Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez
{"title":"新自由主义者如何投票?层级强化中基于权力的不对称","authors":"Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez","doi":"10.1111/asap.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (<i>N</i> = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do neoliberals vote? Power-based asymmetries in hierarchy-enhancement\",\"authors\":\"Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asap.70029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (<i>N</i> = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
How do neoliberals vote? Power-based asymmetries in hierarchy-enhancement
Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (N = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.
期刊介绍:
Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.