塑造下一代转化产品预测和毒理学评估的硅前沿

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Paul Löffler*, Emma L. Schymanski, Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*, 
{"title":"塑造下一代转化产品预测和毒理学评估的硅前沿","authors":"Paul Löffler*,&nbsp;Emma L. Schymanski,&nbsp;Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. <i>In silico</i> methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of <i>in silico</i> predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying <i>in silico</i> methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.</p><p >This perspective highlights emerging <i>in silico</i> approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 36","pages":"19095–19106"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Silico Frontiers Shaping the Next Generation of Transformation Product Prediction and Toxicological Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Paul Löffler*,&nbsp;Emma L. Schymanski,&nbsp;Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. <i>In silico</i> methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of <i>in silico</i> predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying <i>in silico</i> methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.</p><p >This perspective highlights emerging <i>in silico</i> approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 36\",\"pages\":\"19095–19106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转化产物(TPs)的表征对于了解化学命运和潜在的环境危害至关重要。TPs通过(a)生物过程形成,可以在与其母体化合物相当甚至超过母体化合物的环境浓度中检测到,表明毒理学相关性。然而,由于转换过程的复杂性和数据不足,确定它们是具有挑战性的。预测TP形成和毒性的计算机方法是有效的,并支持化学品风险评估的优先级,但需要足够的数据来改进结果。这篇观点文章探讨了计算方法在评估tp及其潜在影响中的作用,包括基于规则的模型、基于机器学习的方法和基于qsar的毒性预测,重点是公开可用的工具。虽然将这些方法集成到计算工作流程中可以支持监管决策和优先级策略,但预测模型可能面临与适用性领域、数据偏差和机制不确定性相关的限制。为了更好地传达计算机预测的结果,提出了一个四种不同置信度的框架,以支持将TP预测和毒性评估整合到计算管道中。本文重点介绍了应用计算机方法进行TP评估的当前进展、挑战和未来方向,强调需要更多的数据和专家解释来提高模型的可靠性和监管适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In Silico Frontiers Shaping the Next Generation of Transformation Product Prediction and Toxicological Assessment

In Silico Frontiers Shaping the Next Generation of Transformation Product Prediction and Toxicological Assessment

The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. In silico methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of in silico predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying in silico methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.

This perspective highlights emerging in silico approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信