贝洛奥里藏特(巴西)和波哥大(哥伦比亚)城市中心的流动性实践和社会建设

IF 4.1 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Eugênia Viana Cerqueira, Ana Marcela Ardila Pinto, Natalia Villamizar-Duarte, Daniela Antunes Lessa, César A. Ruiz
{"title":"贝洛奥里藏特(巴西)和波哥大<e:1>(哥伦比亚)城市中心的流动性实践和社会建设","authors":"Eugênia Viana Cerqueira, Ana Marcela Ardila Pinto, Natalia Villamizar-Duarte, Daniela Antunes Lessa, César A. Ruiz","doi":"10.1177/00420980251362648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines how urban centralities are socially constructed through mobility practices in Bogotá (Colombia) and Belo Horizonte (Brazil). As socially constructed geographies, centralities are shaped not only by agglomeration and density but also intersubjectively by mobility practices that vary widely depending on situational and relational dimensions of individuals such as gender, age, income, and their modal transport choices. To identify the formation of centralities beyond ‘traditional’ urban cores, we developed two indexes: the Diversity Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting a broad range of social groups, and the Differential Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting specific groups such as older people, women, low-income individuals and active transport users. The results show that while obligatory travel patterns align with planned centralities, distinct local centralities also emerge based on the spatial patterns of different social groups. In both cities, these local centralities appear not only in traditional cores but also in peripheral areas. These findings challenge the central–peripheral dichotomy often emphasised in urban planning and reinterpret urban centralities as dynamic, socially constructed spaces shaped by diverse and differential mobility practices.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobility practices and the social construction of urban centralities in Belo Horizonte (Brazil) and Bogotá (Colombia)\",\"authors\":\"Eugênia Viana Cerqueira, Ana Marcela Ardila Pinto, Natalia Villamizar-Duarte, Daniela Antunes Lessa, César A. Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00420980251362648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines how urban centralities are socially constructed through mobility practices in Bogotá (Colombia) and Belo Horizonte (Brazil). As socially constructed geographies, centralities are shaped not only by agglomeration and density but also intersubjectively by mobility practices that vary widely depending on situational and relational dimensions of individuals such as gender, age, income, and their modal transport choices. To identify the formation of centralities beyond ‘traditional’ urban cores, we developed two indexes: the Diversity Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting a broad range of social groups, and the Differential Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting specific groups such as older people, women, low-income individuals and active transport users. The results show that while obligatory travel patterns align with planned centralities, distinct local centralities also emerge based on the spatial patterns of different social groups. In both cities, these local centralities appear not only in traditional cores but also in peripheral areas. These findings challenge the central–peripheral dichotomy often emphasised in urban planning and reinterpret urban centralities as dynamic, socially constructed spaces shaped by diverse and differential mobility practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Studies\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251362648\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251362648","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过波哥大(哥伦比亚)和贝洛奥里藏特(巴西)的流动性实践考察了城市中心是如何在社会上构建的。作为社会建构的地理,中心性不仅受到集聚和密度的影响,而且在主体间也受到流动性实践的影响,这些实践因个人的情境和关系维度(如性别、年龄、收入和他们的交通方式选择)而有很大差异。为了确定“传统”城市核心之外的中心性形成,我们开发了两个指数:多样性中心性指数(Diversity centralities Index)和差异中心性指数(Differential centralities Index),前者确定了吸引广泛社会群体的地区,后者确定了吸引特定群体的地区,如老年人、女性、低收入人群和活跃的交通用户。结果表明,在强制性出行模式与规划中心性一致的同时,不同社会群体的空间格局也呈现出不同的地方中心性。在这两个城市,这些局部中心性不仅出现在传统的核心地区,也出现在外围地区。这些发现挑战了城市规划中经常强调的中心-外围二分法,并将城市中心性重新解释为由多样化和差异化的流动性实践塑造的动态的、社会构建的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobility practices and the social construction of urban centralities in Belo Horizonte (Brazil) and Bogotá (Colombia)
This paper examines how urban centralities are socially constructed through mobility practices in Bogotá (Colombia) and Belo Horizonte (Brazil). As socially constructed geographies, centralities are shaped not only by agglomeration and density but also intersubjectively by mobility practices that vary widely depending on situational and relational dimensions of individuals such as gender, age, income, and their modal transport choices. To identify the formation of centralities beyond ‘traditional’ urban cores, we developed two indexes: the Diversity Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting a broad range of social groups, and the Differential Centralities Index, which identifies areas attracting specific groups such as older people, women, low-income individuals and active transport users. The results show that while obligatory travel patterns align with planned centralities, distinct local centralities also emerge based on the spatial patterns of different social groups. In both cities, these local centralities appear not only in traditional cores but also in peripheral areas. These findings challenge the central–peripheral dichotomy often emphasised in urban planning and reinterpret urban centralities as dynamic, socially constructed spaces shaped by diverse and differential mobility practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信