黄铜矿微量元素组成作为岩浆和热液环境中矿床类型识别的工具:机器学习方法

IF 4.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Enzo Caraballo, Georges Beaudoin, Sarah Dare
{"title":"黄铜矿微量元素组成作为岩浆和热液环境中矿床类型识别的工具:机器学习方法","authors":"Enzo Caraballo, Georges Beaudoin, Sarah Dare","doi":"10.1007/s00126-025-01388-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on developing an optimal machine learning classifier to predict chalcopyrite provenance using trace element composition and to provide a robust indicator mineral tool for exploration. The trace element dataset, measured by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), comprises 2562 analyses, of which 1832 are from this study and 730 are compiled from literature, from 155 representative deposits worldwide belonging to 8 major deposit types. Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were tested in three contexts. The RF algorithm yields the highest overall accuracies for discrimination between: 1) magmatic and hydrothermal deposits with Ni-Ga-In-Sb–Se-Ag-Zn-Pb–Sn-Bi as predictors (97.2%), 2) Ni-Cu sulfide and Reef-type PGE deposits with Te-Sn-Se-In-Bi-Zn as predictors (98.3%), and 3) different hydrothermal deposit types using Se-Zn-Sn-In-Ga-Te-Ag-Sb-Bi-Co–Ni-Pb (93%). Additionally, the three classifiers were tested with literature data not included in the training phase (blind data) to assess the robustness in prediction, yielding a mean accuracy &gt; 75%. The RF models were applied to classify literature chalcopyrite data from glacial till and esker sediments overlying the Churchill Province, Canada. Our models suggest that 65.4% of the detrital grains belong to hydrothermal deposits, primarily with porphyry (35.3%), iron oxide copper–gold (IOCG, 36.6%) and volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS, 22.5%) sources, whereas 34.6% have a magmatic provenance (80.9% Ni-Cu sulfide and 19.1% Reef-type PGE deposits). Our RF models provide an accurate and robust tool to fingerprint deposit types using trace element composition of chalcopyrite for mineral exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18682,"journal":{"name":"Mineralium Deposita","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trace element composition of chalcopyrite as a tool for deposit type discrimination from magmatic and hydrothermal settings: a machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Enzo Caraballo, Georges Beaudoin, Sarah Dare\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00126-025-01388-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study focuses on developing an optimal machine learning classifier to predict chalcopyrite provenance using trace element composition and to provide a robust indicator mineral tool for exploration. The trace element dataset, measured by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), comprises 2562 analyses, of which 1832 are from this study and 730 are compiled from literature, from 155 representative deposits worldwide belonging to 8 major deposit types. Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were tested in three contexts. The RF algorithm yields the highest overall accuracies for discrimination between: 1) magmatic and hydrothermal deposits with Ni-Ga-In-Sb–Se-Ag-Zn-Pb–Sn-Bi as predictors (97.2%), 2) Ni-Cu sulfide and Reef-type PGE deposits with Te-Sn-Se-In-Bi-Zn as predictors (98.3%), and 3) different hydrothermal deposit types using Se-Zn-Sn-In-Ga-Te-Ag-Sb-Bi-Co–Ni-Pb (93%). Additionally, the three classifiers were tested with literature data not included in the training phase (blind data) to assess the robustness in prediction, yielding a mean accuracy &gt; 75%. The RF models were applied to classify literature chalcopyrite data from glacial till and esker sediments overlying the Churchill Province, Canada. Our models suggest that 65.4% of the detrital grains belong to hydrothermal deposits, primarily with porphyry (35.3%), iron oxide copper–gold (IOCG, 36.6%) and volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS, 22.5%) sources, whereas 34.6% have a magmatic provenance (80.9% Ni-Cu sulfide and 19.1% Reef-type PGE deposits). Our RF models provide an accurate and robust tool to fingerprint deposit types using trace element composition of chalcopyrite for mineral exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineralium Deposita\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineralium Deposita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-025-01388-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralium Deposita","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-025-01388-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是开发一种最佳的机器学习分类器,利用微量元素组成预测黄铜矿的来源,并为勘探提供一个强大的指示矿物工具。利用激光烧蚀-电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)测量的微量元素数据集包括2562个分析,其中1832个来自本研究,730个来自文献汇编,来自全球155个代表性矿床,属于8个主要矿床类型。随机森林(Random Forest, RF)、人工神经网络(Artificial Neural Network, ANN)、k近邻(K-Nearest Neighbors, KNN)、朴素贝叶斯(Naive Bayes, NB)和偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)在三种情况下进行了测试。RF算法在以下三种类型的区分中获得了最高的总体精度:1)岩浆型和热液型矿床(预测因子为Ni-Ga-In-Sb-Se-Ag-Zn-Pb-Sn-Bi - bi) (97.2%), 2) Ni-Cu硫化物型和礁型PGE矿床(预测因子为Te-Sn-Se-In-Bi-Zn)(98.3%),以及3)不同热液型矿床(预测因子为Se-Zn-Sn-In-Ga-Te-Ag-Sb-Bi-Co-Ni-Pb)(93%)。此外,使用未包含在训练阶段的文献数据(盲数据)对这三个分类器进行测试,以评估预测的稳健性,平均准确率为75%。应用RF模型对加拿大丘吉尔省冰川碛物和esker沉积物中的黄铜矿资料进行了分类。模型显示,65.4%的碎屑颗粒属于热液矿床,主要为斑岩(35.3%)、氧化铁铜金(IOCG, 36.6%)和火山块状硫化物(VMS, 22.5%), 34.6%为岩浆物源(80.9%的镍铜硫化物和19.1%的礁型PGE矿床)。我们的RF模型为利用黄铜矿微量元素组成进行矿产勘查提供了一种准确、可靠的矿床类型指纹识别工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trace element composition of chalcopyrite as a tool for deposit type discrimination from magmatic and hydrothermal settings: a machine learning approach

This study focuses on developing an optimal machine learning classifier to predict chalcopyrite provenance using trace element composition and to provide a robust indicator mineral tool for exploration. The trace element dataset, measured by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS), comprises 2562 analyses, of which 1832 are from this study and 730 are compiled from literature, from 155 representative deposits worldwide belonging to 8 major deposit types. Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) were tested in three contexts. The RF algorithm yields the highest overall accuracies for discrimination between: 1) magmatic and hydrothermal deposits with Ni-Ga-In-Sb–Se-Ag-Zn-Pb–Sn-Bi as predictors (97.2%), 2) Ni-Cu sulfide and Reef-type PGE deposits with Te-Sn-Se-In-Bi-Zn as predictors (98.3%), and 3) different hydrothermal deposit types using Se-Zn-Sn-In-Ga-Te-Ag-Sb-Bi-Co–Ni-Pb (93%). Additionally, the three classifiers were tested with literature data not included in the training phase (blind data) to assess the robustness in prediction, yielding a mean accuracy > 75%. The RF models were applied to classify literature chalcopyrite data from glacial till and esker sediments overlying the Churchill Province, Canada. Our models suggest that 65.4% of the detrital grains belong to hydrothermal deposits, primarily with porphyry (35.3%), iron oxide copper–gold (IOCG, 36.6%) and volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS, 22.5%) sources, whereas 34.6% have a magmatic provenance (80.9% Ni-Cu sulfide and 19.1% Reef-type PGE deposits). Our RF models provide an accurate and robust tool to fingerprint deposit types using trace element composition of chalcopyrite for mineral exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mineralium Deposita
Mineralium Deposita 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The journal Mineralium Deposita introduces new observations, principles, and interpretations from the field of economic geology, including nonmetallic mineral deposits, experimental and applied geochemistry, with emphasis on mineral deposits. It offers short and comprehensive articles, review papers, brief original papers, scientific discussions and news, as well as reports on meetings of importance to mineral research. The emphasis is on high-quality content and form for all articles and on international coverage of subject matter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信