Hande Nur Öncü, Gökçen Ege, Neslihan Öztürk, Oğuz Kaan Köksal, Büşra Körpe, Candost Hanedan, Çağanay Soysal, Vakkas Korkmaz
{"title":"339例子宫内膜癌患者淋巴结转移与免疫组织化学分子亚型的关系","authors":"Hande Nur Öncü, Gökçen Ege, Neslihan Öztürk, Oğuz Kaan Köksal, Büşra Körpe, Candost Hanedan, Çağanay Soysal, Vakkas Korkmaz","doi":"10.1111/jog.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the association between immunohistochemically (IHC) molecular subtypes and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in endometrial cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 339 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) confined to the uterus and treated with pelvic ± para-aortic lymph node dissection (LND), who were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: LNM-negative (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 289) and LNM-positive (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 50). All patients underwent IHC-based molecular subtype analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median age was 62 years (34–79) in Group 1 and 64 years (48–79) in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.022). Body mass index (BMI) and parity were similar between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). LNM was detected in 14.7% of patients (50/339). Among Group 1, 64.4% (186/289) had a non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 20.1% (58/289) had mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), and 15.5% (45/289) had the p53 abnormal (p53abn) subtype. In contrast, in Group 2, 44% (22/50) were NSMP, 24% (12/50) were MMRd, and 32% (16/50) were p53abn (<i>p</i> = 0.008). A statistically significant association was observed between LNM and the p53abn subtype. LNM was present in 26% (16/61) of patients with the p53abn subtype, compared to 17% (12/70) in the MMRd group and 11% (22/208) in the NSMP group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While our study identified an association between the p53abn subtype and lymph node metastasis, this finding alone does not support using p53 status in isolation to determine lymphatic staging; instead, it should be considered a complementary marker alongside established clinicopathologic factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"51 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between lymph node metastasis and immunohistochemical molecular subtypes in endometrial cancer: A cohort study of 339 patients\",\"authors\":\"Hande Nur Öncü, Gökçen Ege, Neslihan Öztürk, Oğuz Kaan Köksal, Büşra Körpe, Candost Hanedan, Çağanay Soysal, Vakkas Korkmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the association between immunohistochemically (IHC) molecular subtypes and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in endometrial cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study included 339 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) confined to the uterus and treated with pelvic ± para-aortic lymph node dissection (LND), who were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: LNM-negative (Group 1, <i>n</i> = 289) and LNM-positive (Group 2, <i>n</i> = 50). All patients underwent IHC-based molecular subtype analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The median age was 62 years (34–79) in Group 1 and 64 years (48–79) in Group 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.022). Body mass index (BMI) and parity were similar between the groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). LNM was detected in 14.7% of patients (50/339). Among Group 1, 64.4% (186/289) had a non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 20.1% (58/289) had mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), and 15.5% (45/289) had the p53 abnormal (p53abn) subtype. In contrast, in Group 2, 44% (22/50) were NSMP, 24% (12/50) were MMRd, and 32% (16/50) were p53abn (<i>p</i> = 0.008). A statistically significant association was observed between LNM and the p53abn subtype. LNM was present in 26% (16/61) of patients with the p53abn subtype, compared to 17% (12/70) in the MMRd group and 11% (22/208) in the NSMP group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While our study identified an association between the p53abn subtype and lymph node metastasis, this finding alone does not support using p53 status in isolation to determine lymphatic staging; instead, it should be considered a complementary marker alongside established clinicopathologic factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"51 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70065\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between lymph node metastasis and immunohistochemical molecular subtypes in endometrial cancer: A cohort study of 339 patients
Aim
This study evaluated the association between immunohistochemically (IHC) molecular subtypes and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in endometrial cancer.
Methods
The study included 339 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) confined to the uterus and treated with pelvic ± para-aortic lymph node dissection (LND), who were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: LNM-negative (Group 1, n = 289) and LNM-positive (Group 2, n = 50). All patients underwent IHC-based molecular subtype analysis. Demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics were evaluated.
Results
The median age was 62 years (34–79) in Group 1 and 64 years (48–79) in Group 2 (p = 0.022). Body mass index (BMI) and parity were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). LNM was detected in 14.7% of patients (50/339). Among Group 1, 64.4% (186/289) had a non-specific molecular profile (NSMP), 20.1% (58/289) had mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), and 15.5% (45/289) had the p53 abnormal (p53abn) subtype. In contrast, in Group 2, 44% (22/50) were NSMP, 24% (12/50) were MMRd, and 32% (16/50) were p53abn (p = 0.008). A statistically significant association was observed between LNM and the p53abn subtype. LNM was present in 26% (16/61) of patients with the p53abn subtype, compared to 17% (12/70) in the MMRd group and 11% (22/208) in the NSMP group.
Conclusion
While our study identified an association between the p53abn subtype and lymph node metastasis, this finding alone does not support using p53 status in isolation to determine lymphatic staging; instead, it should be considered a complementary marker alongside established clinicopathologic factors.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.