陶瓷增强聚合物复合材料可加工性特性研究

IF 2.1 4区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS
Ajit Kumar Behera, Punyapriya Mishra, Trupti Ranjan Mahapatra, Punyatoya Mishra, Subhashree Priyadarsini Dash
{"title":"陶瓷增强聚合物复合材料可加工性特性研究","authors":"Ajit Kumar Behera,&nbsp;Punyapriya Mishra,&nbsp;Trupti Ranjan Mahapatra,&nbsp;Punyatoya Mishra,&nbsp;Subhashree Priyadarsini Dash","doi":"10.1007/s41779-025-01194-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the machinability of hybrid polymer ceramic composites (PCCs) using abrasive jet machining (AJM). Composite samples were fabricated by incorporating barium titanate (BT: BaTiO<sub>3</sub>) and calcium copper titanate (CCT: CaCu<sub>3</sub>Ti<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>) in varying ratios (BT: CCT = 100:0, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 0:100) within an epoxy resin matrix (20:80). As BT was substituted with CCT, density decreased and porosity by 11.66% and 28.85%, respectively. A 60:40 BT-CCT blend improved tensile strength, flexural strength, impact resistance, and microhardness by 12.26%, 46.72%, 21.74%, and 27.41%, respectively. Machinability evaluation was conducted using 150-micron SiC abrasives in an AJM system by following Taguchi’s method. The rate of material removal (RMR) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed across five PCC compositions, varying pressure (2–6 bar) and standoff distance (2–6 mm). ANOVA determined the significance of control factors, and optimal machining settings were identified that improved RMR and Ra through 3.7998% and 0.8651%. The desirability approach in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed for individual and combined optimization of machining parameters, with confirmatory tests validating performance enhancements. A high degree of accuracy is observed with 1.187% and 1.079% deviation between predicted and actual values for RMR for Ra.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":673,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","volume":"61 4","pages":"1583 - 1599"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of machinability characteristics of ceramic reinforced polymer composites\",\"authors\":\"Ajit Kumar Behera,&nbsp;Punyapriya Mishra,&nbsp;Trupti Ranjan Mahapatra,&nbsp;Punyatoya Mishra,&nbsp;Subhashree Priyadarsini Dash\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41779-025-01194-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates the machinability of hybrid polymer ceramic composites (PCCs) using abrasive jet machining (AJM). Composite samples were fabricated by incorporating barium titanate (BT: BaTiO<sub>3</sub>) and calcium copper titanate (CCT: CaCu<sub>3</sub>Ti<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>) in varying ratios (BT: CCT = 100:0, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 0:100) within an epoxy resin matrix (20:80). As BT was substituted with CCT, density decreased and porosity by 11.66% and 28.85%, respectively. A 60:40 BT-CCT blend improved tensile strength, flexural strength, impact resistance, and microhardness by 12.26%, 46.72%, 21.74%, and 27.41%, respectively. Machinability evaluation was conducted using 150-micron SiC abrasives in an AJM system by following Taguchi’s method. The rate of material removal (RMR) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed across five PCC compositions, varying pressure (2–6 bar) and standoff distance (2–6 mm). ANOVA determined the significance of control factors, and optimal machining settings were identified that improved RMR and Ra through 3.7998% and 0.8651%. The desirability approach in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed for individual and combined optimization of machining parameters, with confirmatory tests validating performance enhancements. A high degree of accuracy is observed with 1.187% and 1.079% deviation between predicted and actual values for RMR for Ra.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"1583 - 1599\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-025-01194-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41779-025-01194-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用磨料射流加工技术研究了混合聚合物陶瓷复合材料(PCCs)的可加工性。将钛酸钡(BT: BaTiO3)和钛酸铜钙(CCT: ccu3ti4o12)以不同的比例(BT: CCT = 100: 0,60: 40,50:50, 40:60, 0:100)掺入环氧树脂基体(20:80)中制备复合样品。用CCT替代BT后,密度降低11.66%,孔隙率降低28.85%。60:40 BT-CCT共混物的拉伸强度、抗弯强度、抗冲击性和显微硬度分别提高了12.26%、46.72%、21.74%和27.41%。采用Taguchi方法对150微米SiC磨料在AJM系统中的切削性能进行了评价。分析了五种PCC成分、不同压力(2-6 bar)和不同距离(2-6 mm)下的材料去除率(RMR)和表面粗糙度(Ra)。方差分析确定了控制因素的显著性,并确定了最佳加工设置,RMR和Ra分别提高了3.7998%和0.8651%。采用响应面法(RSM)中的可取性方法对加工参数进行单独和组合优化,并通过验证性试验验证了性能的提高。Ra的RMR预测值与实际值的偏差分别为1.187%和1.079%,准确度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of machinability characteristics of ceramic reinforced polymer composites

This study investigates the machinability of hybrid polymer ceramic composites (PCCs) using abrasive jet machining (AJM). Composite samples were fabricated by incorporating barium titanate (BT: BaTiO3) and calcium copper titanate (CCT: CaCu3Ti4O12) in varying ratios (BT: CCT = 100:0, 60:40, 50:50, 40:60, 0:100) within an epoxy resin matrix (20:80). As BT was substituted with CCT, density decreased and porosity by 11.66% and 28.85%, respectively. A 60:40 BT-CCT blend improved tensile strength, flexural strength, impact resistance, and microhardness by 12.26%, 46.72%, 21.74%, and 27.41%, respectively. Machinability evaluation was conducted using 150-micron SiC abrasives in an AJM system by following Taguchi’s method. The rate of material removal (RMR) and surface roughness (Ra) were analyzed across five PCC compositions, varying pressure (2–6 bar) and standoff distance (2–6 mm). ANOVA determined the significance of control factors, and optimal machining settings were identified that improved RMR and Ra through 3.7998% and 0.8651%. The desirability approach in Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed for individual and combined optimization of machining parameters, with confirmatory tests validating performance enhancements. A high degree of accuracy is observed with 1.187% and 1.079% deviation between predicted and actual values for RMR for Ra.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Materials Science-Materials Chemistry
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Publishes high quality research and technical papers in all areas of ceramic and related materials Spans the broad and growing fields of ceramic technology, material science and bioceramics Chronicles new advances in ceramic materials, manufacturing processes and applications Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society since 1965 Professional language editing service is available through our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service and American Journal Experts at the author''s cost and does not guarantee that the manuscript will be reviewed or accepted
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信