腹腔镜半球形肝切除7、8节段的标准化入路

IF 1.5 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
DEN open Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70203
Ryoichi Miyamoto, Masahiro Shiihara, Mitsuru Watanabe, Jiro Shimazaki, Mitsugi Shimoda, Shuji Suzuki
{"title":"腹腔镜半球形肝切除7、8节段的标准化入路","authors":"Ryoichi Miyamoto,&nbsp;Masahiro Shiihara,&nbsp;Mitsuru Watanabe,&nbsp;Jiro Shimazaki,&nbsp;Mitsugi Shimoda,&nbsp;Shuji Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated whether the standardized “can-opener method” surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic hemispheric liver resection for segments 7 and 8 using our standardized surgical technique were enrolled. To examine the effect of this standardized surgical procedure on short-term outcomes, patients were classified into two groups based on the timing of the standardization of their procedures (Group A, the first half of the cases, and Group B, the second half of the cases). Short-term outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Significant differences in operation time (465 min vs. 332 min, <i>p</i> = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss volume (645 g vs. 105 g, <i>p</i> = 0.011), postoperative complications (Clavien‒Dindo Grade I and Grade II) (7 vs. 1, <i>p</i> = 0.011), and length of postoperative hospital stay (10 days vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were detected between the two groups. All patients had negative surgical margins. With respect to postoperative complications, four patients had Grade I complications, such as wound infection and minor pneumonia, and four patients had Grade II complications, such as bile duct infection and intra-abdominal abscess. No patients experienced 90-day mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our standardized surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8 and is referred to as the “can-opener method”.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70203","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Approach for Laparoscopic Hemispheric Liver Resection for Segments 7 and 8\",\"authors\":\"Ryoichi Miyamoto,&nbsp;Masahiro Shiihara,&nbsp;Mitsuru Watanabe,&nbsp;Jiro Shimazaki,&nbsp;Mitsugi Shimoda,&nbsp;Shuji Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated whether the standardized “can-opener method” surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic hemispheric liver resection for segments 7 and 8 using our standardized surgical technique were enrolled. To examine the effect of this standardized surgical procedure on short-term outcomes, patients were classified into two groups based on the timing of the standardization of their procedures (Group A, the first half of the cases, and Group B, the second half of the cases). Short-term outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Significant differences in operation time (465 min vs. 332 min, <i>p</i> = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss volume (645 g vs. 105 g, <i>p</i> = 0.011), postoperative complications (Clavien‒Dindo Grade I and Grade II) (7 vs. 1, <i>p</i> = 0.011), and length of postoperative hospital stay (10 days vs. 7 days, <i>p</i> = 0.001) were detected between the two groups. All patients had negative surgical margins. With respect to postoperative complications, four patients had Grade I complications, such as wound infection and minor pneumonia, and four patients had Grade II complications, such as bile duct infection and intra-abdominal abscess. No patients experienced 90-day mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our standardized surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8 and is referred to as the “can-opener method”.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70203\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了标准化的“开罐器法”手术技术是否适合7节段和8节段半球形肝切除术。方法选取42例采用标准化手术技术行腹腔镜7段和8段半肝切除术的患者。为了检验这种标准化手术对短期预后的影响,根据手术标准化的时间将患者分为两组(A组,前一半的病例,B组,后一半的病例)。随后比较两组的短期结果。结果两组手术时间(465 min vs. 332 min, p = 0.001)、术中出血量(645 g vs. 105 g, p = 0.011)、术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo I级和II级)(7 vs. 1, p = 0.011)、术后住院时间(10 vs. 7 d, p = 0.001)差异均有统计学意义。所有患者的切缘均为阴性。术后并发症方面,4例患者出现I级并发症,如伤口感染、轻度肺炎,4例患者出现II级并发症,如胆管感染、腹内脓肿。没有患者出现90天死亡率。结论我们的标准化手术技术是一种适合7段和8段半球形肝切除术的手术方法,被称为“开罐法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Standardized Approach for Laparoscopic Hemispheric Liver Resection for Segments 7 and 8

Standardized Approach for Laparoscopic Hemispheric Liver Resection for Segments 7 and 8

Background

We investigated whether the standardized “can-opener method” surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8.

Methods

Forty-two patients who underwent laparoscopic hemispheric liver resection for segments 7 and 8 using our standardized surgical technique were enrolled. To examine the effect of this standardized surgical procedure on short-term outcomes, patients were classified into two groups based on the timing of the standardization of their procedures (Group A, the first half of the cases, and Group B, the second half of the cases). Short-term outcomes were subsequently compared between the two groups.

Results

Significant differences in operation time (465 min vs. 332 min, p = 0.001), intraoperative blood loss volume (645 g vs. 105 g, p = 0.011), postoperative complications (Clavien‒Dindo Grade I and Grade II) (7 vs. 1, p = 0.011), and length of postoperative hospital stay (10 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.001) were detected between the two groups. All patients had negative surgical margins. With respect to postoperative complications, four patients had Grade I complications, such as wound infection and minor pneumonia, and four patients had Grade II complications, such as bile duct infection and intra-abdominal abscess. No patients experienced 90-day mortality.

Conclusion

Our standardized surgical technique is an adequate surgical procedure for hemispheric hepatectomy in segments 7 and 8 and is referred to as the “can-opener method”.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信