in mind.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"My city or my planet? Rethinking the EU cultural policy toward planetary heritage and planetary senses of belonging\",\"authors\":\"Ana Aceska\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00420980251359563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Planetary senses of belonging are important as humanity is facing planetary threats, such as the climate crisis, biodiversity loss, pandemic risks, and growing economic and social disparities. This paper argues that the cultural and heritage policies and agendas of cities, nation-states, and international political actors can do more to address these threats than merely preserving and managing heritage. Instead, they should steer heritage-making toward planetary heritage and fostering planetary senses of belonging among people. Numerous scholars have highlighted the significant role of planetary imaginations in contemporary efforts to tackle global challenges, and critical heritage scholarship has developed new heritage paradigms that incorporate planetary imaginations. Given the absence of ideological contexts in which planetary heritage can flourish, heritage scholars and practitioners need hands-on solutions to put these paradigms into practice. Focusing on the European Union’s cultural policy as an illustrative example, this paper proposes a solution for steering heritage toward the planetary: to approach cultural policies and heritage initiatives as policy assemblages made of discourses, bureaucratic mechanisms, and actors and to combine critical perspectives from urban and heritage studies, policy assemblage approaches, and planetary discourses to reformulate those assemblages toward producing planetary heritage and planetary senses of belonging. The city serves not only as a site for heritage and heritage-led tourism, but its governance structures, policies, and planning practices also shape and are shaped by heritage policies and identity narratives. Any effort to apply planetary imaginations in heritage practice must be done with cities in mind.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Studies\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251359563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251359563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于人类正面临气候危机、生物多样性丧失、大流行病风险以及日益扩大的经济和社会差距等全球性威胁,地球归属感非常重要。本文认为,城市、民族国家和国际政治参与者的文化和遗产政策和议程可以做更多的事情来应对这些威胁,而不仅仅是保护和管理遗产。相反,他们应该把遗产的制作转向地球遗产,培养人们对地球的归属感。许多学者强调了行星想象在当代应对全球挑战的努力中的重要作用,批判性遗产研究已经发展出新的遗产范式,其中包括行星想象。由于缺乏地球遗产可以蓬勃发展的意识形态背景,遗产学者和从业者需要实际的解决方案来将这些范式付诸实践。本文以欧盟的文化政策为例,提出了将遗产转向地球的解决方案:将文化政策和遗产倡议视为由话语、官僚机制和行动者组成的政策组合,并将来自城市和遗产研究、政策组合方法和行星话语的批判性观点结合起来,重新制定这些组合,以产生行星遗产和行星归属感。这座城市不仅是遗产和以遗产为主导的旅游场所,而且其治理结构、政策和规划实践也塑造了遗产政策和身份叙事,并被其塑造。任何将行星想象应用于遗产实践的努力都必须考虑到城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
My city or my planet? Rethinking the EU cultural policy toward planetary heritage and planetary senses of belonging
Planetary senses of belonging are important as humanity is facing planetary threats, such as the climate crisis, biodiversity loss, pandemic risks, and growing economic and social disparities. This paper argues that the cultural and heritage policies and agendas of cities, nation-states, and international political actors can do more to address these threats than merely preserving and managing heritage. Instead, they should steer heritage-making toward planetary heritage and fostering planetary senses of belonging among people. Numerous scholars have highlighted the significant role of planetary imaginations in contemporary efforts to tackle global challenges, and critical heritage scholarship has developed new heritage paradigms that incorporate planetary imaginations. Given the absence of ideological contexts in which planetary heritage can flourish, heritage scholars and practitioners need hands-on solutions to put these paradigms into practice. Focusing on the European Union’s cultural policy as an illustrative example, this paper proposes a solution for steering heritage toward the planetary: to approach cultural policies and heritage initiatives as policy assemblages made of discourses, bureaucratic mechanisms, and actors and to combine critical perspectives from urban and heritage studies, policy assemblage approaches, and planetary discourses to reformulate those assemblages toward producing planetary heritage and planetary senses of belonging. The city serves not only as a site for heritage and heritage-led tourism, but its governance structures, policies, and planning practices also shape and are shaped by heritage policies and identity narratives. Any effort to apply planetary imaginations in heritage practice must be done with cities in mind.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信