外周神经手术联合外周神经刺激治疗难治性神经性疼痛

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Microsurgery Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1002/micr.70112
Floris V. Raasveld, Benjamin R. Johnston, David Hao, Ian L. Valerio, Kyle R. Eberlin
{"title":"外周神经手术联合外周神经刺激治疗难治性神经性疼痛","authors":"Floris V. Raasveld,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Johnston,&nbsp;David Hao,&nbsp;Ian L. Valerio,&nbsp;Kyle R. Eberlin","doi":"10.1002/micr.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can lead to chronic neuropathic pain, significantly impacting quality of life. While surgical intervention may offer relief in some cases, outcomes are variable. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) offers an alternative treatment approach for managing neuropathic pain in these patients. This study aims to describe the outcomes of a combined surgical and PNS approach for severe, refractory neuropathic pain following PNI or amputation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted on seven patients who underwent combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS at a specialized multidisciplinary nerve clinic. Patient-reported outcome measures, including pain scores, Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and quality of life metrics, were collected. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cohort included five males and two females (mean age 58.3 ± 8.9 years), with four amputees and three non-amputees. The average follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 0.8 years. Six out of seven patients reported reduced pain when the stimulator was activated, with an average pain score reduction of 4.4 ± 1.5 points. All seven patients reported improvement on the PGIC scale. Mean pain intensity and pain interference scores averaged 54.7 ± 5.5 and 66.3 ± 6.5, respectively. One patient underwent device removal due to irritation from the topical adhesive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This proof-of-concept study suggests that combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS may be a viable option for carefully selected patients with severe, refractory neuropathic pain. While pain reduction and functional improvement were observed in most patients, outcomes varied considerably. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize this combined approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"45 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Use of Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Neuropathic Pain\",\"authors\":\"Floris V. Raasveld,&nbsp;Benjamin R. Johnston,&nbsp;David Hao,&nbsp;Ian L. Valerio,&nbsp;Kyle R. Eberlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/micr.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can lead to chronic neuropathic pain, significantly impacting quality of life. While surgical intervention may offer relief in some cases, outcomes are variable. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) offers an alternative treatment approach for managing neuropathic pain in these patients. This study aims to describe the outcomes of a combined surgical and PNS approach for severe, refractory neuropathic pain following PNI or amputation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional survey was conducted on seven patients who underwent combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS at a specialized multidisciplinary nerve clinic. Patient-reported outcome measures, including pain scores, Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and quality of life metrics, were collected. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The cohort included five males and two females (mean age 58.3 ± 8.9 years), with four amputees and three non-amputees. The average follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 0.8 years. Six out of seven patients reported reduced pain when the stimulator was activated, with an average pain score reduction of 4.4 ± 1.5 points. All seven patients reported improvement on the PGIC scale. Mean pain intensity and pain interference scores averaged 54.7 ± 5.5 and 66.3 ± 6.5, respectively. One patient underwent device removal due to irritation from the topical adhesive.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This proof-of-concept study suggests that combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS may be a viable option for carefully selected patients with severe, refractory neuropathic pain. While pain reduction and functional improvement were observed in most patients, outcomes varied considerably. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize this combined approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microsurgery\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70112\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.70112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外周神经损伤(PNI)可导致慢性神经性疼痛,严重影响生活质量。虽然手术干预可能在某些情况下提供缓解,但结果是可变的。外周神经刺激(PNS)为这些患者的神经性疼痛提供了另一种治疗方法。本研究旨在描述联合手术和PNS入路治疗PNI或截肢后严重、难治性神经性疼痛的结果。方法对7例在某专科多学科神经门诊行外周神经联合手术和PNS的患者进行横断面调查。收集患者报告的结果测量,包括疼痛评分、患者总体变化印象(PGIC)和生活质量指标。回顾性回顾患者资料。结果男性5人,女性2人,平均年龄58.3±8.9岁,其中截肢者4人,非截肢者3人。平均随访时间为2.4±0.8年。当刺激器被激活时,7名患者中有6名报告疼痛减轻,平均疼痛评分降低4.4±1.5分。所有7例患者均报告PGIC评分改善。平均疼痛强度和疼痛干扰评分分别为54.7±5.5和66.3±6.5。一名患者由于局部粘接剂的刺激而接受了器械移除。结论:这项概念验证研究表明,对于精心挑选的严重难治性神经性疼痛患者,联合周围神经手术和PNS可能是一种可行的选择。虽然在大多数患者中观察到疼痛减轻和功能改善,但结果差异很大。未来的前瞻性研究需要更大的队列来完善患者选择标准并优化这种联合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Use of Peripheral Nerve Surgery and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Neuropathic Pain

Introduction

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can lead to chronic neuropathic pain, significantly impacting quality of life. While surgical intervention may offer relief in some cases, outcomes are variable. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) offers an alternative treatment approach for managing neuropathic pain in these patients. This study aims to describe the outcomes of a combined surgical and PNS approach for severe, refractory neuropathic pain following PNI or amputation.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on seven patients who underwent combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS at a specialized multidisciplinary nerve clinic. Patient-reported outcome measures, including pain scores, Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and quality of life metrics, were collected. Patient data were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

The cohort included five males and two females (mean age 58.3 ± 8.9 years), with four amputees and three non-amputees. The average follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 0.8 years. Six out of seven patients reported reduced pain when the stimulator was activated, with an average pain score reduction of 4.4 ± 1.5 points. All seven patients reported improvement on the PGIC scale. Mean pain intensity and pain interference scores averaged 54.7 ± 5.5 and 66.3 ± 6.5, respectively. One patient underwent device removal due to irritation from the topical adhesive.

Conclusion

This proof-of-concept study suggests that combined peripheral nerve surgery and PNS may be a viable option for carefully selected patients with severe, refractory neuropathic pain. While pain reduction and functional improvement were observed in most patients, outcomes varied considerably. Future prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize this combined approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信