显式时间步进压力校正方法的误差分析

IF 1.8 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Utku Kaya, Thomas Richter
{"title":"显式时间步进压力校正方法的误差分析","authors":"Utku Kaya,&nbsp;Thomas Richter","doi":"10.1002/fld.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The pressure-correction method is a well-established approach for simulating unsteady, incompressible fluids. It is well-known that implicit discretization of the time derivative in the momentum equation, for example, using a backward differentiation formula with explicit handling of the nonlinear term, results in a conditionally stable method. In certain scenarios, employing explicit time integration in the momentum equation can be advantageous, as it avoids the need to solve for a system matrix involving each differential operator. Additionally, we demonstrate that the fully discrete method can be written in the form of simple matrix-vector multiplications, allowing for efficient implementation on modern and highly parallel acceleration hardware. Despite being a common practice in various commercial codes, there is currently no literature available on error analysis for this scenario. In this work, we conduct a theoretical analysis of both implicit and two explicit variants of the pressure-correction method in a fully discrete setting. We demonstrate the extent to which the presented implicit and explicit methods exhibit conditional stability. Furthermore, we establish a Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) type condition for the explicit scheme and show that the explicit variant demonstrates the same asymptotic behavior as the implicit variant when the CFL condition is satisfied.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":"97 10","pages":"1363-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error Analysis of a Pressure-Correction Method With Explicit Time-Stepping\",\"authors\":\"Utku Kaya,&nbsp;Thomas Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The pressure-correction method is a well-established approach for simulating unsteady, incompressible fluids. It is well-known that implicit discretization of the time derivative in the momentum equation, for example, using a backward differentiation formula with explicit handling of the nonlinear term, results in a conditionally stable method. In certain scenarios, employing explicit time integration in the momentum equation can be advantageous, as it avoids the need to solve for a system matrix involving each differential operator. Additionally, we demonstrate that the fully discrete method can be written in the form of simple matrix-vector multiplications, allowing for efficient implementation on modern and highly parallel acceleration hardware. Despite being a common practice in various commercial codes, there is currently no literature available on error analysis for this scenario. In this work, we conduct a theoretical analysis of both implicit and two explicit variants of the pressure-correction method in a fully discrete setting. We demonstrate the extent to which the presented implicit and explicit methods exhibit conditional stability. Furthermore, we establish a Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) type condition for the explicit scheme and show that the explicit variant demonstrates the same asymptotic behavior as the implicit variant when the CFL condition is satisfied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":\"97 10\",\"pages\":\"1363-1378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fld.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.70000\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

压力修正法是一种成熟的模拟非定常、不可压缩流体的方法。众所周知,动量方程中时间导数的隐式离散化,例如,使用带非线性项显式处理的后向微分公式,可以得到条件稳定方法。在某些情况下,在动量方程中使用显式时间积分可能是有利的,因为它避免了需要求解涉及每个微分算子的系统矩阵。此外,我们证明了完全离散的方法可以写成简单的矩阵-向量乘法的形式,允许在现代和高度并行的加速硬件上有效实现。尽管在各种商业代码中是一种常见的做法,但目前还没有关于这种情况的错误分析的文献。在这项工作中,我们在完全离散设置下对压力校正方法的隐式和两个显式变体进行了理论分析。我们证明了所提出的隐式和显式方法在多大程度上表现出条件稳定性。进一步,我们建立了显式格式的一个Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL)型条件,并证明了当CFL条件满足时,显式变量与隐式变量具有相同的渐近行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Error Analysis of a Pressure-Correction Method With Explicit Time-Stepping

Error Analysis of a Pressure-Correction Method With Explicit Time-Stepping

The pressure-correction method is a well-established approach for simulating unsteady, incompressible fluids. It is well-known that implicit discretization of the time derivative in the momentum equation, for example, using a backward differentiation formula with explicit handling of the nonlinear term, results in a conditionally stable method. In certain scenarios, employing explicit time integration in the momentum equation can be advantageous, as it avoids the need to solve for a system matrix involving each differential operator. Additionally, we demonstrate that the fully discrete method can be written in the form of simple matrix-vector multiplications, allowing for efficient implementation on modern and highly parallel acceleration hardware. Despite being a common practice in various commercial codes, there is currently no literature available on error analysis for this scenario. In this work, we conduct a theoretical analysis of both implicit and two explicit variants of the pressure-correction method in a fully discrete setting. We demonstrate the extent to which the presented implicit and explicit methods exhibit conditional stability. Furthermore, we establish a Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) type condition for the explicit scheme and show that the explicit variant demonstrates the same asymptotic behavior as the implicit variant when the CFL condition is satisfied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信