Paul Löffler*, Emma L. Schymanski, Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*,
{"title":"塑造下一代转化产品预测和毒理学评估的硅前沿","authors":"Paul Löffler*, Emma L. Schymanski, Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. <i>In silico</i> methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of <i>in silico</i> predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying <i>in silico</i> methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.</p><p >This perspective highlights emerging <i>in silico</i> approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 36","pages":"19095–19106"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Silico Frontiers Shaping the Next Generation of Transformation Product Prediction and Toxicological Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Paul Löffler*, Emma L. Schymanski, Henning Henschel and Foon Yin Lai*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. <i>In silico</i> methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of <i>in silico</i> predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying <i>in silico</i> methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.</p><p >This perspective highlights emerging <i>in silico</i> approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"59 36\",\"pages\":\"19095–19106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5c06790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Silico Frontiers Shaping the Next Generation of Transformation Product Prediction and Toxicological Assessment
The characterization of transformation products (TPs) is crucial for understanding chemical fate and potential environmental hazards. TPs form through (a)biotic processes and can be detected in environmental concentrations comparable to or even exceeding their parent compounds, indicating toxicological relevance. However, identifying them is challenging due to the complexity of transformation processes and insufficient data. In silico methods for predicting TP formation and toxicity are efficient and support prioritization for chemical risk assessment, yet require sufficient data for improved results. This perspective article explores the role of computational approaches in assessing TPs and their potential effects, including rule-based models, machine learning-based methods, and QSAR-based toxicity predictions, focusing on openly available tools. While integrating these approaches into computational workflows can support regulatory decision-making and prioritization strategies, predictive models can face limitations related to applicability domains, data biases, and mechanistic uncertainties. To better communicate the results of in silico predictions, a framework of four distinct levels of confidence is proposed to support the integration of TP prediction and toxicity assessment into computational pipelines. This article highlights current advances, challenges, and future directions in applying in silico methodologies for TP evaluation, emphasizing the need for more data and expert interpretation to enhance model reliability and regulatory applicability.
This perspective highlights emerging in silico approaches for predicting transformation products and their toxicity, advancing environmental risk assessment methodologies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.