中国春秋时期(公元前770-476年)对银和铁的采用轨迹

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeometry Pub Date : 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1111/arcm.13088
Jonathan R. Wood, Yaxiong Liu
{"title":"中国春秋时期(公元前770-476年)对银和铁的采用轨迹","authors":"Jonathan R. Wood,&nbsp;Yaxiong Liu","doi":"10.1111/arcm.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine the number of sites with silver objects in China over a period of 3500 years to suggest that technologies that stimulated the indigenous exploitation of silver-bearing ores were innovated during the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BCE), and that increased centralisation and bureaucratisation from the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) advanced their adoption. This culture of innovation should have extended to other prestige metals used for decorative objects, such as bloomery iron. However, bloomery iron, although rare prior to the 5th century BCE, disappears almost entirely from the archaeological record in China after this time. We recognise that the movement of objects and ideas across the Eurasian Steppe was potentially the impetus for both silver- and bloomery iron-production technologies in China, but that the adoption trajectory of bloomery iron diverged from that of silver because of the introduction of mass-produced cast iron. In effect, we propose that bloomery iron's status and value diminished when iron became recognised as a utilitarian material; that is, the Chinese invention of cast iron stymied the adoption of the bloomery process and effectively signed the death warrant of iron as a prestige metal.</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"67 5","pages":"1267-1282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.13088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories of adoption for silver and bloomery iron in China from the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BC)\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan R. Wood,&nbsp;Yaxiong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/arcm.13088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examine the number of sites with silver objects in China over a period of 3500 years to suggest that technologies that stimulated the indigenous exploitation of silver-bearing ores were innovated during the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BCE), and that increased centralisation and bureaucratisation from the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) advanced their adoption. This culture of innovation should have extended to other prestige metals used for decorative objects, such as bloomery iron. However, bloomery iron, although rare prior to the 5th century BCE, disappears almost entirely from the archaeological record in China after this time. We recognise that the movement of objects and ideas across the Eurasian Steppe was potentially the impetus for both silver- and bloomery iron-production technologies in China, but that the adoption trajectory of bloomery iron diverged from that of silver because of the introduction of mass-produced cast iron. In effect, we propose that bloomery iron's status and value diminished when iron became recognised as a utilitarian material; that is, the Chinese invention of cast iron stymied the adoption of the bloomery process and effectively signed the death warrant of iron as a prestige metal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"1267-1282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/arcm.13088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了3500年来中国银器遗址的数量,表明刺激含银矿开采的技术是在春秋时期(公元前770-476年)创新的,而战国时期(公元前475-221年)中央集权和官僚主义的增加促进了它们的采用。这种创新文化应该延伸到其他用于装饰物品的高级金属,比如灯笼铁。然而,虽然在公元前5世纪之前很少见,但在此之后,中国的考古记录几乎完全消失了。我们认识到,欧亚草原上物品和思想的流动可能是中国银铁和铁制品生产技术的推动力,但由于大规模生产铸铁的引入,铁制品的采用轨迹与银制品的采用轨迹有所不同。实际上,我们认为,当铁被认为是一种实用材料时,开花铁的地位和价值就会下降;也就是说,中国铸铁的发明阻碍了bloomery工艺的采用,并有效地签署了铁作为威望金属的死刑令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trajectories of adoption for silver and bloomery iron in China from the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BC)

Trajectories of adoption for silver and bloomery iron in China from the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BC)

We examine the number of sites with silver objects in China over a period of 3500 years to suggest that technologies that stimulated the indigenous exploitation of silver-bearing ores were innovated during the Spring and Autumn period (c. 770–476 BCE), and that increased centralisation and bureaucratisation from the Warring States period (475–221 BCE) advanced their adoption. This culture of innovation should have extended to other prestige metals used for decorative objects, such as bloomery iron. However, bloomery iron, although rare prior to the 5th century BCE, disappears almost entirely from the archaeological record in China after this time. We recognise that the movement of objects and ideas across the Eurasian Steppe was potentially the impetus for both silver- and bloomery iron-production technologies in China, but that the adoption trajectory of bloomery iron diverged from that of silver because of the introduction of mass-produced cast iron. In effect, we propose that bloomery iron's status and value diminished when iron became recognised as a utilitarian material; that is, the Chinese invention of cast iron stymied the adoption of the bloomery process and effectively signed the death warrant of iron as a prestige metal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeometry
Archaeometry 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance. The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信