荟萃分析:活体肝移植与已故肝移植治疗原发性硬化性胆管炎的比较

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ana Beatriz Afonso, Carolina Morais da Silva, Paulo Nogueira, Mariana Verdelho Machado
{"title":"荟萃分析:活体肝移植与已故肝移植治疗原发性硬化性胆管炎的比较","authors":"Ana Beatriz Afonso,&nbsp;Carolina Morais da Silva,&nbsp;Paulo Nogueira,&nbsp;Mariana Verdelho Machado","doi":"10.1111/apt.70357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease that paradoxically accounts for 5%–15% of liver transplants (LT). The paucity of liver donors is boosting living donor LT (LDLT). We reviewed the literature regarding outcomes of LT in PSC, comparing LDLT with deceased donor LT (DDLT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed through a search on: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central, from inception to December 2024. In total, 22 studies were included, enrolling 22,024 patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with LDLT, DDLT was associated with lower 1- (93.80% [95% CI 93.29–94.31] vs. 95.78% [95% CI 94.68–96.88]), 3- (88.81% [95% CI 88.14–89.48] vs. 93.23% [95% CI 91.85–94.61]) and 5-year survival (85.18% [95% CI 84.43–85.92] vs. 91.54% [95% CI 91.01–93.07]), although it had no impact on graft survival. DDLT was associated with a higher risk of post-LT sepsis (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02–13.26]), acute rejection (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12–2.73]) and PSC recurrence (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10–2.42]), but a lower risk of biliary complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11–0.78]). DDLT recipients were older (MD 4.26 years [95% CI 2.42–6.10]), with higher metabolic dysfunction, more advanced liver disease (higher MELD: MD 6.63 [95% CI 5.56–7.70]), but lower chances of having inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50–0.87]) or cholangiocarcinoma (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53–0.92]). DDLT donors were older (MD 2.46 years [95% CI 0.76–4.15]) and cold ischemia time was longer (MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18–8.08]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In PSC, LDLT seems to be associated with higher post-LT survival, compared with DDLT. This could be explained by earlier referral to LT with lower liver disease burden and better performance status; better graft quality; and shorter cold ischaemia time. PSC patients requiring LT should be encouraged to consider LDLT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"62 8","pages":"768-787"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis: Comparison of Living Versus Deceased Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis\",\"authors\":\"Ana Beatriz Afonso,&nbsp;Carolina Morais da Silva,&nbsp;Paulo Nogueira,&nbsp;Mariana Verdelho Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/apt.70357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease that paradoxically accounts for 5%–15% of liver transplants (LT). The paucity of liver donors is boosting living donor LT (LDLT). We reviewed the literature regarding outcomes of LT in PSC, comparing LDLT with deceased donor LT (DDLT).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed through a search on: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central, from inception to December 2024. In total, 22 studies were included, enrolling 22,024 patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared with LDLT, DDLT was associated with lower 1- (93.80% [95% CI 93.29–94.31] vs. 95.78% [95% CI 94.68–96.88]), 3- (88.81% [95% CI 88.14–89.48] vs. 93.23% [95% CI 91.85–94.61]) and 5-year survival (85.18% [95% CI 84.43–85.92] vs. 91.54% [95% CI 91.01–93.07]), although it had no impact on graft survival. DDLT was associated with a higher risk of post-LT sepsis (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02–13.26]), acute rejection (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12–2.73]) and PSC recurrence (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10–2.42]), but a lower risk of biliary complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11–0.78]). DDLT recipients were older (MD 4.26 years [95% CI 2.42–6.10]), with higher metabolic dysfunction, more advanced liver disease (higher MELD: MD 6.63 [95% CI 5.56–7.70]), but lower chances of having inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50–0.87]) or cholangiocarcinoma (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53–0.92]). DDLT donors were older (MD 2.46 years [95% CI 0.76–4.15]) and cold ischemia time was longer (MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18–8.08]).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In PSC, LDLT seems to be associated with higher post-LT survival, compared with DDLT. This could be explained by earlier referral to LT with lower liver disease burden and better performance status; better graft quality; and shorter cold ischaemia time. PSC patients requiring LT should be encouraged to consider LDLT.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"768-787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70357\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)是一种罕见的疾病,仅占肝移植(LT)的5%-15%。肝供体的缺乏促进了活体肝移植(LDLT)的发展。我们回顾了关于PSC中肝移植结果的文献,比较了LDLT和已故供者肝移植(DDLT)。方法通过检索PubMed、Web - of - Science、Scopus和Cochrane Central,从成立到2024年12月进行系统评价和meta分析。总共纳入22项研究,纳入22,024名患者。结果与LDLT相比,DDLT与较低的1‐(93.80% [95% CI 93.29-94.31]比95.78% [95% CI 94.68-96.88])、3‐(88.81% [95% CI 88.14-89.48]比93.23% [95% CI 91.85-94.61])和5‐年生存率(85.18% [95% CI 84.43-85.92]比91.54% [95% CI 91.01-93.07])相关,尽管它对移植物存活没有影响。DDLT与LT后脓毒症(OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02-13.26])、急性排斥反应(OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12-2.73])和PSC复发(OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10-2.42])的高风险相关,但胆道并发症的风险较低(OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11-0.78])。DDLT受者年龄较大(MD为4.26岁[95% CI 2.42-6.10]),代谢功能障碍较高,肝脏疾病更严重(MELD较高:MD为6.63 [95% CI 5.56-7.70]),但患炎症性肠病(OR为0.66 [95% CI 0.50-0.87])或胆管癌(OR为0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.92])的几率较低。DDLT供者年龄较大(MD 2.46岁[95% CI 0.76-4.15]),冷缺血时间较长(MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18-8.08])。结论:在PSC中,与DDLT相比,LDLT似乎与更高的LT后生存率相关。这可以解释为早期转诊到肝移植,肝脏疾病负担较低,运动状态较好;接枝质量好;冷缺血时间短。应鼓励需要肝移植的PSC患者考虑肝移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-Analysis: Comparison of Living Versus Deceased Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

Background and Aims

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease that paradoxically accounts for 5%–15% of liver transplants (LT). The paucity of liver donors is boosting living donor LT (LDLT). We reviewed the literature regarding outcomes of LT in PSC, comparing LDLT with deceased donor LT (DDLT).

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed through a search on: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central, from inception to December 2024. In total, 22 studies were included, enrolling 22,024 patients.

Results

Compared with LDLT, DDLT was associated with lower 1- (93.80% [95% CI 93.29–94.31] vs. 95.78% [95% CI 94.68–96.88]), 3- (88.81% [95% CI 88.14–89.48] vs. 93.23% [95% CI 91.85–94.61]) and 5-year survival (85.18% [95% CI 84.43–85.92] vs. 91.54% [95% CI 91.01–93.07]), although it had no impact on graft survival. DDLT was associated with a higher risk of post-LT sepsis (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02–13.26]), acute rejection (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12–2.73]) and PSC recurrence (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10–2.42]), but a lower risk of biliary complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11–0.78]). DDLT recipients were older (MD 4.26 years [95% CI 2.42–6.10]), with higher metabolic dysfunction, more advanced liver disease (higher MELD: MD 6.63 [95% CI 5.56–7.70]), but lower chances of having inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50–0.87]) or cholangiocarcinoma (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53–0.92]). DDLT donors were older (MD 2.46 years [95% CI 0.76–4.15]) and cold ischemia time was longer (MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18–8.08]).

Conclusion

In PSC, LDLT seems to be associated with higher post-LT survival, compared with DDLT. This could be explained by earlier referral to LT with lower liver disease burden and better performance status; better graft quality; and shorter cold ischaemia time. PSC patients requiring LT should be encouraged to consider LDLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
7.90%
发文量
527
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信