Mohit Singh Rana, Rajesh Nandi, Paul B. Brown, Jen-Yi Huang, Ji-Qin Ni
{"title":"优化饲料混合比例和水力停留时间,以产沼气的奶牛粪便和水产污泥厌氧共消化","authors":"Mohit Singh Rana, Rajesh Nandi, Paul B. Brown, Jen-Yi Huang, Ji-Qin Ni","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquaculture sludge (AS), rich in nutrients, can pose environmental risks such as eutrophication, threatening aquatic ecosystems and water quality if not properly managed. However, AS can also be used as a feedstock for bioenergy production. This study investigated bioenergy (methane) production from AS and dairy manure (DM) under anaerobic codigestion using the biochemical methane potential test. Results showed that anaerobic codigestion of DM and AS produced higher methane production compared with their individual monodigestion. The DM:AS ratios of 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90 showed synergistic effects, with codigestion performance indices of 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. A DM:AS ratio of 10:90 provided the highest methane production of 341.80 mL g<sup>−1</sup> volatile solids, being 65% and 52% greater than those from monodigestion of these two feedstocks, respectively. A hydraulic retention time of 16 days was found optimum, attaining 90% of the cumulative methane production. The experimental data of methane production fitted perfectly with the superimposed model, reflecting contribution from both readily degradable and harder fractions of the feedstock mix. These findings present an approach to effective valorization and management of the nutrient-rich AS through enhanced energy recovery and promote sustainability in the aquaculture industry.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Feedstocks Mixing Ratio and Hydraulic Retention Time for Biogas Production From Anaerobic Codigestion of Dairy Manure and Aquaculture Sludge\",\"authors\":\"Mohit Singh Rana, Rajesh Nandi, Paul B. Brown, Jen-Yi Huang, Ji-Qin Ni\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aquaculture sludge (AS), rich in nutrients, can pose environmental risks such as eutrophication, threatening aquatic ecosystems and water quality if not properly managed. However, AS can also be used as a feedstock for bioenergy production. This study investigated bioenergy (methane) production from AS and dairy manure (DM) under anaerobic codigestion using the biochemical methane potential test. Results showed that anaerobic codigestion of DM and AS produced higher methane production compared with their individual monodigestion. The DM:AS ratios of 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90 showed synergistic effects, with codigestion performance indices of 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. A DM:AS ratio of 10:90 provided the highest methane production of 341.80 mL g<sup>−1</sup> volatile solids, being 65% and 52% greater than those from monodigestion of these two feedstocks, respectively. A hydraulic retention time of 16 days was found optimum, attaining 90% of the cumulative methane production. The experimental data of methane production fitted perfectly with the superimposed model, reflecting contribution from both readily degradable and harder fractions of the feedstock mix. These findings present an approach to effective valorization and management of the nutrient-rich AS through enhanced energy recovery and promote sustainability in the aquaculture industry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
水产养殖污泥富含营养物质,如果管理不当,可能造成富营养化等环境风险,威胁水生生态系统和水质。然而,AS也可以用作生物能源生产的原料。采用生化甲烷电位试验研究了厌氧共消化条件下牛粪和牛粪的沼气产量。结果表明,与单独消化相比,DM和AS厌氧共消化产生的甲烷量更高。DM:AS比例为50:50、30:70和10:90时表现出协同效应,共消化性能指数分别为1.2、1.3和1.5。DM:AS比为10:90时,甲烷产量最高,为341.80 mL g−1挥发性固体,分别比单消化这两种原料的甲烷产量高65%和52%。水力滞留时间为16天,可达到累积甲烷产量的90%。甲烷产量的实验数据与叠加模型完全吻合,反映了原料混合物中容易降解和较硬的部分的贡献。这些发现为通过加强能量回收和促进水产养殖业的可持续性来有效地评估和管理营养丰富的AS提供了途径。
Optimizing Feedstocks Mixing Ratio and Hydraulic Retention Time for Biogas Production From Anaerobic Codigestion of Dairy Manure and Aquaculture Sludge
Aquaculture sludge (AS), rich in nutrients, can pose environmental risks such as eutrophication, threatening aquatic ecosystems and water quality if not properly managed. However, AS can also be used as a feedstock for bioenergy production. This study investigated bioenergy (methane) production from AS and dairy manure (DM) under anaerobic codigestion using the biochemical methane potential test. Results showed that anaerobic codigestion of DM and AS produced higher methane production compared with their individual monodigestion. The DM:AS ratios of 50:50, 30:70, and 10:90 showed synergistic effects, with codigestion performance indices of 1.2, 1.3, and 1.5, respectively. A DM:AS ratio of 10:90 provided the highest methane production of 341.80 mL g−1 volatile solids, being 65% and 52% greater than those from monodigestion of these two feedstocks, respectively. A hydraulic retention time of 16 days was found optimum, attaining 90% of the cumulative methane production. The experimental data of methane production fitted perfectly with the superimposed model, reflecting contribution from both readily degradable and harder fractions of the feedstock mix. These findings present an approach to effective valorization and management of the nutrient-rich AS through enhanced energy recovery and promote sustainability in the aquaculture industry.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.